Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad Versus The Divisional Controller

2016 (2) TMI 368 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Tour Operator services - whether the vehicles operated by the appellant conform to the definition of tourist vehicle as provided in terms of Section 2(43) of the Motor Vehicle Act read with Rule 128 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules. - Held that:- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of Rule 128 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules. - No demand - Decided against the Revenue. - Appeal No. ST/53/2011-Mum - Dated:- 10-11-2015 - P. S. Pruthi, Member (T) And Ramesh Nair, Member (J) For the Appellant : Shri B Kumar Iyer, Superintenden .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ut of CESTAT remand back order in which the Commissioner was directed to examine whether the vehicles operated by the appellant conform to the definition of tourist vehicle as provided in terms of Section 2(43) of the Motor Vehicle Act read with Rule .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version