Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 543 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2016 (2) TMI 543 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - [2016] 91 VST 385 (Bom) - Levy of sales tax / VAT / CST - Stock transfer - Form-F - Interstate movement of final goods returned by a job workers to his customer, after job work - Scope of Section 6A of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (for short “the MVAT Act”) - Constitutional validity of Trade Circular No. 2T of 2010 dated 11.01.2010 and circular no. 16T of 2007 dated 20.2.2007 - Jurisdiction to issue Trad circular. - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on is not being issued by some States in the form prescribed, namely form 'F' and the dealer made all the efforts to obtain it but failure to produce it is not his fault, then, he may, as the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India clarifies, request the Assessing Officer to take that circumstance into consideration. If that request is made, the Assessing Officer can, depending upon the facts and circumstances of a particular case, pass such orders as are permissible in law. Therefore, we do not agree th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

head office to branch or vice versa, as these transactions do not amount to sale, but the legislature was mindful of the fact that a blanket understanding of this type encourages evasion of taxes. Rather, that facilitates it. Therefore, by an amendment, it stepped in and placed burden on the dealers to prove transfer of goods in such cases is not by way of sale. - Declaration referred to in sub-section (1) of section 6A of the CST Act shall be in form 'F' and the proviso thereto clarifies t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the Petitioner : Mr. V. Sridharan - Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Shah, Mr. Rahul Thakar, Mr. Puneeth Ganapathy, Mr. Jas Sanghavi and Mr. Aniket Ghosh i/b. M/s. PDS Legal For the Respondent : Mr. V. A. Sonpal JUDGMENT ( Per S. C. Dharmadhikari, J. ) 1) Rule in both Petitions. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2) By these Writ Petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks the following reliefs (WP/7400/2015):- (a) that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on 6A is inapplicable to interstate movement of final goods returned by a job workers to his customer, after job work. (d) In the alternative and without prejudice to prayer (c) above, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to declare that Section 6A is ineffective, incomplete and inoperative is of no avail. (e) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Respondents by themselves, their officers and subordinates (i) to withdraw and/or cancel impugned order dated 17.07.2015 passed by the Tribunal in appeal No. 447/2015 and impugned Assessment Order dated 14.08.2014; and (ii) to refrain from taking any steps or proceedings in pursuance of and/or in furtherance of and/or in implementation of the (i) impugned Trade Circular No. 2T of 2010 dated 11.01.2010 (ii) Impugned order dated 17.07.2015 passed by the Tribunal in Appeal No. 447/2015 and (iii) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of support catalyst, including activated charcoal support. It is stated that this is predominantly a process resulting in the production of recharged catalyst from spent catalyst. It is stated that the Petition relates to job work transactions. The Petitioner receives a specified quantity of spent catalyst from its customers from within as well as outside the state of Maharashtra. The Petitioner undertakes job work of converting the spent catalyst received from the customers into support catal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

