Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Man Structural Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Jaipur

Denial of cenvat credit with regard to the disputed goods - Held that:- In the case of Mastech Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2013 (5) TMI 241 - CESTAT NEW DELHI), this Tribunal has held that steel items used for fabrication of gantry rails on which EOT Crain runs, would be eligible for cenvat credit as input. In view of the decision in favour of eligibility of cenvat credit on the disputed goods, there is possibility on the part of the appellant to entertain the bonafide belief that credit is eligible .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked for denial of cenvat benefit to the appellant. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Excise Appeal No.E/396/2010 -EX [SM] - Final Order No. 50091/2016 - Dated:- 22-1-2016 - MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate For the Respondent: Smt. Ranjana Jha, D.R. ORDER PER: S.K. MOHANTY This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 21.01.2010 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise &a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation of supporting structures of various machines/machineries and also extension of the shed. The Cenvat Credit taken on those disputed goods was denied by the Central Excise Department on the ground that those goods are not conforming to the definition of either capital goods or inputs. 3. Shri Bipin Garg, the ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the disputed goods were used for erecting the structures to bear the load of five numbers of overhead cranes used in the appellants .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e notice was issued on 12.04.2008 for disallowing the cenvat credit taken during the period 2006-07, the same is barred by limitation of time. To support his stand that the show cause notice cannot be issued invoking the extended period of limitation, the ld. Advocate has relied on the judgement of Honble Gujarat High Court in the case of Commissioner of C. Ex., Cust. & S.T., Daman vs. N.R. Agarwal Industries reported in 2014 (300) E.L.T. 213 (Guj.) and the decision of this Tribunal in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has been rightly invoked for confirmation of the cenvat demand. 5. I have heard the ld. Counsel for both sides and perused the records. There were conflicting decisions by various judicial forum with regard to eligibility of cenvat credit on the disputed goods, where the same were used for fabrication of various machines/machinery installed within the factory. I find that in the case of Mastech Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (supra), this Tribunal has held that steel items used for fabrication of gantry .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Update Alerts     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version