Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dhanlaxmi Developers Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

2016 (1) TMI 1026 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Levy of fee u/s 234E in the order u/s 200A - Held that:- The adjustment in respect of levy of fees under section 234E was indeed beyond the scope of permissible adjustments contemplated under section 200A.

In view of these discussions, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, the impugned levy of fees under section 234 E is unsustainable in law. We, therefore, uphold the grievance of the assessee and delete the impugned levy of fee under section 234E of the Act. - Decided in fav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeals; therefore, these were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. For the facility of reference, I take the lead case as ITA No. 2888/Ahd/2015 for AY 2014-15. 2. In this appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:- The order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-8, Ahmedabad in confirming levy of fees u/s 234E is bad in law on the following grounds:- 1. There is no inherent power with AO (DCIT-CPC Cell- TDS) u/s 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4. Late fees demand cannot be raised by processing TDS return because section 200A do not provide default for payment of late fees u/s 234E. 5. The assessee craves for liberty to amend, modify and add any grounds of appeal and file additional evidences. 3. At the time of hearing before me, the ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee pointed out that similar issue arose before the Tribunal in the case of Tanish Industries Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT in ITA No.2296/Ahd/2015 for AY 2014-15, wherein the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al contentions and gone through the record carefully. The ITAT, Amristar Bench has made elaborate discussion on this issue. The finding has been reproduced in the case of Indian Overseas Bank Vs. DCIT, Ghaziabad rendered in ITA No.3271/Ahd/2014. It reads as under: 5. I find that the issue in appeal is now squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of ITAT Amritsar Bench in the case of Sibia Healthcare Private Limited vs. DCIT - ITA No.90/Asr/2015, vide order dated 9th June, 2015, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le Karanataka High Court in the case of Adithya Bizor P Solutions Vs Union of India [WP No. 6918-6938/2014(T-IT), Hon ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Om Prakash Dhoot Vs Union of India [WP No. 1981 of 2014] and of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia Vs Union of India [WP No. 771 of 2014], granting stay on the demands raised in respect of fees under section 234E. The full text of these decisions were not produced before us. However, as admittedly there are no orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s as follows: 234E. Fee for defaults in furnishing statements (1) Without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, where a person fails to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 206C, he shall be liable to pay, by way of fee, a sum of two hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues. (2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d at source or tax collected at source, as the case may be, on or after the 1st day of July, 2012. 6. We may also reproduce the Section 200A which was inserted by the Finance Act 2009 with effect from 1st April 2010. This statutory provision, as it stood at the relevant point of time, was as follows: 200A: Processing of statements of tax deducted at source (1) Where a statement of tax deduction at source, or a correction statement, has been made by a person deducting any sum (hereafter referred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

refund due to, the deductor shall be determined after adjustment of amount computed under clause (b) against any amount paid under section 200 and section 201, and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest; (d) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (c); and (e) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (c) shall .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

espect of rate of deduction of tax at source, where such rate is not in accordance with the provisions of this Act; (2) For the purposes of processing of statements under sub-section (1), the Board may make a scheme for centralised processing of statements of tax deducted at source to expeditiously determine the tax payable by, or the refund due to, the deductor as required under the said subsection. 7. By way of Finance Act 2015, and with effect from 1st June 2015, there is an amendment in Sect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ause (c) against any amount paid under section 200 or section 201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (d); and (f) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (d) shall be granted to the deductor. 8. In effect thus, post 1st June 2015, in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n for raising a demand in respect of levy of fees under section 234E. While examining the correctness of the intimation under section 200A, we have to be guided by the limited mandate of Section 200A, which, at the relevant point of time, permitted computation of amount recoverable from, or payable to, the tax deductor after making the following adjustments: (a). after making adjustment on account of arithmetical errors and incorrect claims apparent from any information in the statement - Sectio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stments contemplated under section 200A. This intimation is an appealable order under section 246A(a), and, therefore, the CIT(A) ought to have examined legality of the adjustment made under this intimation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of the provisions of Section 234E. That is not the issue here. The issue is whether such a levy could be effected in the course of intimation under section 200A. The a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s filed on 19th February 2014, such a levy could only have been made at best within 31st March 2015. That time has already elapsed and the defect is thus not curable even at this stage. In view of these discussions, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, the impugned levy of fees under section 234 E is unsustainable in law. We, therefore, uphold the grievance of the assessee and delete the impugned levy of fee under section 234E of the Act. The assessee gets the relief accordingly. 6. Whe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version