Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Jaipur Development Authority Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- (5) , Jaipur and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- (5) , Jaipur Versus Jaipur Development Authority

2016 (1) TMI 1082 - ITAT JAIPUR

Registration granted U/s 12AA withdrawn - assessee is not entitled exemption U/s 11,12 and 13 - change of accounting policy - Held that:- The assessee has been granted registration by the order of the Coordinate Bench wherein the coordinate Bench has held that the assessee’s activities are charitable and are not covered U/s 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is directed to give benefit of Section 11 and 12 of the Act to the assessee. The income of the assessee is to be assessed o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e. A change in the method of accounting should not be rejected for reasons that it would result in bringing into accounts in one year the losses of several years as held in the case of CIT Vs. Eastern Bengal Jute Trading Co. Ltd. (1978 (1) TMI 72 - CALCUTTA High Court ) Accordingly change of the accounting policy is allowed.

The assessee has claimed depreciation on fixed assets which is also allowable as held by the various courts in case of Trust where the assessee first made income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

II, Jaipur for A.Y. 2009-10. The effective grounds of both the appeal are as under:- Grounds of assessee s appeal:- 1. The ld. CIT(A)-II has erred at law as well as in facts to apply the provisions of Section 145(3) and assessee in the manner as provided in section 1 44 of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. The ld CIT(A)-II has erred in law and exceeded in jurisdiction in disallowing the exemptions U/s 11 of the Act by holding that the activities of the appellant Board are not charitable in view of amended .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A)-II has erred at law as well as in facts in disallowing ₹ 1,07,02,423/- on account of expenses on shooting range. 5. The ld CIT(A)-II has erred at law as well as in facts in disallowing ₹ 5,00,00,000/- being expenditure as contribution for Deendayal Medical Hospital at Jaipur assuming them as donation to charitable institutions, further doubly disallowing the same. 6. The ld CIT(A)-II has erred at law as well as in facts in disallowing ₹ 1,74,22,857/- on account of amorti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the assessee has already take deduction of cost of assets purchased in earlier years as application of income in earlier year and claiming of depreciation on such assets would tantamount to double benefit. 2. The ld Assessing Officer has observed that the assessee is maintaining and developing of area and civic amenities including allotment of lands. The assessee filed its return on 29/09/2009 claiming loss of ₹ 1,86,64,18,300/-. The case was scrutinized U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from A.Y. 2009-10, there was no registration U/s 12AA of the Act and the assessee is not entitled exemption U/s 11,12 and 13 of the Act. Therefore, the ld Assessing Officer calculated the assessee s income as per the normal provisions of the Act. The auditor of the assessee company had made 15 qualification on method of accounting adopted by the assessee one of the qualification is as under:- The authority has maintained the accounts on cash basis and has carried various notes in schedule X to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the income and expenditure and balance sheet of the qualification mentioned herein after could not be reported since not ascertained by the management as reported in the respective notes. The ld Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had not followed existed accounting principle. He has not satisfied about correctness or completeness of the account of the assessee and in view of Section 145(3), the assessment was made in manner provided U/s 144 of the Act as a best assessment. The ld Asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

applied the last year method of accounting, the deposit shown in the income and expenditure account was required to be reduced by ₹ 2,69,69,91,775/- to make it comparable with the last year method. It does not include 5% of administrative expenditure, which was the practice till last year, which was worked out at ₹ 1,41,85.013/-. He further found that ₹ 27,08,29,603/- had incurred on development work on shooting range. The expenses are required to be considered as application o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lowed. The assessee also made payment exceeding ₹ 20,000/- cash amounting to ₹ 1,26,000/- which has also been disallowed U/s 40(a)(3) of the Act. The assessee had claimed depreciation amounting to ₹ 1,98,41,604/-. Since the expenditure in respect of addition to fixed assets is already allowed in earlier years as application of income, assessee is not entitled for double deduction on those additions to fixed assets in the shape of deprecation. Accordingly, depreciation was not a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h to Amber Development Authority and Deen Dayal Charitable Trust. No doubt these expenses would be admissible as application of income but in regular computation of income, these expenditures are not allowable. The ld Assessing Officer finally assessed the total income of the assessee at ₹ 126,36,80,980/- in place of deficit at ₹ 186,64,18,300/-. 3. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter before the ld CIT(A), who had confirmed the order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

view of the amendment made in Section 2(15) wherein charitable purpose by way of advancement of any other object of general public utility had been added in this Section, advancement of any other object of general public utility shall not be charitable purpose in certain circumstances that is if it involves the carrying on any activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business, or any activity or rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee on any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the JDA is selling property on auction, which is an activity duly commercial in nature. The assessee argued that the assessee is a charitable organization as per JDA Act. The assessee had followed existed principle of accounting, any change made in accounting system has been qualified by the auditor by providing the note in assessment year 2008-09, the develo0pment receipts and entire development expenditure was put and then the result was taken to the balance sheet. During the year under co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies in the Jaipur region is carried out by the assessee itself or through local authority or private operators but on control from initial production given to completion of project always under the watch of the assessee. The norms of the JDA has to be followed by them. They further argued that the Hon ble ITAT has granted registration U/s 12AA, therefore, even due to change of accounting policy as such there is no surplus if calculated will be adjusted against either carry forwarded loss of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld CIT(A) has computed the income after considering the deficit shown by the assessee from page 46 to 63 and held that disallowance of ₹ 141,85,013/- taken out in the second part of ground No. 2, in this appeal, has been enhanced to ₹ 21,13,94,421/- as this is the correct amount, which should have been reduced from the expenditure side of the income and expenditure statement as per accounting note 9 of A.Y. 2008-09. According to which, 5% of development expenditure excluding grant g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de before the ld CIT(A) and argued that the Hon ble ITAT has granted registration U/s 12AA of the Act w.e.f. 14/3/2007. The Assessing Officer has to allow the benefit given in Section 11 and 12 of the Act to the assessee Trust. There is no doubt that the assessee s activities are charitable and are not covered U/s 2(15) of the Act. The Hon ble Bench has considered this issue also at the time of allowing the registration in favour of the assessee. He further argued that in case of Trust, there is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee is not getting any benefit from the development activity as it is not an income generated apparatus for the assessee. Therefore, whole amount on development has been debited in the P&L account. Whatever development activity carried out by the appellant is making available to the public such as road, sewerage, developing of societies, water facilities, gardens and no revenue has been charged from the public on using these facilities. Therefore, there is no benefit to the assessee but being .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arat High Court at Ahmedabad (Tax Appeal No. 902 of 2013) in the case of CIT Vs Mapin Publishing Pvt. Ltd. 5. At the outset, the ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the ld CIT(A) and argued that the assessee s registration has been withdrawn by the CIT. However, the Hon ble ITAT has allowed registration U/s 12AA of the Act, therefore, she fairly accepted the arguments made by the ld counsel for the assessee. Accordingly benefit of Section 11 and 12 are to be given by the Assessing Office .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version