GST Helpdesk Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (2) TMI 794 - ITAT KOLKATA

2016 (2) TMI 794 - ITAT KOLKATA - TMI - Validity of assessment - rectification of mistake - barred by limitation u/s. 153(2A) - Held that:- No assessment is possible after the expiry of period of limitation, the provisions of section 153(2A) of the Act are absolute and they impose a fetter on income tax authorities to make a set-aside assessment after the expiry of periods mentioned in this sub-section. This is a statutory fetter which is not for the assessee to relax or waive or vice versa. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

directed the AO to reframe the assessment afresh. This provision of section 153(3), in the given facts of the case, is subject to the provisions of section 153(2A) of the Act. In other words, if a matter falls u/s. 153(2A) of the Act i.e. if the Tribunal has set aside or cancelled the assessment, then the fresh order by the AO of assessment shall be passed within the period as prescribed u/s. 153(2A) of the Act. Here, in the present case, assessee's case clearly falls under the 2 nd proviso to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vir Singh, JM This appeal by assessee is arising out of order of CIT(A), Central-1, Kolkata in Appeal No. 197/CC-III/CIT(A)C-1/11-12 dated 21.01.2013. Assessment was framed by JCIT(OSD), Central Circle-III, Kolkata u/s. 254/143(3) & u/s. 263/143(3) of the Income tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for AY 2004-05 vide its order dated 08.12.2011. 2. The first issue in this appeal of assessee is against the order of CIT(A), that he has erred in holding that the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and the issue was restored to the A.O. for verification of certain facts, Ld. CIT(A) should have held the order as invalid for not following the directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal. (c) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. C.I.T. (A) has erred in holding that order u/s. 254/251/143(3) dated 08/12/2011 is within time and thereby dismissing ground No. 1." 3. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of operation of ships and filed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r ofCIT(A) before ITAT and ITAT vide its order dated 25.07.2008 in ITA No. 98/K/2008 set aside this issue and restored back the same to the file of the AO for deciding afresh by following ITAT's order in assessee's own case for AY 2001-02 wherein in para 9 held as under: "since from the perusal of share capital and reserve, it appears that reserve and surplus are more than twenty times of paid up share capital of assessee company, whereas section 33AC clearly debars the assessee fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

file of AO to decide the same afresh. We hereby clarify that it will be the onus of the assessee to produce relevant evidence and documents before the AO in support of its claim that the amount transferred till the financial year under consideration for the purpose of section 33AC does not exceed twice the aggregate of paid up share capital. We hold and direct accordingly and accept the ground raised by the revenue for statistical purposes." 4. The AO while giving appeal effect, framed asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in section 153(2A). I am unable to agree with the Ld. AR that the provisions of section 153(2A) are attracted in this case. The order of the Hon'ble Tribunal does not suggest any de novo assessment. The issue regarding allowability of deduction u/s. 33AC required verification of certain facts, and so, this issue was restored to the file of the AO. Therefore, the contention that the order was not passed by the AO within the prescribed time limit is not correct. Ground no.1 is dismissed." .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at page 1, 1st para, 1st three lines reads as under: "In pursuance of the Hon'ble ITAT, 'A' bench, Kolkata's order in ITA No.98/Kol/2008 dated 28.07.2008, a notice u/s. 142(1) was issued to the assessee on 16.11.2010, requiring clarification on the details of Reserves & Surplus as on 31.03.2004….." Ld. Counsel for the assessee before us stated that notice u/s. 142(1) on the assessee to give effect to the order of the Tribunal was issued on 19.08.2011 and in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the 1st day of April, 1971, and any subsequent assessment year, an order of fresh assessment in pursuance of an order under section 250 or section 254 or section 263 or section 264, setting aside or cancelling an assessment, may be made at any time before the expiry of one year from the end of the financial year in which the order under section 250 or section 254 is received by the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner or, as the case may be, the order under section 263 or section 264 is passed by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion 254 is received by the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner or, as the case may be, the order under section 263 or section 264 is passed by the Commissioner on or after the 1st day of April, 2005, the provisions of this sub-section shall have effect as if for the words "one year", the words "nine months"had been substituted:]" We find that recently a coordinate bench of this Tribunal Kolkata "A"Bench in the case of McNally Bharat Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. DCIT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nine months from the end of the financial year in which the order under section 254 is received by the concerned Chief Commissioner or Commissioner whereas sub-section (3) of section 153 provides that where the assessment, reassessment or re-computation is to be made on the assessee or any person in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained, inter alia, in an order passed by the Tribunal under section 254, same can be completed at any time without there being any ti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Assessing Officer and the appellate authority sets aside some of the issues to the file of the Assessing Officer, that situation would not give rise to "fresh assessment" attracting the provisions of section 153(2A) and in such case, the provisions of section 153(3)(ii) would apply. 7. We are unable to subscribe to the view taken by the ld. CIT(Appeals) in view of the various judicial pronouncements cited by the ld. counsel for the assessee wherein a contrary view is taken on a sim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acts of the present case, it was held by the Tribunal that the provisions of section 153(2A) would apply and the order passed by the Assessing Officer giving effect to the order of the appellate authority beyond the period prescribed in sub-section 153(2A) was barred by limitation. A similar issue had again arose in the case of Standard Meters Mfg. Co. -vs.- Addl. CIT (ITA No. 1665/PN/2007 dated 29.11.2011) cited by the ld. counsel for the assessee and it was held by the Pune Bench of this Tribu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tored by the Tribunal to the file of the Assessing Officer for consideration afresh in accordance with law. In these facts and circumstances, it was held by the Tribunal that the order passed by the Assessing Officer giving effect to the order of the Tribunal beyond the period specified in section 153(2A) of the Act was not saved because of the extended limitation provided under section 153(3) of the Act. In our opinion, the ratio of the decision of the Coordinate Benches of this Tribunal in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

missioner is invalid being barred by limitation. Accordingly, we allow the Cross Objection filed by the assessee and cancel the order dated 31.12.2009 passed by the Assessing Officer." 6. In view of the above facts and the case law of coordinate bench, cited supra, we are of the view that no assessment is possible after the expiry of period of limitation, the provisions of section 153(2A) of the Act are absolute and they impose a fetter on income tax authorities to make a set-aside assessme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version