Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Great Offshore Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Kandla

2016 (2) TMI 9 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Department issued show cause notice (the present proceedings) proposing to confiscate the tug under Section 111(f) and impose penalty, for not filing IGM for the intervening period 16.07.2001 to 29.11.2002. - Held that:- the Department was aware of the irregularities committed by the Appellant at the time of first proceedings, wherein the Appellants were allowed to file Bill of Entry. It also appears that penalty was imposed at that time. Therefore, not amending the IGM amounts to only a technic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the Appellant: Shri T. Vishwanathan, Shri Manish Jain, Ms.Uma Lohray, Advocates For the Respondent: Shri L. Tendupatra, Authorised Representative JUDGEMENT Per: P.M. Saleem The facts of the case in the present appeal are as follows:- Date Events 04.12.2000 Tug arrived at Mumbai port and entry inward was granted by Customs on the same day. The tug was brought to India for temporary purposes, under a bare-boat charter. This was on the basis of permission obtained from DG, Shipping, on 31.10.201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Nil, for goods falling under Heading 89.04. 16.07.2001 The Appellants purchased the said tug from original importer i.e. M/s Great Eastern (Fujairah) LLC-FZC, after obtaining permission from DG Shipping. 14.11.2002 Appellants requested the Department to allow them to file Bill of Entry in respect of the tug, as according to them, it is a permanent acquisition of the tug. 21.11.2002 Ld.Assistant Commissioner of Customs, permitted the Appellants to file Bill of Entry for tug, on payment of penalt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tment issued show cause notice (the present proceedings) proposing to confiscate the tug under Section 111(f) and impose penalty, for not filing IGM for the intervening period 16.07.2001 to 29.11.2002. 2. The ld.Commissioner of Customs vide the impugned order dt.11.03.2008 confiscated the vessel with redemption fine of ₹ 25 lakhs and imposed penalty of ₹ 25 lakhs on the Appellant. Aggrieved by the same, the Appellants are before us. 3. Heard both sides. The Appellant made the followi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ther under the FTDR Act or the Policy made thereunder. Therefore, the provisions of Section 111(f) are not attracted in the instant case. e) Board s Circular No. 16/2012-Customs, dated 13.06.2012 provides that prior to 17.03.2012 there was no requirement of filing of IGM and Bill of Entry in respect of vessels brought from abroad and converted for coastal trade. It has been clarified as follows:- As regards the vessel for conversion into coastal run/trade as detailed in Para 3.4, since the chang .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filed on 29.11.2002 with post facto permission of ld.Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Mundra. This IGM would relate back to the date of import. Reliance is placed on decision in case of Assistant Collector v. Associated Forest Products Pvt. Ltd. - 2000 (115) E.L.T. 37 (S.C.). g) In Final Order dated 13.2.2006 the Tribunal held that bill of entry filed for IGM is good enough to cover the vessel imported. In that case, the Department confiscated the vessel and demanded duty on the ground that b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly refuted the submissions of the Appellant and reiterated the findings of the Adjudicating authority. 5. After considering the arguments of both the sides and on perusal of the records, it is observed that the Department was aware that the vessel had been initially brought into Indian waters by its foreign owners as a foreign going vessel and was converted to coastal run vessel, on temporary basis, under a leave boat charter agreement. At that time, IGM and Bill of Entry were filed and the ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version