Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s MFCI-OEN Connectors Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Cochin

2016 (2) TMI 864 - CESTAT BANGALORE

Valuation of machineries cleared to the job-workers - duty liability by the appellant as the value after availing benefit of depreciation - Held that:- As it is undisputed that the appellant has cleared the machineries to their job-workers from whom they got the goods manufactured. Such manufactured goods were brought to their factory for use and final products were cleared on payment of appropriate duty. It is responsible statement of the learned counsel, that the machineries subsequently retur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee that the machinery was manufactured in 1996, but the said claim of the assessee is not controverted in anyway in the adjudication order. The first appellate authority was hearing the appeal filed by the assessee could not have come to a conclusion that the said machineries were indeed not manufactured in 1996, without any evidence. - Secondly, we find that C.B.E.C. in Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX. dated 1.7.2002 at point No. 14 while accepting the discharge of duty liability in respect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

E.C - Decided in favour of assessee - E/214/2007-DB - Final Order No. 20022 / 2016 - Dated:- 11-1-2016 - SHRI M.V.RAVINDRAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHOK K. ARYA, TECHNICAL MEMBER For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Kannen, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Saxena, Commissioner (A.R.) ORDER PER M.V. RAVINDRAN This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 5/2007 dated 31.1.2007. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the records, it transpires that the issue invo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he duty liability on the machinery cleared. Acceding to the directions of the Revenues authorities, the appellant calculated the assessable value of the machineries by availing the benefit of depreciation as per the Central Board of Excise & Customs letter F. No. 495/16/93-Cus-VI dated 26.5.93 and discharged the duty liability. Revenue authorities are of the view that since the machineries were cleared to the job-workers, the appellant could not claim the depreciation to discharge the duty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s undisputed that the appellant has cleared the machineries to their job-workers from whom they got the goods manufactured. Such manufactured goods were brought to their factory for use and final products were cleared on payment of appropriate duty. It is responsible statement of the learned counsel, that the machineries subsequently returned back to the appellant, though this position is not forthcoming from the records. In our considered view that the discharge of duty liability by the appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version