Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Tata Technologies Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-I And Vica-Versa

Cenvat Credit - demand of 8% on value of Exempted services - Rule 6(3)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - appellants had not filed a declaration under Rule 6(3A) - It is urged that unreasonable result cannot be intended by the legislature - The appellants have already reversed the CEnvat credit of ₹ 5,06,736/- attributable to input services used in providing exempted services during the financial year 2008-09 along with the interest of ₹ 21,658/-. - Reversal was not on monthly bas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

calculated the CENVAT Credit in terms of clause (c) read with clause (h) and have deposited the amount so determined, by 30 th June in the succeeding financial year as prescribed. - There is no dispute with regard to the CENVAT Credit reworked by the assessee which is attributable to the exempted output services. Further, there is merit in the contention of the assessee that Rule 6 cannot be used as tool of oppression to extract the amount which is much beyond the remedial measure and what .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t be negated by the Cenvat Credit Rules, which is a delegated legislation and subservient to the main Act. - Demand set aside - Decided in favor of assessee. - Appeal No. ST/419/10 & ST/92/11, ST/CO/20/11 - Final Order Nos. A/85171-85173/2016-WZB/STB - Dated:- 4-1-2016 - Anil Choudhary, Member (J) And P S Pruthi, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri L Badrinarayan, Adv For the Respondent : Shri K S Mishra, Addl. Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per P S Pruthi The brief facts are that the appellant as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pted services and avail input service credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules on common input services used in providing output services. During the relevant period i.e. April -September 2008, the value of the exempted services provided by the appellants is ₹ 20,31,62,113/-. The maintaining a separate account for input services used for taxable services and for exempted services. The appellants exercised the option provided in Rule 6(3)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nclosed in appeal file. Though the appellants did not reverse the proportionate credit on monthly basis, but, such credit was not utilized during the said period. 2.1 A show cause notice dated 22.10.2009 was issued to the appellants which proposed to recover an amount equal to 8% of the value of exempted services amounting to ₹ 20,31,62,113/-, i.e. ₹ 1,62,52,969/- under Rule 6(3)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, since the appellants had not filed a declaration under Rule 6(3A) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

