Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-11, New Delhi Versus M/s. Encore Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) - Held that:- It is only the payment by a company during the relevant previous year which could be brought to tax (when it satisfies other conditions of section 2(22)(e) as deemed dividend. The phrase used u/s 2(22)(e) is "any payment by company”. In case the AO's action is to be upheld, then the appellant becomes liable to tax every year as long as the opening balance of advance continues in his books of accounts. This could not be the meaning of section 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 72,618/- was expended on the same. An investment of ₹ 4.5 crores has been made during the previous year relevant to current assessment year and no fresh loans have been raised. There are fresh funds in the form of sundry creditors & advances from customers which more or less match with the fresh quantum of investment. The secured loan at the year end was Nil. All these facts go to show that the AO has not been able to show-that the borrowed funds have not been utilized for the purp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court] the action of the AO in invoking rule 8D was not justified. Despite the observation, the CIT(A) has upheld disallowance of ₹ 4,22,000 towards administrative expenses. In view of the above discussion, we find that the order of ld. CIT(A) on the issue in dispute is well reasoned and, therefore, no interference is required - Decided against revenue - ITA Nos. 138 & 139/Del/2014 - Dated:- 19-2-2016 - Smt. Diva Singh, Judicial Member And Sh. O. P. Kant, Accountant Member For the Appellan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lowing grounds of appeal: 1. The order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is not correct in law and facts. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has erred in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 55,14,626/- on account of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has erred in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 72,618/- under sect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ponse to the notice under Section 153A of the Act issued on 28.04.2010, the assessee filed return declaring income of ₹ 16,93,882/- on 29th October, 2010. Subsequently, notices under Section 143(2)/142(1) of the Act were issued and certain disallowances/additions were made by the ld. Assessing Officer. Aggrieved with the additions/disallowances the assessee filed appeal before the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved with th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ance in the books of the assessee company. It was further observed by the Assessing Officer that during the relevant previous year, the assessee company subscribed to the share capital of M/s. Sharad Enterprises pvt Ltd and acquired 13,332 equity shares out of 54,996/- equity shares of that company. The Assessing Officer was of the view that the share holding of the assessee company being more than 10 percent. and there was an accumulated profit in the books of M/s. Sharad Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e us, the ld. CIT(DR) relying on the order of the Assessing Officer submitted for sustaining the additions. No one represented on behalf of the assessee. 5.2 We have heard the submission of ld. CIT(DR) and perused the material on record. The fact that the advance in question was appearing as opening balance in the books of the assessee and the assessee became shareholder of the M/s. Sharad Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. during the previous year only, are not in dispute. We are of the view that the provis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s than 10% of the voting power . 4. The company was having accumulated profit. 5.3 But in the fact of the case of the assessee, the payment was received in a year prior to the relevant previous year and at that relevant point of time of receiving the advance, the assessee was not the beneficial shareholder of M/s. Sharda Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and thus the conditions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act are not fulfilled in the case of the assessee. The finding of the ld. CIT(A) on the issue are theref .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

during the year. The AO has added the opening credit balance standing in the name of Sharad Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. in the books of the appellant as deemed dividend. 4.3.2 The AR has pointed out that U/S 2(22)(e) only the amount received during the year as advance could be brought to tax as deemed dividend and not the amount which was received during the earlier period. 4.3.3 I agree with the submissions of the AR. It is only the payment by a company during the relevant previous year which could .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re of the opinion that no interference is required in the finding of the ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, we dismiss this ground of the appeal. 6. In ground no. 3, the Revenue has contested the deletion of addition of ₹ 72,618/- under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Act by ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(DR) relied on the order of the Assessing Officer. 6.1 We have heard the submission of ld. CIT(DR) and perused the material on record. The Assessing Officer noticed investment of ₹ 9,74,56,010/- on 31.03.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of the owned sources and no loan was taken for making those investments. The ld. CIT(A) has examined the disallowance even from the angle of Section 14A of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) accepted the submission of the assessee and allowed relief to the assessee. The relevant finding of ld. CIT(A) are as under: 4.4.1 The AO has made disallowance U/S 36(1 )(iii) of the Act on the ground that borrowed funds have been diverted for investment activity. It is seen that the appellant company's capital b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

377; 2.60 crores. 4.4.2 The appellant company had taken TOD (Temporary Over Draft) from Central Bank of India on which it has paid ₹ 72,618/- Bank of Punjab. The AO has not established in his order-that the borrowed funds have been diverted for making investment. In fact the AR has submitted that except for the TOD no loan was raised and just ₹ 72,618/- was expended on the same. An investment of ₹ 4.5 crores has been made during the previous year relevant to current assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot be made. The disallowance of ₹ 72,618 lakhs is therefore deleted. 7. In view of the above discussion, we find that the order of ld. CIT(A) on the issue in dispute is well reasoned and, therefore, no interference is required. Accordingly this ground of the Revenue is dismissed. ITA No. 139/Del/2014, AY 2010-11 8. The following grounds of appeal are raised in the instant appeal: 1. The order of Ld. CIT(A) is not correct in law and facts. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Assessing Officer, whereas none represented on behalf of the assessee. 10.1 We have heard the submission of ld. CIT(DR) and perused the material on record. The Assessing Officer observed that during the relevant previous year the assessee company has received dividend of ₹ 40,76,753/- and the same has been claimed as exempt from tax. On 31.03.2010, the assessee company was having total investment of ₹ 8,44,56,010/- , on account of which dividend was received. The Assessing Officer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ther submitted that the interest payment of ₹ 66,50,248 made during the year was related to the said loan of ₹ 4.57 crores taken during the financial year 2008-09 and has nothing to do with the investment made by the company. He, therefore, stressed that the action of the Assessing Officer in taking the interest expenditure for calculating disallowance under rule 6D was wrong and submitted that no expenses were directly linked with the investment of the company. The ld. CIT(A) consid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version