Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s Suven Life Sciences Ltd, Hyderabad

2016 (2) TMI 264 - ITAT HYDERABAD

Interest under S.234B and S.234C - non payment of advance tax - whether CIT(A) has erred in deleting the interest charged u/s. 234B ? - Held that:- We are concerned with the previous year commencing on 1.4.2009 and ending on 31.3.2010. As per the decision in the case of Ajantha Pharma Ltd. V/s. CIT (2010 (9) TMI 8 - SUPREME COURT) assessee was entitled to deduction under S.80HHC for the purpose of computation of book profit under S.115JB of the Act, and therefore, assessee need not have to pay a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and S.234C need not be charged merely because there was variance between book profit computed based on retrospective amendment. The Learned Departmental Representative has not placed any decision of the higher forum wherein a contrary view has been taken on this issue. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the order passed by the CIT(A) does not call for interference. - Decided against revenue - ITA No. 1965/Hyd/2014 - Dated:- 23-12-2015 - D. Manmohan, VP And B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT Act. 3. The learned CIT(A) ought to have appreciated that though the relevant amendment to Sec.115JB was brought through Finance Act, 2011, the assessee has failed to file the revised turn of Income withdrawing the 80HHC claim from the book profit till the issue is noticed in the scrutiny proceedings. 4. The CIT(A) ought to have appreciated that the charging of interest u/s. 234B is mandatory which is with reference to assessed tax an there is no other provision in the Act to give relief for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

processed under S.143(1), it was later on taken up for scrutiny by issuing a notice under S.143(2). During the course of examination, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee reduced an amount of ₹ 3,15,18,576 from the book profit towards deduction under S.80HHC of the Act whereas no such deduction under S.80HHC was admissible from book profits. When called upon to explain, the assessee company submitted that the deduction was claimed in the context of Apex Court decision in the cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

disallowed derivative loss of ₹ 50,49,000 debited to the Profit & Loss Account on mark to market basis, stating that it was only a notional loss until the contract is settled. He also further disallowed a sum of ₹ 26,65,090 by applying Rule 8D of the IT Rules, by observing that the expenditure was incurred for earning dividend income, which is exempt under S.10(23) of the Act, and therefore, it attracts disallowance under S.14A of the Act. 4. The assessee submitted before the CIT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee company fell short of the income as per the amended law, and therefore, by no stretch of imagination, it can be held that there was any default on the part of the assessee in payment of advance tax in accordance with provisions of S.208 to S.210 of the Act, and consequently, the Assessing Officer erred in charging interest under S.234B and234C. Assessee also challenged other disallowances. 5. The learned CIT(A) observed with regard to disallowance of expenditure under S.14A of the Act, that i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion, if the transaction has matured. He therefore, set aside the disallowance. On these two issues, Revenue has not filed any appeal. 6. With regard to the main claim of the assessee about non-chargeability of interest under S.234B and S.234C of the Act, the learned CIT(A) relied upon the following decisions to observe that interest arises only upon default, and hence, it is in the nature of a quasi-punishment and in such an event, merely because when liability to pay interest arose due to retr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

interest charged by the Assessing Officer. 8. On the other hand, learned counsel for the assessee relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Quality Biscuits (284 ITR 434) to submit that interest under S.234B and S.234C cannot be charged if the income is assessed as per MAT provisions, and, at any rate, assessee could not have anticipated retrospective amendment to discharge the tax liability as per the amended provisions of the Act, and hence, it is not a fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version