Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Raigad Versus Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd.

2016 (2) TMI 441 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Penalty levy - reliefs sought for by revenue is that the Commissioner's demand is under section 11AA whereas it should be under section 11AB - Held that:- On perusal of the said order, we find that the demand involved from the very same impugned orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri Hitesh Shah, Commr (AR) & Shri J C Patel, Adv For the Respondent : Ms Shilpa Balani, Adv ORDER Per Ramesh Nair This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against Order-in-Original no. 102/IDG(31)COMMR(ADJ)/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Revenue. In the Revenue's appeal one of the reliefs sought for is that the Commissioner's demand is under section 11AA whereas it should be under section 11AB. 2. Shri Hitesh Shah, learned Commissioner (AR) appeared on behalf of the Reven .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version