Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Man Structural Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE-Jaipur-I

2016 (2) TMI 868 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Demanding duty on scrap and waste generated during the course of fabrication of factory shed - Held that:- The metal which has been used for fabrication of trolley line cannot be defined as waste and scrap as per section note 8 to section 15 of Centr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ine cannot be the said unusable waste and scrap as such. Therefore, the appellant is not liable to pay duty thereon. Further, the trolley line cannot be classified under Chapter 72 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Therefore, the waste and scrap in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itioner : Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Ranjan Khanna, DR ORDER PER: ASHOK JINDAL Appellant is in appeal against the impugned order demanding duty on scrap and waste generated during the course of fabrication of factory shed. 2. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ultimately used by the appellant for fabrication of trolley line in their factory. Revenue is of the view that the appellant is required to pay duty on waste and scrap generated during fabrication of factory shed in their factory. Consequently, impu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ellant captively for fabrication of trolley line. Therefore, as per section note 8 to Section 15 of Central Excise Tariff Act, the impugned scrap does not fall under waste and scrap as waste and scrap defines the waste and scrap which is not useable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

they are not required to pay duty thereon. He, further submits that the ld. Commissioner (appeals) held that the trolley line which has been manufactured by the appellant falls under Chapter 72 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Therefore, the trol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der. 4. Heard the parties in detail and considered the submissions. 5. In this case, duty has been demanded on waste and scrap generated during the course of fabrication of factory shed which was ultimately used for fabrication of trolley line. There .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version