talyst is set out so as to appreciate that the Petitioner undertakes job work transactions and for which excise duty is not required to be paid. 6) The entire details from para 9.1, therefore, are unnecessary for our purpose. 7) It is claimed that the Petitioner received notices from the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax under the provisions of MVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for short the CST Act ). Annexure 'J' is a copy of one such notice. 8) The Petitioner, during the co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etitioner urges that it filed an Appeal to the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax. An order on the stay application therein imposing a condition of part payment of ₹ 7,96,00,000/- under the CST Act and ₹ 35,00,000/- under the MVAT Act was passed dated 24th March, 2015. The Petitioner preferred an Appeal against this order of the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax dated 24th March, 2015 before the Tribunal and the Tribunal dismissed the VAT Appeal No. 447 of 2015 under the CST Act and order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#39;F' forms for the inter-State return of catalyst. Therefore, such movement of the catalyst back to the customers in other States will be deemed to be inter-State sales liable to be taxed in the State of Maharashtra as per section 6 of the CST Act, 1956. 11(b) The Deputy Commissioner has consequently levied tax on notional value of the precious metal recovered from the spent catalyst apart from the job work charges received by the Petitioners. 11(c) As a result, while the Petitioner has an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8 5 Total Demand 14,58,98,608 11(e) In paragraphs 11-12 of the assessment order, the Deputy Commissioner also takes an alternate ground that transaction amounts to outright sale. 11(f) Therefore, the Petitioner is challenging the legality and validity of the Circular No. 2T of 2010 dated 11.1.2010. 11(g) The statement of object and reasons to the CST (Amendment) Act, 1972 reads as under:- ..... Central Sales Tax is not leviable in respect of transactions of transfer of goods from a head office ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1) (as initially enacted) (omitting unnecessary words) reads as follows: S. 6A. Burden of proof, etc., in case of transfer of goods claimed otherwise than by way of sale:- Where any dealer claims that he is not liable to pay tax under this Act, in respect of any goods, on the ground that the movement of such goods from one State to another was occasioned by reason of transfer of such goods by him to any other place of his business or to his agent or principal, as the case may be and not by reaso .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tes that declaration referred to section 6A(1) shall be in Form 'F'. 11(j) The said 'F' form would be obtained by the transferee from his sales tax authorities and forwarded to the transferor/dealer in the dispatching state. Transferor would furnish it to his tax authorities in despatching State. This would be proof that goods had been actually received by the transferee. 11(k) It is clear from the emphasised portions above that section 6A contemplates only three transferees, viz .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er:- 12(5) The declaration referred to in sub-section (1) of section 6-A shall be in Form F. Provided that a single declaration may cover transfer of goods, by a dealer, to any other place of his business or to his agent or principal, as the case may be, effected during a period of one calendar month: 11(n) As is clear from the provision above, even the Rule prescribing 'F' form under the CST Rules, 1957 does not contemplate 'F' form between two independent principals. 11(o) Simi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in a transaction between two principals. 11(q) The Respondents had issued Trade Circular No. 16T of 2007 dated 20th February, 2007. By the said trade circular, the position about non requirement of 'F' forms in relation to job work transaction was clarified. It was also specifically mentioned in the circular that there is no applicability of section 6A of the CST Act, 1956 in the case of job work transactions executed on principal to principal basis. 11(r) This earlier trade circular 16 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

section 6A of the CST Act deals only with transactions between agent and principal to principal basis was not raised before the High Court. 3. In the trade circular dated 20th February, 2007, a view has been taken that when goods are sent to another state for job work, the transaction will normally be on a principal to principal basis. It is further stated in the circular that section 6A will have no applicability as regards the transactions where the goods are sent on a principal to principal b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

order of the Supreme Court in Ambica Steels. In fact, unnumbered para 3 of the order of Supreme Court and penultimate para of said order dated 31st March, 2009 of the Supreme Court dated 31st March, 2009 itself recognises that view taken by the Sales Tax authorities in U. P. is not the view taken by Sales Tax authorities of other States about applicability of section 6A(1) for a job work transaction. 11(u) Therefore, there was no reason for the Respondents to have changed their well-founded view .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n furnished by a dealer under sub-section (1) are true and no inter-state sale has been effected, he may, at the time of, or at any time before, the assessment of the tax payable by the dealer under this Act, make an order to that effect and thereupon the movement of goods to which the declaration relates shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), be deemed for the purpose of this Act to have been occasioned otherwise than as a result of sale (Emphasis Supplied) 11(w) Therefore, as cle .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessing authority. The requirements of an inter-state sale are only provided in section 3. Therefore, under section 6A(2) the assessing officer would have to establish the requirements of section 3 i.e. (i) a transaction of sale has taken place and (ii) the sale occasioned a movement of the goods sold inter-state. While section 6A(1) may aid in proving the latter, it will not dispense with primary requirement that a completed sale has indeed taken place. 11(y) If section 6A is interpreted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it is clear that section 6A(1) itself does not deem a movement to be a sale, but only aids in characterising an already concluded sale as an inter-state sale. 11(aa) Accordingly, section 6A is applicable only for an established sale effected by a dealer from wherever effected. It can never apply to goods returned after job work which never involves a sale. 11(ab) Therefore, section 6A was only meant to counteract avoidance of tax and not to authorise the imposition of a new levy on transactions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ement to be a sale. Thus, the movement will not be deemed to be a sale. In that regard, reliance is placed upon several judgments. It has been contended that movement when is covenant or incident of the contract of sale, the movement will be considered as linked to the sale. For such a transaction, section 6 will apply to levy tax on the same. Section 6A(1) is only aid in establishing connection between movement and sale. If there is no sale at all, such a link need not be inquired into. The wor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under section 6 on such inter-state sale. Therefore, section 6A clearly presumes the existence of connection between interstate movement and eventual sale by a dealer. Accordingly, when no sale by a dealer ever takes place in a transaction, such transactions clearly do not fall within the scope of section 6A. It was also submitted that two other sections 18A and section 22(1B) of the CST Act would throw light on this aspect and therefore ought to be noticed. There is elaboration of this argument .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t vs. Budh Prakash Jai Prakash, AIR 1954 SC 459. (ii) Balabhagas Hulaschand vs. State of Orissa, (1976) 2 SCC 44. (iii) Consolidated Coffee Ltd. and Anr. vs. Coffee Board, Bangalore, (1980) 3 SCC 358. (iv) Tata Iron and Steel Co. Limited, Bombay vs. S. R. Sarkar and Ors., AIR 1961 SC 65. (v) The State of Bihar and Anr. vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd., 1970(3) SCC 697. (vi) C. I. T., Bangalore vs. B. C. Srinivasa Setty, (1981) 2 SCC 460. (vii) Tata Sky Limited vs. State of Madhya Pra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

