Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Volvo India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax (LTU)

Revision u/s 263 - claim of allowance under the provisions of sec. 40(a)(ia) was not examined by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings - Held that:- The assessee could not demonstrate before us that the issue was examined by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. It is settled principle of law that non-enquiry by the AO on an issue confers jurisdiction on the CIT to revise the assessment. The Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court, in the case of CIT vs. Infosys Technologies .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Infosys Technologies Ltd.(supra), we hold that the ld.CIT(LTU) was justified in assuming jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act and directing for de novo assessment. - Decided against assessee - ITA No. 687/Bang/2015 - Dated:- 20-1-2016 - Asha Vijaraghavan, JM And Inturi Rama Rao, AM For the Appellant : Shri P Dinesh, Advo For the Respondent : Shri Binod Kumar Singh, CIT (DR) ORDER Per Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal by the assessee-company is directed agai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ainable. 2. On the facts there being no error much less an error prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax ought to have refrained from invoking the provisions of sec.263 of the Act. 3. Without prejudice, the learned Commissioner erroneously disallowed the expenditure of ₹ 2,36,07,661/- as deduction without considering the fact that the AO had considered the explanation of the appellant and had passed a speaking order U/s 143(3) r.w.sec 144C of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7-08 6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner failed to consider the case of Pfizer wherein the Tribunal has settled the principles that the disallowance of expenses is not required u/sec. 40(a)(ia) if the identity of the parties are not known, which is very much similar with the present case. 7. For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing of the appeal the appellant prays that the appeal may be allowed. 3. Brief facts of the case ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 347,04,06,832/- after making several disallowances. Being aggrieved by the disallowance, an appeal was filed and pending disposal. As the matter stood thus, the ld.CIT (LTU) had issued notice u/s 263 dated 4/2/2015 calling upon the assessee-company to show cause as to why the assessment order cannot be revised, as the AO had failed to disallow a sum of ₹ 2,36,07,661/- as no tax deduction was made. In response to show cause notice, assessee-company submitted vide letter dated 11/3/2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g the explanation of the assessee-company observed that TDS on an amount of ₹ 2,36,07,661/- was not made in any of the years but it is claimed as deduction in the year under consideration and therefore, held that the amount cannot be claimed as a deduction under the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld.CIT(LTU) held that this claim of the assessee was not examined by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Therefore, he set aside the assessment order to examine this i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

5 SOT 277. 4.2 On the other hand, learned CIT(DR) supported the order of the ld.CIT(LTU) passed u/s 263 of the Act. 4.3 We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue that arises for our consideration in the present appeal is whether the ld.CIT(LTU) was justified in assuming jurisdiction under the provisions of sec.263 of the Act. The only ground on which the ld.CIT(LTU)exercised the power of revision u/s 263 was that the claim of allowance of ₹ 2,36,07, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

wing the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Co. vs. CIT (243 ITR 83), held that where deduction was allowed by the AO without indicating the basis, that could be considered as an order both erroneous and prejudicial to interests of revenue vide paras.27 & 28 which read as under: 27. The assessing authority performs a quasi-judicial function and the reasons for his conclusions and findings should be forthcoming in the assessment order. Though it is urged o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version