impose penalty under section 78 of the Act. 2.2 On adjudication of the show-cause notice, the Ld. Commissioner, vide Order-in-Original No. PI/COMMR/ST/01/2010 dated 28.05.2010 confirmed the demand of ₹ 1,62,52,969/- and appropriated the amount of ₹ 5,06,736/- already paid by the appellants towards the same. The Commissioner also ordered for recovery of interest under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and appropriated the amount of ₹ 21,658/- already paid by the appellan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f input or input service which is used in providing exempted services, except in the circumstances mentioned in sub-rule (2). Sub-rule (2) of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provides that where a provider of output service avails of CENVAT credit in respect of any inputs or input services and provides such output service which are chargeable to tax as well as exempted services, then, the provider of output service shall maintain separate accounts for receipt, consumption and inventory of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to pay an amount equal to 8% of the value of exempted services. Rule 6(3)(ii) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as amended from 1.4.2008, gives an option to the service provider to proportionately reverse the credit obtained on inputs and input services used for providing exempted services. Rule 6(3A) lays down the procedure which is to followed while exercising the option under Rule 6(3)(ii). Rule 6 (3A)(a) provides that the following information has to be intimated in writing to the Superinte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on. Further, Rule 6(3A)(b) provides that the service provider has to make the payments every month of the amount calculated according to the formula prescribed. 3.2 The Commissioner relied on the decision in the case of M/s Golden Dew Tea Factory v. CCE, Coimbatore, 2007 (219) ELT 362 (Tri - Chennai) as affirmed by the Supreme Court 2008 (221) ELT A 28(SC) to stated that the conditions which give relief from taxation cannot be held to be procedural and are mandatory in nature. Ld counsel submits .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uments. It is not the case that the department is required to decide the eligibility of the appellants to avail the option under Rule 6(3)(ii), on the basis of the information provided in the declaration. Therefore the ratio of the Golden Dew Tea Factory case (supra) is inapplicable in the facts of the present case. Further a provision cannot be interpreted in such a manner that it frustrates the very objective for which it was enacted. 3.3 It is further contended that similar provisions were ea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct is exempt from the whole of duty of excise leviable thereon or is chargeable to Nil rate of duty." Thereafter, in view of the practical difficulties being faced by the manufacturer(s) engaged in manufacture of both the dutiable and final product, changes were made in the Budget for 1996-97, Rule 57CC was introduced which provided that in the existent system whenever the manufacturer clears the exempted final product, he is required to reverse the credit taken on inputs contained in the e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on which modvat credit has been taken is used or contained in the exempted final product. This was done to eliminate the problem of determination of input duty credit used or contained in the exempted final product. In the present case, the amount of input credit attributable to the exempted output service during the period is ₹ 5,06,736/- which has admittedly been reversed by making payment to the Revenue on 7.5.2009 along with filing of the appropriate declaration whereas the revenue hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te if there is some other construction available. Reliance is also placed on the ruling of the Apex Court in the case of Tirath Singh Vs Bachittar Singh - 1955 (2) SCR 457, wherein it is held as under:- "But it is a rule of interpretation well-established that, "Where the language of a statute, in its ordinary meaning and grammatical construction, leads to a manifest contradiction of the apparent purpose of the enactment, or to some inconvenience or absurdity, hardship or injustice, pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t if Rule 6 is read in such a manner that the option under Rule 6(3)(ii) shall be unavailable, unless the procedural formalities under Rule 6(3A) are complied with before exercising the option, then it would lead to an unreasonable result where an assessee would have to pay 8 of the value of exempted services even though the actual credit taken is much less. The main objective of Rule 6 is to ensure that an assessee cannot take credit of tax paid on input services used for exempted services. 3.5 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es grant benefit of credit and it is perfectly legal to quote condition that credit of Service Tax paid on input services used or providing exempted service will not be available, but in the guise of putting such conditions, it is not open to the Revenue to state that even when the assessee is willing to forgo credit of Service Tax paid on input services used for providing exempted service, the same is not acceptable to the Revenue and the assessee should pay the amount equal to 8% of the value .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arned Counsel also relies on the ruling of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of UOI Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd. - 2006 (204) ELT 230 (Raj), wherein the assessee have availed Modvat credit of duty paid on capital goods received in factory as per Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. However, declaration required to be filed under Section 57-T(1) was filed after 3 months of the receipt of the capital goods in factory and availing credit of duty. The goods were received on 31.3.2000. However, d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d in and used in the manufacturing of end products in the factory. If these conditions are fulfilled then the procedural lapse on part of the assessee in making of declaration or furnishing incomplete particulars should not come in the way of assessee availing Modvat benefit. 3.9 The learned Counsel also relied on the ruling of the Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Lakshmi Machine Works (2007) 290 ITR 668 (SC), wherein the deduction was provided under Section 88D of the IT Act on the total turn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etation to that expression. There is one more reason for giving schematic interpretation. The various amendments to Section 80 HHC show that receipts by way of brokerage, commission, interest, rent, etc do not form part of business profits as they have no nexus with the activity of exports. If interest or rent was not regarded by the legislature as business profits, the question of treating the same as part of the total turnover in the above formula does not arise. 3.10 The learned Counsel furth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t Credit Rules, the learned Commissioner has erred in allowing the benefit under Rule 6(3)(ii). Further reliance is placed on the furling of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of C. Ex vs. Harichand Shri Gopal - 2010 (260) ELT 3 (SC), wherein the facts were that the assessee was engaged in manufacture of excisable goods namely, preparation containing Chewing Tobacco falling under Heading 2404.40 chargeable to nil rate of duty, which was made leviable of Central Excise duty w.e.f. 1.3.199 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee under the cover of 'transfer challan' describing therein the said goods as "addictive Mixtures" or "KIMAM/K". The factories of the assessee were inspected and samples drawn of the findinshed products and also statements were recorded. Other units of the assessee were also inspected and it was noticed that the Addictive Mixtures (Kimam) was manufactured at the factory at Delhi was being clandestinely removed for the manufacture of chewing tobacco. It was also not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from the factory clandestinely without payment of duty in contravention of the provisions of the Act and the Rules. In such facts, it was held by the Apex Court that the law is well settled that a person who claims exemption or concession has to establish that he is entitled to exemption. A provision providing for an exemption, concession or exception, as the case may be, has to be construed strictly with certain exceptions depending upon the settings on which the provision has been placed in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urged that the assessee had not reversed the proportionate credit on monthly basis, but such credit was admittedly not utilized during the said period. It is further urged that the learned Commissioner has erred in not considering the fact that the condition cannot be held to be procedural and these are mandatory in nature. 4.3 Further, reliance is placed on the ruling of this Tribunal in the case of Golden Dew Tea Factory Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise - 2009 (15) STR 358, wherein the issu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion from duty will commence from the date of the undertaking when the AC/DC of Central Excise, as specified in condition (b), which provided that :- The manufacturer files an undertaking, that:- (i) the green leaf used by the factory during the period on and from 10 th December, 1999 to 31 st March, 2000 shall not be purchased from any grower who has a holding exceeding ten hectares under tea cultivation. (ii) The co-operative society owning the factory is registered with the Registrar of Coope .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