State of A. P., (2000) 6 SCC 579. (xiv)Patnaik and Company vs. the State of Orissa, XVI STC 364. (xv) Sentinel Rolling Shutters and engineering Company Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, (1978) 4 SCC 260. (xvi)Union of India vs. The Central India Machinery Manufacturing Company Ltd. and Ors., (1977) 2 SCC 847. (xvii) The South India Metal Works and Rolling Mills vs. The State of Madras, (1960) 11 STC 507 (Mad). (xviii) Vishweshwardass Gokuldass vs. The Government of Madras, (1962) 13 S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpany Ltd. vs. Union of India, 1981 (8) ELT 676 (Bom.). (xxiv) Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U. P., (2006) 5 SCC 624. (xxv) Sree Akilandeswari Mills (P) Ltd. vs. Commercial Tax Officer, (2004) 138 STC 397 (TNTST). (xxvi) State of Tamil Nadu vs. T. M. T. Drill (Private) Ltd., (1991) 82 STC 59 (Mad). (xxvii) Cheerans Auto Agencies vs. State of Kerala, (2011) 38 VST 488 (Ker). (xxviii) C. Mohammedali vs. State of Kerala, (2010) 31 VST 427 (Ker). (xxix) Sale Tax Commissione .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

radesh and Ors., (2008) 4 SCC 548. (xxxv) Merecer and Ors. vs. Craven Grain Storage Ltd., (1994) CLC 328, House of Lords. (xxxvi) Ariyaputhira Padayachi vs. Muthukumaraswamy Padayachi (1914) 37 ILR Mad. 423. (xxxvii) Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Kerala vs. Larsen and Toubro Ltd., 2015 (39) STR 913 (SC). (xxxviii) The Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax vs. M/s. Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., Sales Tax Application No. 10 of 2012 (Bombay High Court), dated 8th May, 2014. 15) On the other .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

td. vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. reported in AIR 2004 SC 2836. 17) Mr. Sonpal also relies upon the circulars and to submit that the understanding of the officer would not be decisive and conclusive. Further, the circular now impugned does not run counter to the legal position as enunciated. The enunciation of the legal position is that the CST Act contains in Chapter III provisions under the head Inter-State Sales Tax . Section 6 sets out the liability to tax on the inter-state sale and by s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

incipal as the case may be and not by reason of sale. If he has to discharge the burden, he must produce the material and which material can be accepted only after an inquiry and satisfaction is reached with regard to the truth and genuineness of the contents thereof. Read thus, the section presents no difficulty. Read thus, it is not absence of or non issuance of form by any State or practice adopted by that State which is conclusive. Nothing can be derived from judgment in the case of Ambika S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ose, namely sections 6 and 6A have not been interpreted otherwise or contrary to what is submitted above. The provision has not been diluted nor the presumption or rule of evidence enacted is commented upon or otherwise. 18) For the above reasons, he would submit that the Petitions deserve to be dismissed. 19) For properly appreciating the rival contentions, at the cost of repetition, we must notice the essential facts. The Petitioner does not dispute that it is manufacturer and job worker both. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arashtra and how the reprocessing is done. The spent catalyst are reprocessed and recharged and such transactions have been termed as job work/labour undertaken by the Petitioner. The Petitioner claims to have charged their customers only for this job work. In the assessment order, the Assessing Officer has held that the remarkable aspect of the entire process is that there is no one to one co-relation between the spent catalyst received and the fresh catalyst supplied to the customers. The Peti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that there is a sale of fresh Nickel/Palladium catalyst and consideration of the same is received in the form of processing charges plus spent catalyst which contain 97 to 98 per cent precious metal. That is how the Assessing Officer added the price of spent catalyst and processing charges received by the Petitioner to determine the sale price. 21) We are not required to refer to the Assessing Officer s order in further details, as, admittedly, appeal against the same is pending. The matter has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

