Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Bajaj Auto Limited, Aurangabad Versus Union Of India

2016 (41) S.T.R. 384 (Bom.) - Reverse change - the matter in issue was as to whether royalty paid/received as consideration for transfer of technology know how can form part of taxable value and whether the said issue would come within the province of rate of duty or to the value of the goods for the purpose of assessment as envisaged U/Sec. 35G is required to be considered. - Constitutional validity of sosecond proviso to Rule 6 and Rule 2(1)(d)(iv) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Held that:- whet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. 3968 OF 2002 With First Appeal No. 589 of 2005 - Dated:- 24-6-2015 - V. GANGAPURWALA AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mrs. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Arshad Hidaytullah, Senior Counsel i/by Mrs. Charuta S. Deshmukh, Advocate JUDGMENT PER S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. :. Both these matters are concerning same subject matter and are between the same parties, as such are dealt together. 2. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3968 of 2002 Bajaj Auto Limi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce Tax Act {Finance Act} (for short "Said Act"). This Court had admitted the writ petition by granting Rule on 29.10.2002. However, had refused the interim relief. As the interim relief was not granted, the proceedings pursuant to the said show cause notice impugned in the writ petition continued. The O.I.O. i. e. the office of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Service Tax Cell found the assessee i. e. M/s Bajaj Auto Limited liable to pay service tax and also imposed pena .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Hidaytullah, the learned senior counsel in First Appeal No. 589 of 2005 and Mr. Hidayatullah the learned senior counsel along with Mrs. C. S. Deshmukh, the learned counsel in Writ Petition No. 3968 of 2002 on behalf of assessee and Mrs. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, the learned counsel for the department. 4. The challenge to the show cause notice in Writ Petition No. 3968 of 2002 was based on various counts, so also validity of second proviso to Rule 6 and Rule 2(1)(d)(iv) of the said Rules. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ice the service tax is claimed from 07.07.1997 to 31.03.2002 is concerned, the same can be considered while dealing with proceedings pursuant to the said show cause notice. In the light of that, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. As far as First Appeal No. 589 of 2005 is concerned, the same assails the judgment of CESTAT. The appeal is filed under the provisions of Sec. 35G of the Central Excise Act as amended by the Finance Act 2003. 6. Mr. Hidaytullah, the learned senior counsel for the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

STAT has held that royalty is not subject matter of service tax. Right to use trade mark is a transaction in property and not in consultancy or advice and that no consultancy or advice is involved. It is a transaction of intangible property, so also technical assistance does not come within the ambit and purview of service tax. The dispute come within the purview of rate of tax. The learned senior counsel relies on the judgment of the Division Bench of Kerla High Court in a case of C.C.E. Manglo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ommissioner of Central Excise Aurangabad reported in 2007 (213) E.L.T. 658 (Bom). 7. Mrs. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, the learned counsel for the department strenuously contends that the appeal will have to be decided on merits as it is admitted. According to the learned counsel, if the S.L.P. is dismissed in limine or is withdrawn, the principle of merger does not apply. For the said purpose the learned counsel relies on the judgment of the Apex Court in a case of Kunhayammed and others Vs. S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the same. As per Sec. 65 of the Finance Act, tangible services in respect of consulting engineering means any service provided by a consulting engineer in relation to advice, consultancy or technical assistance in any manner in one or more disciplines of engineering. As per Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, more particularly it's second proviso, the assessee is liable. According to the learned counsel, the appeal is perfectly maintainable before this Court U/Sec. 35G of the said Act, as the dispu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and another Vs. Guwahati Carbon Ltd. reported in 2012 CJ (SC) 1491 and contends that the appeal U/Sec. 35G of the said Act shall lie to the High Court from the order passed in any appeal by the Appellate Tribunal. If the order of the Tribunal does not relate among other things to the determination of any question having relation to the rate of duty or to the value of goods, the dispute with regard to the assessable value is always maintainable before this Court. The learned counsel also relies .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erting to the contentions raised by the learned counsel for respective parties, it would be appropriate to refer to the relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 i. e. Sec. 35G as it stood then and Sec. 35L as under : THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 1. .......... 35. Appeals to [Commissioner (Appeals)]. 35A .............. 35G. Appeal to High Court( 1) An appeal shall lie to the High Court from every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal on or after the 1st day of July, 2003 (no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d eighty days from the date on which the order appealed against is received by the Commissioner of Central Excise or the other party; (b) accompanied by a fee of two hundred rupees where such appeal is filed by the other party; (c) in the form of a memorandum of appeal precisely stating therein the substantial question of law involved. (3) Where the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law is involved in any case, it shall formulate that question. (4) The appeal shall be heard .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

deliver such judgment thereon containing the grounds on which such decision is founded and may award such cost as it deems fit. (6) The High Court may determine any issue which ( a) has not been determined by the Appellate Tribunal; (b) has been wrongly determined by the Appellate Tribunal, by reason of a decision on such question of law as is referred to in subsection (1). (7) When an appeal has been filed before the High Court, it shall be heard by a bench of not less than two Judges of the H .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rovided in this Act, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), relating to appeals to the High Court shall, as far as may be, apply in the case of appeals under this section.] "35L. Appeal to Supreme Court.[( 1)] An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from [( a) any judgment of the High Court delivered ( i) in an appeal made under section 35G; or (ii) on a reference made under section 35G by the Appellate Tribunal before the 1st day of July, 2003; (iii) on a referen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or purposes of assessment. [(2) For the purpose of this Chapter, the determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty shall include the determination of taxability or excisability of goods for the purpose of assessment]" 10. This Court had framed the following substantial questions of law while admitting the appeal. (1) Whether royalty paid/received as consideration for transfer of technology know how can form part of taxable value ? (2) Whether M/s BAL are authorized per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ince of rate of duty or to the value of the goods for the purpose of assessment as envisaged U/Sec. 35G is required to be considered. 12. The CESTAT in the judgment impugned in the present appeal has held that right to use trade mark is a transaction in property and not consultancy or advice. It is a transaction of intangible property and in the present case, as per agreement the assessee has right to use trade marks/trade name of KHI as per article 7 of the agreement which deals with industrial .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

partment before the Apex Court. The Department withdrew the said appeal. No doubt, if S. L. P. is summarily dismissed, the theory of merger does not apply. There cannot be any dispute with the said proposition. However, it is not a case of dismissal of S.L.P., but it is a case of withdrawal of appeal with liberty to file appropriate appeal. The said judgment stands confirmed. 13. Even in a case of Sterlite Optical Technologies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Aurangabad referred supra, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version