GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 182 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION

2016 (2) TMI 182 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION - 2015 (326) E.L.T. 389 (Sett. Comm.) - Settlement of a case - Eligibility to avail the benefit of the SSI exemptions No. 8/2003-C.E - benefit of cum duty price - Held that:- The applicant has admitted duty liability on a cum-duty basis. The Revenue has not given any reason as to why cum-duty benefit may be denied. There is also no charge that the applicant cleared goods clandestinely nor is there any charge against M/s. Bata India that they procured good .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-applicants. The SCN only states that the co-applicants who are partners of the applicant are responsible for any activity in their factory premises. This is not sufficient to establish any culpability. - The Bench accordingly finds that the applicant has made full and true disclosure and has cooperated in the proceeding during the investigation as well as before the Commission. In view of above and the facts and circumstances of the case, the Bench settles the case under Section 32F(5) - im .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te arising out of show cause notice C. No. V(15)/Off/ADJ/CE/123/2013/11860, dated 31-7-2013 (in short the SCN ) issued by the Additional Commissioner of Custom, Central Excise & Service Tax, Kanpur (hereinafter referred to as the Revenue ). Sr. No. Name of the Applicants with address Settlement Application No. Date of filling 1. M/s. Naaz Leather Finishers, 14-A, 150 ft. road, Jajmau, Kanpur - 208010 (UP) (hereinafter referred to as the applicant or main applicant ) 4433 1-9-2014 2. Mr. Iqba .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Mr. Rais Iqbal, C/o M/s. Naaz Leather Finishers, 14-A, 150 ft. road, Jajmau, Kanpur - 208010 (UP) (hereinafter referred to as the co-applicant No. 4 ) 4437 1-9-2014 2. M/s. Naaz Leather Finisher, 14-A, 150 Ft. Road, Kanpur is a partnership concern and are engaged in the manufacturing of Leather Shoe Upper (falling under CSH No. 6403) for M/s. Bata India Ltd. and also manufacturing finish Leather falling under CSH No. 4107 or 4112 or 4113, 4114, 4115, which attracts nil rate of duty in the t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alance sheet for the period from 2008-09 to 2011-12, it was found that the applicant was also manufacturing and clearing finished leather falling under CSH No. 4107 or 4112 or 4113, 4114, 4115 of CETA, 1985 but did not include the sale value of finished leather, which is chargeable to nil tariff rate. Further on enquiry the applicant informed that they are manufacturing both the above said excisable items in the same premises. From 2011-12 they have started paying Central Excise duty on leather .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be included in availing/admissibility of the benefit of said SSI notification. 5. On enquiry from the applicant regarding supply of leather shoe upper to be supplied to M/s. Bata India Ltd. the applicant vide their letter enclosed the purchase order and a leather shoe upper on the inner sole of which Tarun was printed with ink. On perusal, it appeared that the applicant had manufactured said shoe upper in the brand name of Tarun as per the requirement of M/s. Bata India Ltd. and also since .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

value of clearances of finished leather has been taken into account although it attracts nil rate under the tariff but are excisable goods. Therefore no SSI exemption is admissible during 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11. 7. After completion of the investigations, the SCN was issued proposing :- (i) Central Excise duty amounting to ₹ 21,51,725/- for the period 2008-09 to 2010-11 should not be demanded and recovered, from them under proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 194 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uld not be imposed upon them under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 for not taking registration; 7.1 Penalty was also proposed on the co-applicant No. 1 , 2 , 3 & 4 in the SCN under the Act. 8. The applicant in their settlement application has submitted that the SCN demanded duty of ₹ 21,51,725/- from the applicant, which has been calculated in respect of clearance of leather shoe upper from the financial year 2008-2009 to 2010-2011, in terms of the Notification No. 8/20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he applicant s aggregate clearances were below 4 crore and clearance made in the financial year 2008-09 were within the exemption limit of ₹ 1.50 crore, no duty liability was made out against the applicant. Further in the financial year 2008-09 and 2009-10, the aggregate clearances are above 4 crore, as such the applicant is liable for duty from the first clearances and liable for duty ₹ 9,70,242/- only in the financial year 2009-10 and 2010-11, which has been arrived at after availi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under Section 11AB of the Act and the same may be accepted as having been paid upon admitted duty liability. (c) full immunity from imposition of penalty, prosecution and fine may be granted to the applicants. (d) That late fee/penalty for filing of returns may kindly be waived. 9. The applicant was served with notice for proceeding with the application on 4-9-2014 asking about the duty payable has been adjusted from Cenvat credit, and to explain as to how the Cenvat credit was available at .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

manufacturing the finished Leathers chargeable to NIL rate of duty. The applicant being under a bona fide belief that they are eligible for SSI exemption has not taken any registration and by way of SCN, it came to the notice of the applicant that SSI Exemption is not available to them. The applicant during the disputed period had purchased inputs and machinery indigenously and also imported inputs and machinery on payment of Cenvat and/or AED equivalent to Cenvat, which have been specifically .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct to the approval & directions of the Hon ble Bench. 11. The case was allowed to be proceeded with on 5-9-2014. The report under Section 32F(3) of the Act was called for from the Revenue. 12. The Revenue vide their letter C. No. V(15)Off/Adj/CE/143/2013, dated 20-3-2015 submitted that the main applicant is registered with the Central Excise Department w.e.f. 6-5-2011 having Registration No. AAABFN1189NEM002. They took registration only after requirement of taxable invoice to their .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment of M/s. Bata India Ltd. Therefore, the goods are branded and not entitled for exemption under Notification No. 8/2003, dated 1-3-2003. The duty liability upon the applicant is from 2008-09 to 2010-11 amounting to ₹ 21,51,725/- and not ₹ 9,70,242/- as claimed by the applicant. Further, the admissibility of Cenvat credit is governed by procedure/documentation as laid down in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which the applicant has not complied with. In these circumstances, the applicant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

