Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax I, Chandigarh Versus M/s Empire Package Pvt. Limited

2016 (2) TMI 505 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Disallowance u/s 14A - whether ITAT is justified in law to hold that the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot exceed the exempt income, in the absence of any such restriction being there in the relevant section or rule? - Held that:- In the present case, when the assessee claimed that it had not made any expenditure on earning exempt income, the Assessing Officer in terms of sub section (2) of Section 14A of the Act was required to collect such material evidence to determ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o decide the same afresh in accordance with law after affording due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee

The view adopted by the Tribunal being a plausible view based on factual position and the relevant case law on the point, does not warrant any interference by this Court. Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue has not been able to show any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. - Decided against revenue. - ITA No. 415 of 2015 (O&M) - Dated:- 12-1-20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT is justified in law to hold that the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot exceed the exempt income, in the absence of any such restriction being there in the relevant section or rule? 2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the appeal may be noticed. The assessee is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of corrugate boxes and sheet. It filed its return of inc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ort, the Rules ). Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. Vide order dated 18.7.2013, Annexure A.2, the CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. Still not satisfied, the assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal. Vide order dated 18.6.2015, Annexure A.3, the Tribunal set aside the order passed by the CIT (A) and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer with the direction to decide the issue afresh in accordance with law. Hence the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rning exempted income, no expenditure has been incurred, disallowance under section 14A of the Act cannot stand. In the present case, when the assessee claimed that it had not made any expenditure on earning exempt income, the Assessing Officer in terms of sub section (2) of Section 14A of the Act was required to collect such material evidence to determine expenditure if any incurred by the assessee in relation to earning of exempt income. The income from dividend had been shown at ₹ 1,11, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version