Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Radan Multimedia Limited Versus Asstt. Commissionr of Income tax, Raigad.

Disallowance of depreciation - whether the same amount has been disallowed under block assessment proceedings and was assessed as undisclosed income thus the disallowance of depreciation is wrong? - Held that:- The settled legal proposition is that the block assessment and regular assessment are two different assessment proceedings and they will run parallelly. The items that are required to be considered in the block assessment cannot be considered in the regular assessment proceedings and vice .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he file of the AO with the direction to examine this claim of the assessee and take appropriate decision in accordance with the law in the light of discussions made supra.

Disallowance of Machinery purchase - Held that:- We notice that the assessee has claimed that it has declared the sales of films picturised by using the films of ₹ 1.04 crores referred above. There should not be any doubt that the pictures could not be produced without the use of films and if the sale of pictu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

w 20% of the film cost of ₹ 1.04 crores, since the assessing officer has assessed the sale of pictures. We order accordingly.

Disallowance of Expenditure related to bogus sales - Held that:- We agree with the contentions of the assessee that the same is beyond the scope of the set aside proceedings. As noticed earlier, though the assessing officer has taken the view that the sale of pictures also is bogus one, he has not eliminated the same from the total income of the assessee. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee for business purposes, we are of the view that the finance charges are allowable as deduciton, as the hire purchase finance is only one of the modes of raising loans. Hence, in our view, this issue requires fresh examination. Accordingly, we set aside the order of Ld CIT(A) on this issue and direct the AO to examine the manner of utilization of loan availed from the finance companies

Disallowance of depreciation - Held that:- In the earlier paragraphs, the assessee has claim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ther it is also the responsibility of the assessee to show that the machineries worth 0.32 crores was actually purchased. Accordingly, this issue is also set aside to the file of the AO with the direction to examine the same afresh. - I.T.A. No.500/Mum/2005 - Dated:- 6-1-2016 - SHRI B.R.BASKARAN (AM) AND RAMLAL NEGI, (JM) For The Appellant : Shri Salil Kapoor For The Rspondent : Shri Vinod Kumar ORDER PER B.R. BASKARAN (AM) The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 29-10-2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de proceedings. (b) Scope of assessment of items assessed in the block assessment order. 4. The facts relating to the case are stated in brief. The original assessment in this case was completed on 31.3.1999 determining a total income of ₹ 1,72,05,380/- on the basis of findings recorded during the course of survey operations conducted u/s 133A of the Act on 23.03.1999. The assessee filed appeal before Ld CIT(A) challenging the original assessment order. In the mean time, the revenue also c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the claim of 100% depreciation was not correct and further the assessee claimed that it has purchased raw materials in the form of films to the tune of ₹ 1.04 crores and the same was wrongly claimed as energy savings devices. Since a new claim was made, the ld CIT(A) set aside the matter with the following observations:- …..At the time of appeal hearings the appellant has stated that its claim for 100% depreciation was not correct but it was purchased of raw materials in the form .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ich have been doubted by the A.O have to be looked into vis-à-vis the materials found during the course of search, whether the assets on which depreciation has been claimed were found in the physical verification of the assets during the search have to be verified and reconcile. All this needs thorough scrutiny and investigation. Therefore, in the interest of justice, I set aside the assessment to be redone after giving reasonable opportunity to the appellant to prove its fresh claims mad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case Saheli Synthetics P Ltd Vs. CIT reported in 302 ITR 126. 6. We agree with the said contentions of the assessee. It is a well settled proposition of law that the assessing officer is not entitled to travel beyond the scope of set aside. The Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case cited above has clearly held the set aside envisaged by the order of CIT(A) was in the context of the additions or disallowances which were in appeal before the appellate authority. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

wing the same again in the set aside proceedings. 8. We have earlier noticed that the assessee had initially claimed 100% depreciation on energy savings devices, which was disallowed in the original assessment proceedings. Later, the assessee changed its stand and submitted that the claim of ₹ 1.36 crores depreciation on energy savings device was wrong, but the said expenditure includes purchase of films worth ₹ 1.04 crores. In the set aside proceedings, the AO disallowed the claim o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ount of ₹ 1.04 crores would amount to double disallowance. 10. The settled legal proposition is that the block assessment and regular assessment are two different assessment proceedings and they will run parallelly. The items that are required to be considered in the block assessment cannot be considered in the regular assessment proceedings and vice versa. Hence the items which have been assessed as undisclosed income in block assessment proceedings cannot be considered/assessed in regula .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ht of discussions made supra. 11. The next legal issue contested by the assessee relates to the scope of set aside proceedings. In the preceding paragraphs, we have discussed about the same. Before us, the Ld A.R submitted that the following additions made by the assessing officer in the set aside proceedings are new additions, which will not be covered by the scope of set aside:- (a) Machinery purchase Rs.1,04,15,121/- (b) Expenditure related to bogus sales ₹ 32,52,353/- However, we notic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng the films of ₹ 1.04 crores referred above. There should not be any doubt that the pictures could not be produced without the use of films and if the sale of pictures is assessed, then the corresponding expenditure should be allowed. Even though the assessing officer has considered the sales also as bogus, he did not exclude the value of sales from the income of the assessee. Since the purchase of films have not been proved by the assessee, we are of the view that this issue should be se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng officer has taken the view that the sale of pictures also is bogus one, he has not eliminated the same from the total income of the assessee. Accordingly, we are of the view that there is no reason to disallow the expenses arrived on a proportionate basis. Accordingly we direct the AO to delete this disallowance. 14. With regard to the disallowance of finance charges, the Ld A.R submitted that the said addition was also made in the original assessment proceedings. The assessee claimed to have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version