Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 249 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (2) TMI 249 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (336) E.L.T. 679 (Tri. - Del.) - Area based exemption - notification No. 50/03-CE dated 10.6.2003 - denial of benefit as the appellant was not having electricity connection or DG set installed at the time of investigation - demanding duty along with interest and imposing penalty - Held that:- From the perusal of various documents, we find that appellants have installed machines which are evidence of manufacture of final products and they have license to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a certificate issued by the Department of Industries certifying that commercial production started with effect from 30.3.2010. - The supplier of DG set (on rental basis) has also gave the statement that he has given DG set on rental basis to the appellant. On the basis of this statement of supplier, the appellant has filed the affidavit and same has not been controverted by the adjudicating authority with cogent evidence. In the absence of any contrary evidence, the statement of supplier of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

50522 & 52262 of 2015 - FINAL ORDER NO.53543-53544/2015-EX(DB) - Dated:- 16-11-2015 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) And Mr. B Ravichandran, Member (Technical) For the Petitioner : Shri Sudhir Malhotra, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S Nunthuk, DR ORDER Per Ashok Jindal: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned orders demanding duty along with interest and imposing penalty on the appellant by denying the benefit of exemption notification No. 50/03-CE dated 10.6.2003. 2. The fact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ught to be denied. Consequently, the duty for the impugned period i.e. March, 2010 to March, 2014 was sought to be demanded by issuance of 4 show cause notices which were adjudicated by the impugned orders confirming demand of duty along with interest and imposition of penalty on the appellant. Aggrieved from the said order, appellant is before us.. 3. Shri Sudhir Malhotra, Advocate learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the appellant is a manufacturer of bulk drugs and filed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

madabad on 30.3.2010 through Omlogistic Transport. These facts are not in dispute. He further submits that office of the Superintendent Central Excise Range I, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan (HP)has given a report dated 19.4.2012 giving a finding that the appellant has correctly availed the benefit of notification. Further, the Asstt. Commissioner, Shimla vide letter dated 23.5.2012 also in his report held that documents produced by the appellant are OK and appellant has cleared their manufactured goo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nses in the balance sheet. Further, the affidavit has already been filed by the supplier of the DG set stating that the DG set was let out on rental basis to the appellant. This fact has not been contraverted by the adjudicating authority by any cogent evidence. He further submits that the appellant is a contract manufacturer and require a license to manufacture the drugs which has been obtained by the appellant from the Drug Controller with effect from 16.3.2010 and further medicines were allow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is to be set aside and the appeals be allowed. 4. On the other hand, learned AR opposed the contention of the learned Counsel and submits that in this case, the appellants were not having any electricity connection or DG set at the time of clearance of goods. Therefore, manufacturing / commercial production cannot be started without electricity. In these circumstances, the adjudicating authority has rightly denied the exemption in question and consequently, confirmed the demand of duty. 5. Heard .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version