Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-09 Versus M/s. Tinna Finex Ltd.

2016 (2) TMI 526 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Addition under Section 41(1) - ITAT deleted the addition - Held that:- The loan transactions were on the capital account and the writing off the loan was also on capital account and did not find place in the Profit and Loss Account. Apart from this it has been found as a matter of fact that the respondent / assessee had not got the benefit of any allowance or deduction in the assessment for any prior year in respect of loss, expenditure or trading liability incurred by the respondent / assessee. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax v. Tosha International Ltd, (2008 (9) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT DELHI ). Since the issue on law already stands settled by the said decisions of this court, no substantial question of law arises for our consideration. - Decided against revenue - ITA 113/2016 - Dated:- 15-2-2016 - Badar Durrez Ahmed And R. K. Gauba, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Zoheb Hossain and Mr Dileep Shivpuri For the Respondent : Mr Pranjal Srivastava JUDGMENT Badar Durrez Ahmed, J (Oral) 1. This appeal has been preferred by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

company is engaged in the business of finance and export. In the year in question there was no business activity except for the receipt of interest and some hire charges. Against the gross receipts of ₹ 6,54,900/- the respondent company claimed an expenditure of ₹ 10,83,949/- resulting in a loss of ₹ 4,29,049/-. 3. During the assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer noted that an amount of ₹ 5,64,85,956/- shown as secured and unsecured loans as on 31.03.2008 in the b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions of Section 41(1) of the said Act and made an addition of ₹ 5,64,85,956/- to the income of the assessee and completed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the said Act by virtue of his order dated 28.12.2011. 4. As pointed out above, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer and found that Section 41(1) of the said Act was not attracted. Against the said decision, the revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s made the addition of ₹ 5.64 crores by invoking provision of sec. 41(1) of the Income-tax without stating how the provision are applicable to the assessee s case. Mere cessation of liability does not result into fit case of sec. 41(1) of the I.T Act. Assessee has submitted that assessee was not incurred any loss/expenditure/trading liability which is subsequently recovered by him is taxable as income in the year of recovery. We find that the assessee is squarely covered by the following j .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

30.10.2009 (ITAT Ahmedabad) (iii) CIT vs. Phool Chand Jiwan Ram (131 ITR 17) (Del.) (iv) CIT vs. Compaq Electric Ltd. (ITA No. 172 of 2011 dated 18.10.2011) (Karnataka HC) (v) CIT vs. Chetan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (267 ITR 770) (Guj.) (vi) Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. CIT (261 ITR 501) (Bom.) (vii) CIT-3 vs. M/s Cipla Investments Ltd. (ITA No. 6988 of 2012, dated 07.02.2012) (HC of Bombay) 8.4 We further note that it is well settled law that where no deduction / allowance has been made in resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has not disputed the facts brought on record by the assessee company. In our opinion, the liability of ₹ 5,64,85,956/- as on 01.01.2009 in favour of M/s Tinna Overseas Ltd., was no longer required to be paid in view of the settlement. Similarly the assessee had foregone the investment in the shares and loan totalling to ₹ 1,08,41,345/- as per the terms of the settlement. The net gain to the assessee is ₹ 4,56,44,611/-. The assessee has clearly established that the adjustments a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version