recovery of precious metal may be as high as 97 to 98 per cent, but after the approval from the customers, the entire material received from the customers is processed for recovery of the precious metal and the same is further used in order to bringing into existence fresh Nickel/Palladium, which are fully charged or activated. 22) The Petitioner is finding fault with the approach of the Assessing Officer in not applying section 6A to this whole transaction, simply because the Petitioner failed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e or outside a State or in the course of imports into or export from India, to provide for the levy, collection and distribution of taxes on sale of goods in the course of inter-state trade or commerce and to declare certain goods to be of special importance in interstate trade or commerce and specify that restrictions and conditions to which State laws imposing taxes on the sale or purchase of such goods of special importance shall be subject. 24) Therefore, it is an enactment formulating princ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2(e) defines the term prescribed to mean prescribed by rules made under this Act and then comes section 2(g), which defines the term sale . Section 2(g) and 2(h) read as under:- 2(g) sale , with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means any transfer of property in goods by one person to another for cash or deferred payment or for any other valuable consideration, and includes,- (i) a transfer, otherwise than in pursuance of a contract, of property in any goods for cash, deferred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thereof for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration; (vi) a supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink (whether or not intoxicating), where such supply or service, is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, but does not include a mortgage or hypothecation of or a charge or pledge on goods; 2(h) sale price means the amount payable to a dealer as consi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the execution of a works contract, the sale price of such goods shall be determined in the prescribed manner by making such deduction from the total consideration for the works contract as may be prescribed and such price shall be deemed to be the sale price for the purpose of this clause. 25) Therefore, a perusal of the two definitions would reveal as to how unless the context otherwise requires, sale with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means any transfer of property in g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any sum charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of the goods at the time of or before the delivery thereof other than the cost of freight or delivery or the cost of installation in cases where such cost is separately charged. 26) Chapter II contains sections to enable formulation of principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce or outside a state or in the course of import or export. 27) Section 3 is the first se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re delivered to a carrier or other bailee for transmission, the movement of the goods shall, for the purposes of clause (b), be deemed to commence at the time of such delivery and terminate at the time when delivery is taken from such carrier or bailee. Explanation 2. - Where the movement of goods commences and terminates in the same State it shall not be deemed to be a movement of goods from one State to another by reason merely of the fact that in the course of such movement the goods pass thr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or purchase occasions the movement of goods from one State to another or that is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods. There are two explanations and explanation 1 deals with delivery of goods to a carrier or other bailee for transmission. That is to provide for commencement of the movement of goods. Then, by Explanation 2, it is clarified that merely because in the course of movement in the same State, the goods pass through the territory of any other State, then, that sha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le shall be deemed to have taken place outside all other States when the sale is determined in accordance with sub-section (2) of section 4. Subsection (2) comes in for the purposes of indicating that in the case of specific or ascertained goods at the time the contract of sale is made and in the case of unascertained or future goods at the time of their appropriation to the contract of sale by the seller or by the buyer, then, the goods are deemed to be sold inside a State. 31) Similarly, by se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, appoint, not being earlier than thirty days from the date of such notification, be liable to pay tax under this Act on all sales of goods other than electrical energy effected by him in the course of inter-State trade or commerce during any year on and from the date so notified: Provided that a dealer shall not be liable to pay tax under this Act on any sale of goods which, in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 5 is a sale in the course of export of those goods out o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

