New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 509 - ITAT MUMBAI

2016 (2) TMI 509 - ITAT MUMBAI - [2016] 46 ITR (Trib) 259 - Short deduction of tax at source - non deducting tax at appropriate rate - Held that:- We direct the Assessing Officer to verify whether taxes have been paid by the payees in respect of the amount received by them from the assessee and if upon such verification it is found that the deductees have paid tax on the amount received by them from the assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default. - Decided in favour of assessee for sta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

BER For The Assessee : Shri Ronak G. Doshi For The Revenue : Shri Shrikant Mamdeo ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. Instant appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 15th January 2014, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-16, Mumbai, for the assessment year 2009-10. Following grounds have been raised by the assessee:- GROUND I: 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of the AO in treating the Appellant as " .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ve paid taxes on their income shifted to the Department. 3. The Appellant prays that it be held that the Appellant is not 'assesse in default'. Alternatively, the AO he directed to verify, on the basis of declaration, whether the recipients have paid taxes on their income and pass an appropriate order. GROUND II: 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of the AO in holding the Appellant as "assessee in default" u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot deducting tax at appropriate rate. As per the information available with him, the Assessing Officer quantified the short deduction of TDS at ₹ 42,02,940. He, therefore, passed an order under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act, demanding tax of ₹ 42,02,940 and interest of ₹ 14,71,160. Being aggrieved of such order of the Assessing Officer, assessee preferred appeal before the learned Commissioner (Appeals). 3. Before the first appellate authority, challenging the order of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion stating that they have filed their return of income for the relevant financial year declaring the amount received as income and paid taxes therefore, the assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) and no demand for recovery of the taxes for alleged short deduction can be raised. In support of such contention, assessee also submitted the confirmation / declaration received from two recipients in respect of whom there was short deduction of tax. The learned Comm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Officer in treating the assessee as an assessee in default and raising the demand under section 201(1) of the Act. 4. The learned Counsel for the assessee reiterating the stand taken before the learned Commissioner (Appeals), submitted, the assessee having furnished confirmation / declarations from both the recipients to the effect that they have shown the amounts received in the return of income filed by them for the assessment year under consideration, there is no justification to treat the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ere was short deduction of tax in their return of income for the assessment year under dispute, the assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) as per the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P.) Ltd. v/s CIT, [2007] 293 ITR 226 (SC). Further, learned counsel submitted, if the Assessing Officer still had any doubt with regard to the fact, whether the receipts subject to deduction of tax has been declared as income in the return .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earned Departmental Representative relied upon the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals). 6. We have considered the submissions of the parties, perused the material available on record and the case laws cited by the learned counsel. Undisputedly, it is a case of short deduction of tax at source and not non-deduction of tax at source. As could be seen from the facts on record in respect of two recipient viz. G.E. Capital Services India and DSP Merrill Lynch Capital Ltd., assessee has deduct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

details of both the recipients along with their Permanent Account Number. As could be seen from the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals), though, he does not deny the fact that assessee has furnished confirmation from both the recipient companies but he has rejected assessee s claim by stating that confirmation letters do not specify whether taxes have been paid on the amount received and, if so, the date of payment of tax. In our view, the decision of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n assessee in default under section 201(1). If the Assessing Officer had any doubt with regard to the claim of the assessee that deductees have shown the receipts as income and paid taxes thereon, he could have made necessary enquiry as all necessary details relating to the deductee with their assessment jurisdiction have been furnished by the assessee before the Departmental Authorities. Without doing so, Assessing Officer cannot fasten the liability on assessee. The Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ficient details which would enable the Assessing Officer to verify the factual position have been filed before the Assessing Officer it was for the Assessing Officer, with his vast powers, to invoke them and have the details furnished by the assessee verified. In the present case the assessee has furnished the Permanent Account Numbers of nineteen parties and letters of confirmation have been filed from eight of them before the CIT(A). The Permanent Account Numbers would facilitate an enquiry to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ers, who may not be willing to part with their accounts and the details regarding their tax payments or returns of income to the assessee except confirming that the taxes have been paid. But when their Permanent Account Numbers are made available to the Assessing Officer, it would not be unreasonable on the part of the assessee to ask the Assessing Officer to have the payments verified from the records of the Assessing Officers within whose jurisdiction the payees are assessed. We are, therefore .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version