Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 129 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2016 (2) TMI 129 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - TMI - Profit estimation - ITAT reducing the profit estimated from 16% to 8% - Held that:- The entire examination was on the basis of evidence on record and would not call for any question of law. It is true that the provisions of section 44AD of the Act would not ipso facto apply to every acts of the Tribunal merely adopting a yardstick in absence of any other concrete evidence to enable itself to estimate the true profit of the assessee.

With r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

imilar background. In Tax Appeal No.911 of 2015 for assessment year 2008-09, the revenue has suggested following question for our consideration: a. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT is right in reducing the profit estimated from 16% to 8% by CIT(A)? b. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT is right in deleting the disallowance made u/s.40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, of ₹ 5,47,500/- without discussing the merit of the issue, merely on the g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee is not reliable after rejection of book results, proceeded to make additions on the basis of gross profit rate. The CIT(A) in a detailed judgment came to the conclusion that the net profit of the assessee should be estimated at the rate of 16% of the contract receipts in all the assessment years. 4. The assessee dissatisfied with such decision of the CIT(A), approached the Tribunal. The Tribunal in the impugned order reduced the gross profit rate at 8% making following observations .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f under-sea project, whereas the work involved during the year was of under-sea project. In respect of tender documents, it was explained that the net profit embedded in the project was 11.11% as well as loss of 22.20%, which was verified from work order No.ED/C.E./MRW/Work-4-07/220 dated 25.4.2007 and work order No.ED/C.E.MRW/Work-1/07/218 dated 25.4.2007 respectively. 10. The DR has not disputed the above explanation of the assessee. 11. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version