Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. United Cargo Transport Services Versus CCE, Chennai-II

2015 (6) TMI 991 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Application for modification of stay order - seeking extension of time to make pre-deposit - Held that:- Since appellant was given final notice dated 11.02.15 to show cause why the appeal shall not be dismissed for non-compliance. Their miscellaneous .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

void of any merits and the same is rejected. Since sufficient time was given to the appellants to make pre-deposit of the amount and also final notice issued for dismissal for non-compliance and the appellants failed to comply the stay order dated 26 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ND SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER For the Respondent : Ms. Indira Sisupal, AC (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: R. Periasami Vide miscellaneous order No. 41045-41048/2014 dated 26.06.2914, the appellants were directed to pre-deposit an amount of ₹ 1,25 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the service tax department. The appellants filed miscellaneous application for modification of the above stay order. Vide miscellaneous order no. 41671-41672/2014 dated 24.09.2014, the miscellaneous application for modification of the stay orders wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

When the matter was called on 01.12.2014 none appeared on behalf of the appellants nor there is any proof for pre-deposit filed. The Ld. AR placed the verification report dated 24.09.2014 and directed to handover a copy of the verification report to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat on verification of records, the claim of the appellants that they have already paid an amount of ₹ 74,41,994/- which is to be adjusted against the pre-deposit ordered is not correct and stated that these payments made by the appellants were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to show cause the reason for non-compliance of the stay order on 18.03.15. The case was again listed on 23.04.2015 and again posted today. When the case is called none present for the appellants but the Ld. Counsel sent a fax dated 01.06.15 seeking f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version