Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle VI (3) , Chennai Versus M/s SPL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd

Disallowance of sub-contract expenses not supported by proper bills - Held that:- The only discrepancy noticed by the Assessing Officer is that the payments are not supported by the bills raised by the parties and only self-made vouchers were maintained by the assessee. In our opinion, considering the nature of work carried on by the assessee, there is no question of not incurring of expenditure by the assessee to carry on the road work contracts and the work is mentioned in the M book maintaine .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penditure claimed was not supported by proper evidence and some deficiency persist in evidence, part expenditure is disallowed on estimated basis. Being so, by placing reliance on the above decision of the Tribunal, the CIT(A) is justified in disallowing only 10% of the sub-contract expenses not supported by proper bills.- Decided in favour of assessee in part.

Addition made u/s 41(1) as cessation of liability - Held that:- Before coming to the conclusion by the Assessing Officer that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the debts are subsisting and it continues to be liable to pay the creditors. Therefore, it is not open to the Assessing Officer to draw the conclusion that the creditors have remitted the liability or that the liability has otherwise ceased without evidence or material when the assessee acknowledges a liability in the Balance Sheet and Explanation 1 is not applicable. Since the creditors are continued to be appearing in the Balance Sheet from year to year and the accounts of the creditors have n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on made by the CIT(A) is confirmed. - Decided in favour of assessee. - I.T.A.No.2488/Mds/2014 - Dated:- 14-1-2016 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri A B Koli, JCIT For The Respondent : Shri Philip George, Advocate ORDER PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-VI, Chennai, dated 30.6.2014 for assessment year 2010-11. 2. The fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onfirmation alongwith the copies of income-tax records from 15 parties in whose name the expenses are debited and also the details of the services provided by them alongwith invoices. The assessee vide letter dated 10.2.2013 furnished confirmation letters from each of 15 parties, the copies of bank statement of the assessee explaining the nature of work carried on by it as formation of internal road with gravel as subbase including cutting, dozing, filling to required level, removal of loose soi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

15 parties to appear personally with the relevant details. In response to the summons, none appeared before the Assessing Officer. However, the summon letters in respect of the two parties were returned stating that no such persons were existing in the addresses provided. The Assessing Officer accepted the letter of confirmation received from M/s Sakthi Kanna Construction Pvt. Ltd as genuine and held that the expenses debited in the name of other 14 parties as non-genuine. The Assessing Officer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction as TDS the assessee-company has benefited. He further observed that the PAN number quoted by two individuals in confirmation letter is not belonging to the same individual but to the different persons. On the basis of the above, the Assessing Officer held the expenses debited by the assessee-company to the tune of ₹ 4,41,08,210/- in the name of 14 parties as non-genuine and disallowed the same. 4. On appeal, the CIT(A) has restricted the disallowance to ₹ 44,10,821/- as against .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ounts. Some of the parities have also confirmed that they do not have invoice copies and maintain only M. Book which was retained by the assessee i.e M/s SPL Infrastructure Private Limited. The copy of the M. Book placed before me give the details of work done for particular period, measurement upto date of work done witn signature of the supervlsor of me company.11 parties have sent the details from far of places to the assessing officer through courier. One party namely M/s Sakthi Kanna Constr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an power is necessarily required. There is no evidence available on the record that the appellant had not executed the road work at Thermal Power Plant, Rathnagiri. The most of the labour contractors were either relatives of the appellant or known to the appellant. The entire disallowance made by the assessing officer in respective expense debited in the name 14 parties cannot be accepted without disproving the confirmations received, disproving the payments made to them beyond doubt, disproving .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earlier years. However the net profit declared by the appellant at 3.83% is less than the 5% of the Net profit accepted by the department in the earlier years. The 5% of the Net profit on the turnover of ₹ 3334.16 lacs comes to ₹ 166.7 lacs. The appellant had declared ₹ 127.53 lacs as Net profit. The difference comes to about ₹ 39.178 lacs. In the course of the appellant proceedings, the AR of the appellant had come out to offer 10% of the disallowance of RsA,41,08,210.0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

statement of the two persons who admitted that they had not carried out any work of the nature mentioned. In spite of the denial of the work carried out by Sri N. Erulappan and Sri S. Kesavan, on examination of the facts, the Honorable tribunal came to conclusion that the entire disallowance made by the assessing officer cannot be sustained and restricted the disallowance to 25% of the total claim of ₹ 22.10 crores. The Honorable Gujarath High Court in the case of Bholanath Poli Fab Pvt. L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

proved. The only fact was that the parties have not appeared before assessing officer for the summons issued to them but have given confirmation to the assessing officer. Since all the parties are known to the appellant, the appellant would have taken to the adequate steps for producing before the assessing officer for examinations. The net profit ratio declared by the appellant in the year under consideration is also less as compared to the net profit computed by the assessing officer in the ea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessing officer in the earlier years. Therefore, the assessing officer is directed to restrict the disallowance to ₹ 44,10,821.00 as against the disallowance of ₹ 4,41,08,210.00. The grounds of appeal raised by the appellant on this issue are treated as disposed off accordingly. Against the above, the Revenue is in appeal before us. 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. In this case, it is admitted fact that 14 persons have furnished confirmation and s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ficer through courier. However, there was no response from two parties. The assessee has taken the road laying work and also completed that work. Most of the payments are not supported by bills issued by the above parties. On the above reasons, the Assessing Officer disallowed ₹ 4,41,08,210/-. However, the CIT(A) considering the nature of business of the assessee and also chances of inflated expenses, sustained the disallowance to 10% of above expenditure. As seen from the fact brought on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cheques and the assessee has maintained the M. book which is signed by the sub-contractors. The only discrepancy noticed by the Assessing Officer is that the payments are not supported by the bills raised by the parties and only self-made vouchers were maintained by the assessee. In our opinion, considering the nature of work carried on by the assessee, there is no question of not incurring of expenditure by the assessee to carry on the road work contracts and the work is mentioned in the M book .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

claimed was not supported by proper evidence and some deficiency persist in evidence, part expenditure is disallowed on estimated basis. Being so, by placing reliance on the above decision of the Tribunal, the CIT(A) is justified in disallowing only 10% of the sub-contract expenses not supported by proper bills. This ground of the Revenue is dismissed. 6. The next ground is with regard to deletion of addition made u/s 41(1) of the Act as cessation of liability. 7. The facts of this issue are th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted the addition against which the Revenue is in appeal before us. 8. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has not issued any notice to the creditors to confirm from them whether they have given up their dues from the assessee. The assessee has also not written back these amounts in its books of account. Except for the fact that the amounts are outstanding, there was no material evidence to show that there was rem .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version