Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s MFCI-OEN Connectors Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Cochin

2016 (334) E.L.T. 691 (Tri. - Bang.) - Valuation of machineries cleared to the job-workers - duty liability by the appellant as the value after availing benefit of depreciation - Held that:- As it is undisputed that the appellant has cleared the machineries to their job-workers from whom they got the goods manufactured. Such manufactured goods were brought to their factory for use and final products were cleared on payment of appropriate duty. It is responsible statement of the learned counsel, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

recorded that it is claimed by the assessee that the machinery was manufactured in 1996, but the said claim of the assessee is not controverted in anyway in the adjudication order. The first appellate authority was hearing the appeal filed by the assessee could not have come to a conclusion that the said machineries were indeed not manufactured in 1996, without any evidence. - Secondly, we find that C.B.E.C. in Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX. dated 1.7.2002 at point No. 14 while accepting the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

given as per the clarification of C.B.E.C - Decided in favour of assessee - E/214/2007-DB - Final Order No. 20022 / 2016 - Dated:- 11-1-2016 - SHRI M.V.RAVINDRAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHOK K. ARYA, TECHNICAL MEMBER For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Kannen, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Saxena, Commissioner (A.R.) ORDER PER M.V. RAVINDRAN This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 5/2007 dated 31.1.2007. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the rec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

w that the appellant has to discharge the duty liability on the machinery cleared. Acceding to the directions of the Revenues authorities, the appellant calculated the assessable value of the machineries by availing the benefit of depreciation as per the Central Board of Excise & Customs letter F. No. 495/16/93-Cus-VI dated 26.5.93 and discharged the duty liability. Revenue authorities are of the view that since the machineries were cleared to the job-workers, the appellant could not claim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ectly. In our considered view that it is undisputed that the appellant has cleared the machineries to their job-workers from whom they got the goods manufactured. Such manufactured goods were brought to their factory for use and final products were cleared on payment of appropriate duty. It is responsible statement of the learned counsel, that the machineries subsequently returned back to the appellant, though this position is not forthcoming from the records. In our considered view that the dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version