duty of excise specified in the First Schedule to the said Central Excise Tariff Act. Admittedly the undertaking was filed after much delay, it was held by this Tribunal that although the assessee who have been held liable to pay duty on the Tea cleared by them during the initial part of the financial year 2000-01, had availed themselves of the benefit of Notification No. 41/99-C.E. in respect of the clearances made prior to 1-4-2000 after satisfying the conditions for such benefit. For 2000-01 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f both sides. To appreciate the facts, it is useful to reproduce the relevant Rule Rule 6. Obligation of manufacturer of dutiable and exempted goods and provider of taxable and exempted services.- (1) The CENVAT credit shall not be allowed on such quantity of input or input service which is used in the manufacture of exempted goods or for provision of exempted services, except in the circumstances mentioned in sub-rule (2). Provided that the CENVAT credit on inputs shall not be denied to job wor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der of output service shall maintain separate accounts for receipt, consumption and inventory of input and input service meant for use in the manufacture of dutiable final products or in providing output service and the quantity of input meant for use in the manufacture of exempted goods or services and take CENVAT credit only on that quantity of input or input service which is intended for use in the manufacture of dutiable goods or in providing output service on which service tax is payable. ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

provider of output service shall pay an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit attributable to inputs and input services used in, or in relation to, the manufacture of exempted goods or for provision of exempted services subject to the conditions and procedure specified in sub-rule (3A). Explanation I.- If the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service, avails any of the option under this sub-rule, he shall exercise such option for all exempted goods manufactured by him or, as the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er of output service shall, determine and pay, provisionally for every month, the amount equivalent to CENVAT Credit attributable to inputs used for provisions of exempted service. Further clause (c) provides, the manufacturer of goods or the provider of service, shall determine finally the amount of CENVAT Credit attributable to the exempted goods or services for the whole financial year, and further clause (d) provides that the manufacturer of the goods or the provider of output service, shall .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat where the amount equivalent to CENVAT Credit attributable to exempted goods or exempted services cannot be determined provisionally, as prescribed in condition (b), due to reasons that no dutiable goods/taxable services were provided in the preceding financial year, then such manufacturer or provider of service is not required to determine and pay such amount provisionally for each month, but shall determine the CENVAT Credit attributable to exempted goods or exempted services for the whole .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the requirements under Rule 6(3A) like, name, address and registration no. of the assessee, description of taxable services and exempted services, CENVAT Credit of inputs and input services lying in balance as on the date of exercising option, are already available in the records of the Revenue. We further find it is an admitted fact that the assessee herein have calculated the CENVAT Credit in terms of clause (c) read with clause (h) and have deposited the amount so determined, by 30 th June in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Notification: CGST Rate Schedule u/s 9(1) - notifying rates of CGST @ 2.5%, 6%, 9%, 14%, 1.5% and 0.125% on Supply of Goods

Forum: REGISTRETION

Forum: On what Value tax to be deducted at source (TDS)

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version