commerce has either occasioned the movement of such goods from one State to another or has been effected by a transfer of documents of title to such goods during their movement from one State to another, any subsequent sale during such movement effected by a transfer of documents of title to such goods to a registered dealer, if the goods are of the description referred to in sub-section (3) of section 8, shall be exempt from tax under this Act: Provided that no such subsequent sale shall be ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tered dealer, a declaration referred to in sub-section (4) of section 8: Provided further that it shall not be necessary to furnish the declaration referred to in clause (b) of the preceding proviso in respect of a subsequent sale of goods if, - (a) the sale or purchase of such goods is, under the sales tax law of the appropriate State exempt from tax generally or is subject to tax generally at a rate which is lower than three per cent. or such reduced rate as may be notified by the Central Gove .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rse of inter-State trade or commerce, to any official, personnel, consular or diplomatic agent of - (i) any foreign diplomatic mission or consulate in India; or (ii) the United Nations or any other similar international body, entitled to privileges under any convention or agreement to which India is a party or under any law for the time being in force, if such official, personnel, consular or diplomatic agent, as the case may be, has purchased such goods for himself or for the purposes of such m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of sale. - (1) Where any dealer claims that he is not liable to pay tax under this Act, in respect of any goods, on the ground that the movement of such goods from one State to another was occasioned by reason of transfer of such goods by him to any other place of his business or to his agent or principal, as the case may be, and not by reason of sale, the burden of proving that the movement of those goods was so occasioned shall be on that dealer and for this purpose he may furnish to the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ds shall be deemed for all purposes of this Act to have been occasioned as a result of sale. (2) If the assessing authority is satisfied after making such inquiry as he may deem necessary that the particulars contained in the declaration furnished by a dealer under sub-section (1) are true and that no inter- State sale has been effected, he may, at the time of, or at any time before, the assessment of the tax payable by the dealer under this Act, make an order to that effect and thereupon the mo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cordance with the provisions of general sales tax law of the State. 33) A perusal of sections 6 and 6A would indicate that by section 6, the liability to tax on inter-State sales is set out and by the amendment made to section 6 by introduction of sub-section (1A), it is apparent that a dealer shall be liable to pay tax under this Act on a sale of any goods effected by him in the course of inter-State trade or commerce notwithstanding that no tax would have been leviable (whether on the seller o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the goods are of the description referred to in sub-section (3) of section 8. Thus, the exemption is in specified case and that is why sub-section (2) contains a non obstante clause. However, there is a proviso and which requires furnishing of a certificate to the prescribed authority. The first proviso to sub-section (2) sets out this requirement and by second proviso, other requirement and to furnish a declaration referred to in clause (b) of the first proviso is dispensed with on the condi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(4) of section 6. 34) Section 6A deals with burden of proof in case of transfer of goods claimed otherwise than by way of sale. Split up for understanding the section applies in case there is a claim that there is no sale. In that case and on such claim, the burden of proof is on the dealer making such claim as this claim would relieve him from the liability to pay tax under the CST Act. That liability is in respect of any goods sold within the meaning of preceding sections. The dealer would hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

permit a declaration within the meaning of sub-section (1) of section 6A. Along with the declaration, the evidence of despatch of goods has to be furnished. If the dealer fails to furnish that declaration, then, the movement of goods shall be deemed for all purposes of the CST Act to have been occasioned as a result of sale. By sub-section (2) and despite the declaration being furnished, the Assessing Officer can make such inquiry as he may deem necessary with regard to the particulars containe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e movement has been occasioned otherwise than as a result of sale is subject to sub-section (3) of section 6A. 35) Mr. Sridharan has relied upon on the 4 trade circulars in challenging the circular dated 11th January, 2010. Firstly, we will reproduce the circular under challenge, which reads as under:- Office of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, 829, 8th Floor, Vikrikar Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai - 400 010 TRADE CIRCULAR To …................. …................. No. VAT/MMB/1008/15/Adm-6/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt and that it applies in those cases where the movement of goods is to the place of business of the dealer himself in another state or to his agent or his principal in another state. It was viewed that section 6A does not deal with transactions which are on a principal to principal basis. Hence, the non-sale transactions like job work which are transactions from principal to principal basis were viewed to be out of purview of section 6A of CST Act, 1956 and not requiring F Forms. 2. Thereafter, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ceived goods for job work or as goods return. This aspect has been elaborated in Trade Circular 5T of 2009 dated 29th January 2009. 3. The decision of Allahabad High Court in M/s. Ambica Steel Ltd. was challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In the brief order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court (24 VST 356) in this case, it is stated that the dealer agreed to produce the required declarations. Hon'ble Supreme Court has not done away with the need of mandatory F Forms applicable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Declarations in Form F will be issued to the dealers to comply with this view. 5. This Circular cannot be made use of for legal interpretation of the provisions of law, as it is clarificatory in nature. If any member of the trade has any doubt, he may refer the matter to this office for further clarification. 6. You are requested to bring the contents of this circular to the notice of all the members of your Association. Yours faithfully, (Sanjay Bhatia) Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

practice or does not issue declaration in that form, then, it would be necessarily held in the State of Maharashtra that the movement of goods is occasioned by sale. In that event, the burden on the dealer in terms of section 6A of the CST Act can never be taken to be discharged. That would be a travesty of justice. If it is not possible for the dealer to obtain the declaration in that form from another State for, that State may not follow this practice or refuses to do so for reasons beyond the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

