GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 184 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

2016 (2) TMI 184 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT - 2016 (336) E.L.T. 493 (All.) - Denial of MODVAT credit - belated claim of credit - Held that:- In the instant case, it is not disputed by the department that the appellant was a new assessee. The appellant further contends that he was not aware of the Modvat Rules and, therefore, could not take credit. This fact has not been disputed by the respondents and, therefore, in our opinion sufficient reasons had been given by the appellant for the purpose of co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t allowing the application for availing the Modvat credit for the said period. The application for condonation of delay could not have been rejected by the authorities. - Decided in favour of assessee - Central Excise Appeal No. 86 of 2004 - Dated:- 21-1-2016 - Tarun Agarwala And Vinod Kumar Misra, JJ. For the Appellant : A P Mathur For the Respondent : CSC, Dr A K Nigam, K C Sinha, R C Shukla ORDER We have heard Sri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned cou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the present appeal are that the appellant during the material period in question was engaged in the manufacture of country liquor, Indian made Foreign Liquor, rectified spirit and denatured ethyl alcohol. The appellant was not aware of Modvat Rules and could not claim credit being a new assessee. When the appellant came to know, an Application dated 27th August, 1994 was filed claiming benefit of Modvat credit of duty paid on molasses for the period of 1.3.1994 to 20.7.1994 under Rule 57G of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

led an appeal which was also rejected by the Tribunal against which the present appeal has been filed. Having heard learned counsel for the parties we find that under Section 57G (5), credit cannot be taken by a manufacturer after six months of the date of issuance of any document specified in sub Rule (3), namely, on the inputs received by the manufacturer in its factory. Rule 57G (9)&(10) provides as under: (9) Where a manufacturer was, for sufficient reasons, not in a position to make a d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iling of such declaration; (ii) the amount of duty for which credit is sought has actually been paid on such inputs; and (iii) the inputs have actually been used or are to be used in the manufacture of final products. The aforesaid provision makes it apparently clear that if a manufacturer was not in a position to make a declaration under subrule (1) with regard to the availing Modvat credit but provides sufficient reasons, the competent authority under subrule (10) would condone the delay if he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version