Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Allen Diesels India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India & Ors.

2016 (2) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Refund of SAD - SAD had been paid, not in cash, but by utilising the DEPB scrip - scope of circular - whether ultra virus to the notification - whether, in the garb of circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs (‘CBEC’) New Delhi, the benefit granted under a notification issued in terms of Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (‘Act’) can be modified or amended. - Notification No. 102/2007 - what the circular stated was that refund of the SAD, which was liable to be made upon fu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

projected that the circulars which are subject matter of the challenge in the present petitions were issued to streamline the procedure and to remove ambiguities, in fact what the circulars seek to amend is Notification No. 102/2007-Customs itself by introducing an additional condition for being entitled to refund, which condition does not find place in Notification No. 102/2007-Customs. - Circular Nos. 6/2008, 10/2012 and 18/2013 issued by the CBEC could not have imposed an additional res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be legally sustained. - refund to be allowed - Decided in favor of assessee. - W.P.(C) 4665/2014 & CM No.9309/2014, W.P.(C) 4666/2014 & CM No. 9311/2014, W.P.(C) 4667/2014 & CM No. 9313/2014 & W.P.(C) 4970/2014 & CM No. 9940/2014 - Dated:- 1-2-2016 - S.MURALIDHAR AND VIBHU BAKHRU, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr. Puneet Agarwal, Mr.Deepak Anand and Mr. Sahil Kahol, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Ms.Astha Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Kamal Nijhawan, Senior Standing Counsel with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

September 2007 issued in exercise of the powers of the Central Government under Section 25 (1) of the Act, the additional duty of customs, known as Special Additional Duty ( SAD ), under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was exempted if the goods imported were meant for subsequent sale. If the SAD was already paid, the notification allowed exemption by way of refund. Para 2 of the notification specified the following conditions that were required to be fulfilled for availing the exemp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shall file a claim for refund of the said additional duty of customs paid on the imported goods with the jurisdictional customs officer before the expiry of one year from the date of payment of the said additional duty of customs. (d) the importer shall pay on sale of the said goods, appropriate sales tax or value added tax, as the case may be; (e) the importer shall, inter alia, provide copies of the following documents along with the refund claim; (i) document evidencing payment of the said ad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

including the SAD by using the duty entitlement pass book ( DEPB ) scrip. However, it appears that the Department was not processing the said applications for refund of SAD in terms of the above Notification No. 102/2007-Customs on the ground that the SAD had been paid, not in cash, but by utilising the DEPB scrip. The importers then made various representations. The Customs officials also sought clarification from CBEC on whether the refund could be granted where the initial payment of SAD had .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion, and hence, the conditions as prescribed only in the said notification will apply. All refund applications under the aforesaid notification shall be received by the concerned field formations in their Centralized Refund Section, and the applicants would be given proper acknowledgement. The status of these refund claims shall also be displayed in the online database of customs duty refunds maintained by the respective Commissionerates. ...... 7.2 In respect of the doubt that whether the stam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which was liable to be made upon fulfilment of the conditions of Notification No. 102/2007-Customs, would not be in cash but re-credited to the relevant DEPB scrips which were used for making payment of the SAD. However, even this proposed system of re-crediting DEPB scrip was unable to be given effect to. The Director General of Foreign Trade ( DGFT ) which issued the DEPB scrips apparently had no mechanism for re-crediting them through the electronic data interchange ( EDI ) system. 6. This le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tration of the re-credited duty scrips on the basis of consolidated certificate furnished by Customs should be allowed on manual basis . It was further stated: The facility of manual filing of Bills of Entry for utilizing the amount of re-credited CVD refund for payment of duty is also allowed. This facility has been extended up to 30-12-2010 as a one-time measure with a view to liquidate all such pendencies by that time . 7. Para 8 of Circular No. 27/2010-Customs issued on 13th August 2010 brou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ensuring expeditious grant of refund of 4% CVD in cash, the importers may be advised to make the initial payment of 4% CVD in cash. 8. The time limit for utilizing the re-credited DEPB scrips was extended by issuing further circulars. On 29th March 2012, Circular No. 10/2012-Customs was issued stating that no re-crediting of DEPB scrips would be done if the payment of CVD was done by using the DEPB scrip. While reiterating para 8 of the earlier Circular No. 27/2010-Customs, it was stated that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mber 2013. 10. As far as the Petitioner is concerned, it filed four refund applications on 8th October 2013, 22nd November 2013, 16th December 2013 and 21st December 2014. Each of the above refund applications was rejected by referring to both the Circulars No. 6/2008 and 18/2013 on the ground that payments were not made in cash, but by using the DEPB scrips, and therefore, the question of refund of SAD in cash did not arise. 11. This petition challenges the aforementioned circulars on the groun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n paras 4, 8 and 9 of the order dated 16th May 2014 rejecting the Petitioner s refund claims submitted on 22nd November 2013 it is noted that the Petitioner has satisfied all the conditions of Notification No. 102/2007-Customs. However, in the counter affidavit filed by the Respondent, it is stated in para 1 of the preliminary submissions that the order-in-original only refers to fulfilment of conditions (a), (b),(d) &(e) of Notification No. 102/2007-Customs. This submission overlooks para 8 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

make payment of the SAD only in cash and not by way of DEPB scrips, the Petitioner s applications for refund of SAD, to the extent it was not paid in cash, was rightly rejected. Reliance is placed on the very circulars which have been challenged by the Petitioner as ultra vires of the Act. It is in the above context the question arises whether the above circulars could have been issued restricting the entitlement of the importers and exporters to refund in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Cust .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lars were issued to remove the ambiguities and to streamline the procedures. 15. At the outset, the Court notes that Section 151A of the Act is for a very limited purpose of issuing of instructions to officers of customs for the purpose of uniformity in the classification of goods or with respect to the levy of duty thereon or for the implementation of any other provisions of this Act or of any other law for the time being in force, in so far as they relate to "any prohibition/restriction f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion 25(1) of the Act to bring about an amendment to Notification No. 102/2007-Customs to introduce a time limit within which claims for refund of the SAD should be made by importers. 16. Although it is sought to be projected that the circulars which are subject matter of the challenge in the present petitions were issued to streamline the procedure and to remove ambiguities, in fact what the circulars seek to amend is Notification No. 102/2007-Customs itself by introducing an additional conditi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

odifying a notification has come up for consideration before the Court earlier. In Sandur Micro Circuits Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, 2008 (8) TMI 3-SC, it was inter alia held that: A Circular cannot take away the effect of Notifications statutorily issued. In fact in certain cases it has been held that the Circular cannot whittle down the Exemption Notification and restrict the scope of the Exemption Notification or hit it down. In other words it was held that by issuing a circular a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation granting the exemption should itself say so. For instance, notification GSR 1089, dated 29th April, 1969 expressly stated that the benefit of the exemption was to be available only to those manufacturers who produce proof to the satisfaction of the Collector that such benefit has been passed on by them to whom they have sole the goods. Such a condition has to be a part of the exemption notification. For, the Notification is law . But, after enacting the law, such a condition cannot be impo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of refund stipulated under the principal enactment, i.e., the Customs Act, 1962. That would make the circular ultra vires the statute and beyond the scope of the Act, Rules etc. Circulars might depart from the strict tenure of the statutory provision and might mitigate rigours of law thereby granting administrative relief beyond terms of the relevant provisions of the statute, but the Central Government is not empowered to withdraw benefits or impose harsher or stricter conditions than those pos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version