T/Clarification/1006/202/Adm-3 Trade Cir. 16T of 2007 Mumbai Dt: 20.02.07 Sub: Tax Treatment of Goods sent to other States. Gentlemen/Sir/Madam, Queries have been received by this office regarding the tax treatment of Goods sent to other States. A dealer may send his goods to another State for various reasons. The goods may be sent for minor job work, extensive job work or for conversion or for manufacture. Apart from this, a dealer may send the goods to another State for sale or for otherwise d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act was amended in 1972 with effect from the 1st April 1973 by inserting a new section, namely, Section 6A. This section was further amended in 2002 by Finance Act, 2002. Section 6A of the CST Act deals with those contingencies where a dealer has sent any goods from one state to another, not by way of sale, to the places of his business or to his agent or to his principal. 3. (1) Section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 provides that where the dealer claims that he is not liable to pay tax .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

plicability where the goods are sent to another State for purposes other than those enumerated in that section. The word 'Agent' as used in this section means the Agent as defined in Section 182 of the Indian Contract Act. That Section reads as follows: 182. Agent and principal defined: An Agent is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealing with third persons. The person for whom such work is done or who is so represented is called the principal . (2) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

irect how the work is to be done. An independent operator is different from an agent or a servant. An agent, in the matter of agency, is bound to act subject to the direction and control of the principal. But an independent operator merely undertakes to perform certain specified work or produce a certain specified result. The manner and means of performance and production are at the discretion of the operator except in so far as they are specified by the contract. 4. Therefore, when a dealer sen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

asis, it will not be required for the dealer to obtain a declaration in Form 'F' from the person to whom the goods have been dispatched. Similarly, the amendment to Section 6A in 2002, which provides that where the dealer fails to produce the declaration in Form 'F', the movement of goods shall be deemed to have been occasioned as a result of sale is not applicable to 'principal to principal' transaction. 5. Section 6A, as of course its amendment in 2002, will apply, as s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 deals with reduction in set-off. Sub-rule (3) of this rule deals with the case where the claimant dealer dispatches any taxable goods outside the State, not by reason of sale, to his own place of business or of his agent or where the claimant dealer is an agent, to the place of business of his principal. If the goods are so dispatched, then in the contingencies described in the said sub-rule, the set-off available to the dealer is to be reduced as provided .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e sent to another State for job work or for manufacturing etc. on a 'principal to principal' basis. Subject to the other provisions of that sub-rule, the reduction in set-off will apply only when the goods are sent to another State, not by reason of sale, to the dealer's own place of business, or to his agent or where the dealer is an agent, to the place of his principal. 8. There would be contingencies where a dealer located in Maharashtra receives goods, not by way of purchase, fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly, (B. C. KHATUA.) Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Mumbai. ========== o x x o ========== 829, 8th Floor, Vikrikar Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai - 400 010 TRADE CIRCULAR To …................. …................. No. VAT/MMB/1008/15/ADM-6 Trade Cir. 5T of 2009 Mumbai Dt: 29.01.2009 Sub: Tax Treatment of Goods sent to other States. Ref: 1. Trade Circular 16T of 2007 dated 20th February 2007. Gentlemen/Sir/Madam, This office had issued a Trade Circular dated the 20th February, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

radesh for the purpose of converting them into iron and steel rounds, bars and flats. The converted material was to be sent back to the petitioner in Uttar Pradesh. The Petitioner Company also received iron scrap from various firms outside the State of Uttar Pradesh for the purpose of converting the same into iron and steel billets and ingots with a direction to return the converted goods to those firms. The issue before the Court was whether the petitioner is required to submit the declaration .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a view has been taken that when goods are sent to another State for job work or for manufacturing etc., the transaction will normally be on a principal to principal basis with an independent operator and not on a principal to agent basis. It is, further stated in the circular that Section 6A will have no applicability as regards the transactions where the goods are sent on a principal to principal basis. It is possible that in view of the judgment of the Uttar Pradesh High Court, dealers situate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s in Maharashtra. There is, however, no change in the views of the Sales Tax Department as expressed in the said trade circular. The Trade Circular will continue to apply for the contingencies laid down in the circular except for the change indicated above. 4. This circular cannot be made use of for legal interpretation of provisions of law, as it is clarificatory in nature. If any member of the trade has any doubt, he may refer the matter to this office for further clarification. 5. You are req .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax Act, 2002. Upon careful perusal of these Circulars, we do not find any support therein for the arguments canvassed by Mr.Sridharan. He would read some paras of the earlier Circular to mean that when a dealer sends any goods to another for manufacturing etc., the transaction will normally be on a principal to principal basis with an independent operator and not on a principal to agent basis. Section 6A will have no applicability as regards a transaction when goods are sent to principal to pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd lastly, as in this case, read as a whole, we do not find that the prior circulars lay down any absolute principles and as pressed into service by Mr. Sridharan. These circulars and all clauses and paras thereof would have to be read together and harmoniously. They would indicate that the trade has to be guided. True it is that in the circular of 29th January, 2009 in para 2, the judgment of the Allahabad High Court has been referred. Despite that judgment, the Department is reiterating the po .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion in form 'F' while returning the goods to Maharashtra. The Revenue, namely, the Departments in Maharashtra, therefore, decided to issue a declaration in form 'F' as per normal procedure to dealers in Maharashtra. 40) We do not see how a later circular of 2010 runs counter to the two circulars issued earlier or that their withdrawal by the ultimate circular of 2010 would adversely affect every dealer in Maharashtra. Mr. Sridharan is also not right in urging that the judgment o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s therein challenged the circular dated 28th November, 2005 issued by the Commissioner of Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, wherein it has been mentioned that under section 6A of the CST Act, form 'F' is required to be filed in respect of all transfer of goods which are otherwise than by way of sale and also applies to all goods sent or received for job work or goods returned. 43) The Petitioner therein was engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of iron billets and ingots. It w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

