Home List
← Previous	Next →

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- XI Versus AMAR KHOSLA

2016 (2) TMI 796 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Non-compliance with the legal requirements under Section 147 and the proviso to Section 151 (1) - ‘CIT’ has not recorded any satisfaction and has merely affixed his signature on the file without even putting a date or any other word in addition to su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

United Electrical Co. (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2002 (10) TMI 86 - DELHI High Court) - Decided against the revenue. - ITA 133/2014 - Dated:- 20-7-2015 - DR. S. MURALIDHAR & MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, JJ. For The Appellant : Mr. N. P. Sahni with Mr. Nitin Gulati, A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) the appeal filed by the father-in-law of the Respondent Assessee i.e. Tej Mohan Sachdeva is yet to be listed before the Court and that since the facts of both cases are inextricably linked, this appeal shou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

compliance by the Revenue with the legal requirements under Section 147 and the proviso to Section 151 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 inasmuch as the Commissioner of Income Tax ( CIT ) has not recorded any satisfaction and has merely affixed his sig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X