Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Vapi Circle, Vapi Versus National Lamination Industries

2016 (2) TMI 492 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Eligibility for deduction u/s 80IB - income from scrap sales - assessee is mainly involved in manufacturing activities - Held that:- If the main manufacturing activity is eligible for deduction u/s 80IB of the Act then receipt from sale of scrap generated in the process of manufacturing as well as the scrap from other items available in the manufacturing unit, then such receipts from sale of scrap shall come within the ambit of gains eligible for deduction u/s 80 IB of the Act. In the case of as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rajpal Yadav, JM, & Manish Borad, AM. For The Appellant : Shri Sanjay Agrawal, CIT, DR For The Respondent : Smt. Urvashi Sodhan, AR ORDER PER Manish Borad, Accountant Member. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of CIT(A), Valsad dated 21.02.2012 in appeal No.CIT(A)/VLS/130/11-12 for Asst. Year 2009-10. Assessment was framed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) on 19.08.2011 by Addl. CIT, Vapi Range, Vapi. The ground raised by the Revenue are as unde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d area as specified in the VIII schedule to the I.T. Act. The assessee filed its return of income on 29.09.2009 declaring total income of ₹ 22,68,68,410/-. The case was selected for scrutiny assessment u/s CASS in view of clause of the Action Plan Target for Asst. Year 2010-11. Notice was issued on 20.08.2010 u/s 143(2) of the Act and duly served on 7.9.2010. In response to the notice assessee filed various details. The Assessing Officer observed in his order that the manufacturing activit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld unusable products/material. Income of the assessee was assessed at ₹ 24,39,96,780/-. 3. The assessee being aggrieved, carried the matter in appeal before CIT(A). The CIT(A) after considering the contentions of Assessing Officer in the assessment order and the submissions of assessee accepted the claim of assessee and allowed the same by observing as under :- 5.3 Decision : I have carefully considered the observation of the A.O. in the assessment order and the submissions of the A.R. of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s allowed. 3. Aggrieved, the Revenue is now in appeal before us. 4. The ld. DR supported the order of Assessing Officer. On the other hand the ld. AR supported the order of ld. CIT(A) and submitted that the issue is covered in favour of assessee by the several decisions of the Tribunal (copies of orders placed on record) and even by the decision of Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Jikar A. Saiyed in Tax Appeal No.368 of 2008 dated 21/12/2013. Accordingly she requested that the i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case of ACIT vs. Standard Oil & Greases in ITA No.1584/Ahd/2011 for Asst. Year 2008-09 and the issue has been decided in favour of assessee vide its order dated 04/09/2015 by observing as under :- 5. Heard both sides. Records perused. The Revenue s only argument is in tune with the Assessing Officer s findings narrated hereinabove that the impugned scrap sales cannot be held to have been derived from asssessee s manufacturing activity as per the tribunal s order in ITA 3096/Ahd/2007 in its o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecent decision (2014) 42 taxmann. 403 (Guj) CIT vs. Jikar A Saiyed. Both views hold that income arising from sale of scrap is eligible for section 80IB deduction as derived from the manufacturing activity in question. We follow the hon ble jurisdictional high court against that of the learned co-ordinate bench and reject the Revenue s first substantive ground. 6. Further we find that the issue in appeal has also been dealt by Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Jikar A. Saiyed (sup .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Harjivandas Juthabhai Zaveri and Anr (supra). In the case of Harjivandas Juthabhai Zaveri and Anr (supra) while answering the question whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in allowing deduction under Section 80IB of the Act on the items (i) Job work receipt, (ii) sale of empty soda ash bardana, (iii) sale of empty barrels and (iv) sale of plastic waste. The Division Bench has observed and held as under: So far as question No. 5 is concerned, learned counsel Mr. Soparka .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is deducted from the cost of the raw material. He submitted that if the cost is reduced by deducting the sum so received, the profit will increase and ultimately, the total would be the same. He submitted that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal has rightly come to the conclusion that the items covered by question No. 5 are covered by section 80.I of the Act inasmuch the amount received can be said to have been received from the activities undertaken by the Assessee. He su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rdans. Instead of manufacturing if the assessee was doing trading activities I.e. dealing in raw material and if the assessee had sold the material on retail basis and earned amount by sale of bardans, then obviously this section will not apply. 5.0. The decision of this Court in the case of Harjivandas Juthabhai Zaveri and Anr (supra) has been subsequently considered by the Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sadhu Forging Limited reported in (2011) 336 ITR 444 (Delhi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the ambit of section 80IB. It was immaterial that the assessee was doing the job of forging also for customers and was charging them on job work basis or on the basis of labour charges. It would still be qualified as carrying on eligible business under Section 80IB. The activities of the assessee were in giving heat treatment for which it had earned labour charges and job work charges. It could thus be said that the assessee had done a process on the raw material which was nothing but a part and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version