situate outside Uttar Pradesh for the purpose of converting them to iron and steel billets and ingots with a direction to return the converted goods to these firms. We are not concerned here with the credit and particularly the Cenvat Credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and under the Central Excise Act, 1944. In the case before the Allahabad High Court, however, the dealer, while claiming that he had not sent the goods as and by way of sale, but by wayof job work, filed a monthly return u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ilure, tax was demanded from the dealer by relying upon this circular referred above. It is in this context that the challenge was raised and the Allahabad High Court considered it. After referring to the rival contentions, the Division Bench presided over by Hon'le Mr. Justice R. K. Agrawal (as his Lordship then was) held as under:- We have given our anxious consideration to the various pleas raised by the learned Counsel for the parties. We find that, under Sub-clause (ii) of Clause (g) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eclaration Form F. The provisions of Section 6 and 6A of the Central Act came up for consideration in the case of Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu (2004) 134 STC 473 (SC); (2004) 23 PHT 81 (SC). Dealing with sections 6 and 6A of the Central Act, the apex court, in paragraph 33 of the Report, had held as follows: "….. Section 6 of the Act provides for liability to tax on inter-State sales in terms whereof every dealer is liable to pay tax thereunder on sales effected by him i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her provisions contained in the Act. Sub-section (2) of section 9, on the other hand, which is a procedural provision starts with the words 'subject to the other provisions of this Act and the Rules made thereunder'. Section 6-A provides for exception as regard the burden of proof in the event a claim is made that transfer of goods had taken place otherwise than by way of sale. Indisputably, the burden would be on the dealer to show that the movement of goods was occasioned not by reason .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cribed form obtained from the prescribed authority. Along with such declaration, the dealer is required to furnish the evidence of such dispatch of goods by reason of Act 20 of 2002. In the event, if it fails to furnish such declaration, by reason of legal fiction, such movement of goods would be deemed for all purposes of the said Act to have been occasioned as a result of sale. Such declaration indisputably is to be filed in form F. The said form is to be filled in triplicate. The prescribed a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the purpose of the said Act to the effect that transaction was occasioned otherwise than as a result of sale The apex court has, therefore, clearly laid down that, under section 6A of the Central Act, the burden would be on the dealer to show that movement of the goods had been occasioned not by reason of any transaction involving sale of goods but by reason of transfer of such goods to any other place of business or to the agent or principal, as the case may be, for which the dealer is required .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

job work, do not amount to sale would depend upon the contract entered into between the parties and would be the subject-matter of examination by the assessing authority. Even otherwise, under section 2(g)(ii) of the Central Act, transfer of goods used in execution of works contract is treated to be a sale: if the petitioner claims that it is not liable to tax on the transfer of goods from U. P. to ex-U. P., then it would have to discharge the burden placed upon it under section 6A by filing dec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e his case any further. Beforer parting with the case, we may, however, observe that as the petitioners have claimed that they are not liable to furnish declaration form F in respect of the transaction in question and we have come to the conclusion that they are, in fact, liable. We direct the respective assessing authorities to accept the declaration form F of each of the petitioners if they file it within a period of three months from today and to grant exemption in accordance with law. 44) Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

