GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 361 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (2) TMI 361 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (332) E.L.T. 865 (Tri. - Del.) - Admissibility of credit of service tax paid on input service used in the manufacture of exempted as well as dutiable goods - demand of interest and imposition of penalty - Held that:- The demand of interest is countered by the learned Counsel by putting forward the contention that the credit was reversed prior to the utilization. Opening and closing balance of the credit amount pertaining to the respective months substan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the other judgements cited and placed before us. Following the principle laid in these judgements, we hold that as the credit has been reversed before utilization, the demand of interest is unsustainable.

Imposition of penalty - Interestingly, it is seen stated in the show cause notice that the same is issued invoking the extended period of limitation. As per records, the department has come to know about wrongful availment of credit and informed the appellants the same on 9.8.2007. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sh the details regarding availment of credit, the appellants had furnished the same. On such score, we hold that the respondent have miserably failed to establish suppression or mis-statement with intention to evade payment of duty on the part of the appellants. Pursuant to the above reason, we are of the considered view that the imposition of penalty is unwarranted. - Appeal No. E/2181/2008-EX(DB) - Final Order No.53150/2015 - Dated:- 7-10-2015 - SMT. SULEKHA BEEVI C.S., MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oth dated 9.7.2004. The appellants were clearing dutiable as well as exempted products from their unit and were also availing credit of service tax paid on input service. The appellants did not maintain separate account as provided under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and the department therefore observed that the credit availed on the input service was not admissible to the appellants. The Range Superintendent vide letter dated 9.8.2007 informed the same to the appellants. On pointing out .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al amount penalty. Aggrieved the appellant is before us. 3. At the time of hearing, learned Counsel Shri Amit Jain submitted that though inadmissible credit is also challenged in the appeal, he presently confines his argument with regard to the demand of interest and imposition of penalty. He submitted that the appellant has reversed the credit on pointing out the same by the department. He placed reliance on the details of credit balance for the respective months and argued that the credit has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

STAT-DEL 4. With regard to the imposition of penalty, learned Counsel submitted that there was no suppression or wilful mis-statement on the part of the appellants. He drew our attention to the letter dated 4.7.2006 issued by the appellant to the department informing the department the intention of the appellant to make clearance under Notification No.29/2004-CE and 30/2004-CE both dated 9.7.2004. In this letter, the appellants also informed the department the manner of taking credit on inputs, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enalty. 6. Arguments advanced having been narrowed to the issue of demand of interest and imposition of penalty, we do not enter into the merit of the case. The demand of interest is countered by the learned Counsel by putting forward the contention that the credit was reversed prior to the utilization. Opening and closing balance of the credit amount pertaining to the respective months substantiates this contention put forward by the appellant. The judgements relied upon by the learned counsel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version