finished leather and leather shoe upper for M/s. Bata India Ltd. The applicant was a SSI unit and was under the impression that there was no need for him to take Central Excise Registration as a SSI Unit, The applicant had started paying Central Excise duty on leather shoe upper from 2011-12. The department s contention that all excisable goods cleared from the factory of the applicant was more than ₹ 4 crore for the year 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 and therefore, SSI exemption was not a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, the notification benefit was admissible to them. As such, as against the SCN demand of ₹ 21,51,725/- the applicant had admitted the demand of ₹ 9,72,042/- on a cum duty basis. The ld. Advocate submitted that for the year 2008-09, the benefit of SSI was admissible to them as the clearance in preceding financial year had not crossed the stipulated limit. The ld. Advocate further submitted that it was a case of interpretation of notification and there was no suppression or misdeclara .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ctions 3, 4, 4A , 5A - SSI exemption related In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) (herein after referred to as the Central Excise Act) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 8/2002-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2002, published in the Gazette of India vide number G.S.R. 129(E), dated the 1st March, 2002, the Central Government, being .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nafter referred to as the First Schedule); and (ii) the special duty of excise specified thereon in the Second Schedule to the said Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (herein after referred to as the Second Schedule), as is in excess of the amount calculated at the rate specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table : the table of the notification is as follows : TABLE S. No. Value of clearances Rate of duty (1) (2) (3) 1. First clearances up to an aggregate value not exceedin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rances of all excisable goods for home consumption by a manufacturer from one or more factories, or from a factory by one or more manufacturers, does not exceed rupees three hundred lakhs in the preceding financial year, (amended to rupees four hundred lakh vide Notification No. 10/2005-C.E., dated 1-3-2005) 13.1 The effect of the notification is that if an assessee has an aggregate value of clearances of excisable goods of less than 4 crores in a particular year, the assessee becomes eligi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

brand name or trade name is explained as under : Explanation. - For the purpose of this notification (A) brand name or trade name means a brand name or a trade name, whether registered or not, that is to say, a name or a mark, such as symbol, monogram, label, signature or invented word or writing which is used in relation to such specified goods for the purpose of indicating, or so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between such specified goods and some person using such name or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gate value of clearances of ₹ 1.5 crores. 13.2 In the instant case, the Revenue has inter alia contended that the applicant is not eligible to avail the benefit of the SSI exemptions under the aforesaid notification on the ground that (a) the aggregate value of clearances, as per the balance sheets of the applicant, were more than 4 crores in the financial years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 and as such was not eligible to avail the benefit of the notification 8/2003-C.E. (b) the appli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essary to assess the evidence with regard to the contentions on brand name Tarun as it has a material bearing on the computation of aggregate value of clearance in the year 2007-08 and therefore on the eligibility of the applicant to avail the notification benefit in the year 2008-09. 13.5 The revenue has cited the procurement order dated 8-1-2013 from Bata India to contend that Tarun is a brand name belonging to M/s. Bata India. The applicant on the other hand have produced a letter from M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion from attendance at the hearing. In the absence of any refutation on this issue, the Bench accepts the evidence of M/s. Bata India that they do not own or sell any product under the brand name Tarun . 13.6 Accordingly the Bench holds that for the year 2007-08, the aggregate clearance of ₹ 3.6 crore, made the applicant eligible for availing benefits of the Notification 8/2003-C.E. in the financial year 2008-09. 13.7 Both the Revenue and the applicant have pointed out that the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aggregate clearance of ₹ 6,28,07,551/- crore, the value of clearance for the leather shoe upper for M/s. Bata India was ₹ 1,38,53,264/- crore. As such the applicant were well within the overall limit of clearance of ₹ 1.5 crore, where the duty under the Notification 8/2003-C.E. was NIL. The finished leather goods were in any case subject to NIL rate of duty. The applicant has therefore rightly contended that the there was no duty liability on them for the year 2008-09. 13.8&ems .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cenvatable invoices for their purchases, the applicant has argued that they had not taken registration earlier as they were under a mistaken belief that as the goods were not subjected to any duty they did not require any registration. This argument is not believable as they well aware of the Notification 8/2003-C.E. and their eligibility for the exemptions contained therein. Part knowledge and selective ignorance is a poor argument. The Bench accordingly holds that the applicant violated the pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he applicant on the other hand has produced invoices for their domestic purchase where payment of central excise duties is clearly shown. The applicant has also produced copies of Bills of entry and related documents as proof of import of capital goods. The scheme of Cenvat credit envisages avoidance of cascading effect of taxation and duty paid goods are procured, the assessee is allowed to avail credit of duty paid. The Revenue has not questioned the authenticity of these documents. As such th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t credit on duty paid documents relating to capital assets procured domestically and through import. 13.10 The applicant has admitted duty liability on a cum-duty basis. The Revenue has not given any reason as to why cum-duty benefit may be denied. There is also no charge that the applicant cleared goods clandestinely nor is there any charge against M/s. Bata India that they procured goods from the applicant without payment of duty. Under the circumstances the Bench holds that in terms of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for any activity in their factory premises. This is not sufficient to establish any culpability. 13.12 The Bench accordingly finds that the applicant has made full and true disclosure and has cooperated in the proceeding during the investigation as well as before the Commission. In view of above and the facts and circumstances of the case, the Bench settles the case under Section 32F(5) of the Act on the following terms :- Central Excise Duty : The total Central Excise duty in this cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version