He further states that the assessee will file form F with the authority concerned within ten weeks from today. On expiry of the period of ten weeks the assessing officer will take up reassessment proceedings which will be completed within a period of three months, thereafter. At this stage, it may be mentioned that on the scope and applicability of section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, there exists difference of opinion between the various sales tax collectors in the country and theref .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

all be refunded to the assessee herein within a period of two weeks after the completion of reassessment proceedings, subject to adjustment, if any, in the duty assessed. We are informed that certain State(s) within whose jurisdiction the transferee is located is/are not issuing F forms. In such an eventuality it would be open to the assessing officer to complete reassessment proceedings on its own merits after examining the transaction between the parties, keeping in mind the circumstance that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gment and sought time to furnish a declaration in form 'F'. The time, in addition to the one granted by the Allahabad High Court came to be thus granted, as is clear from the first paragraph of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. The re-assessment proceedings were deferred for a period of 10 weeks so as to enable the dealer to furnish the declaration in form 'F'. All that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India recorded was divergence of views between several stat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

proceedings on its own merits and after examining the transactions between the parties and keeping in mind the circumstance that the Assessee is not in a position to obtain form 'F' for no fault of his. 46) We do not think that there is any ambiguity in the legal position. Further, we do not see anything ambiguous or vague in the circular issued by the State of Maharashtra after this judgment in the case of Ambica Steels Limited (supra) by both, the Allahabad High Court and the Hon'b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the declaration. If the declaration is not being issued by some States in the form prescribed, namely form 'F' and the dealer made all the efforts to obtain it but failure to produce it is not his fault, then, he may, as the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India clarifies, request the Assessing Officer to take that circumstance into consideration. If that request is made, the Assessing Officer can, depending upon the facts and circumstances of a particular case, pass such orders as are pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ifies is that if some States are not issuing 'F' form, then, that approach of a particular State should be brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer in the dealer's State. That the Assessing Officer should be convinced that the dealer made all efforts, but for no fault of his, he could not obtain the 'F' form. Thereupon and pursuant to the liberty given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the dealer raising the plea, the Assessing Officer, while taking note of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rought into the CST Act by insertion of section 6A. That is with a specific object and purpose. That is to emphasise that the Central Sales Tax is not leviable in respect of the transactions of transfer of goods from head office to branch or vice versa, as these transactions do not amount to sale, but the legislature was mindful of the fact that a blanket understanding of this type encourages evasion of taxes. Rather, that facilitates it. Therefore, by an amendment, it stepped in and placed burd .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mentioned in the proviso may suffice. 49) Therefore, we do not see as to how the section poses any difficulty or is in any way invalid or illegal. Advisedly, neither the provision is challenged nor the competence of the Parliament to bring in the section by way of amendment. Once the ambit and scope of the legal provision has been duly explained by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Ashok Leyland Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in (2004) 134 STC 473 (SC) and that judgmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n 6A(2) and analysed by Mr. Sridharan and in his written submissions at page 11 para 26.1 onwards would support our conclusion for, despite furnishing of the declaration in that form, a clear satisfaction has to be recorded by the Assessing Officer. That satisfaction can be recorded on such inquiry, as he is empowered to make within the meaning of sub-section (2) of section 6A of the CST Act. Therefore, there would be an opportunity to the dealer and within the meaning of this provision to convi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

these circumstances, all the paragraphs of the written submissions and supporting the oral arguments about the position prior to amendment by the Finance Act, 2002 and post such amendment of section 6A of the CST Act need not be dealt with seriatim, then, we need not go to other sections, particularly section 9(1) and equally section 9(2) of the CST Act. We also need not go to section 8 in further details. For, that deals with rates of tax on sales in the course of inter- State trade or commerc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e us. The Petitioner has ample opportunity to demonstrate and prove that the view taken by the Assessing Officer is incorrect and not sustainable in law. 52) We are also, therefore, of the opinion that in the light of the view that we have taken, the judgments relied upon by Mr. Sridharan, particularly on the point that only complete sales are exigible to Sales Tax and no tax is leviable where machinery provision is absent and need to be considered in further details. These principles are well s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

en and Toubro Ltd. reported in 2015(39) STR 913 (SC), particularly the reliance on paras 20 and 22 thereof need not be considered for the simple reason that it dealt with the scheme of taxing statutes. If there is no machinery provision, then, in their absence, the law is held to be vague and it would be arbitrariness to assess tax. However, these principles and in absence of a machinery provision would apply from statute to statute. For that, facts have to be noted and peculiarities of the tran .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version