Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Lupin Limited Versus Asst. CIT-LTU, Mumbai And Vica-Versa

Set off interest on income tax refund received from interest on income tax paid - Held that:- The set off of interest paid against that received shall accordingly be subject to the two being for the same period, and to the extent of interest income for the said period. Two, the interest rate paid to the Revenue is higher than the interest rate paid by it. Now, without question, interest as an expenditure u/s. 57(iii), i.e., under which provision deduction in its respect is claimed and allowed, c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

’ borrowed and lent. True, the interest rates are not in the control of the assessee, but statutorily defined. That, in fact, is a basis on which we have opined of the interest suffered as being a statutory liability, unconnected with the earning of interest, so that it is not admissible as a deductible in the first place. However, even granting deductibility, the parameters of section 57(iii) do not admit of expenditure being incurred to sustain a predetermined loss, which again points to the e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lowing the decisions by the co-ordinate benches of this tribunal, we allow the assessee’s claim - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A. No. 4061/Mum/2011, I.T.A. No. 4338/Mum/2011 - Dated:- 17-2-2016 - Shri Joginder Singh, JM And Shri Sanjay Arora, AM For the Petitioner : Ms. Vasanti Patel For the Respondent : Shri Mohammed Rizwan ORDER Per Sanjay Arora, A. M. These are cross Appeals by the Assessee and the Revenue directed against the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-LTU, Mumb .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

duction for, the current year only. The Revenue, however, disallowed the claim as the assessee failed to substantiate its claim of the corresponding liability crystallizing during the year (refer para 3.2 of the assessment order). On a perusal of the claim, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) in fact found that most of the invoices in respect of the said expenditure were from April, 2006 to March, 2007, i.e., falling during the relevant previous year itself. In fact, even in cases where the invoices we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

claimable on the basis of a provision - making a reasonable and best estimate (based on the information available), that could be claimed on the basis of the amount as finally settled between the parties in-as-much as the liability to that extent could be said to arise or crystallize only in that year. Each year is a separate and independent unit of assessment (refer: CIT vs. British Paints India Ltd. [1991] 188 ITR 44 (SC)). The law in the matter is also clear, and toward which reference may be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gly, uphold the disallowance, noting the Revenue to have rather acted reasonably in-as-much as the disallowance is at net of income, which (income) would, in any case, stand to be taxed, i.e., either in the year of accrual or, as the case may be, receipt. We decide accordingly. 3. Vide the second ground, the assessee assails the disallowance of provision of expenditure on leave encashment at ₹ 283.24 lacs on the ground that the Hon ble Calcutta in Exide Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India [ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4. We have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. We are completely unable to, with respect, understand the assessee s case, which centers on the provision of section 43B(f) having been struck down in Exide Industries Ltd. (supra). True, but then, the Hon ble Apex Court, admitting the Revenue s SLP (No. 22889 of 2008) against the said decision, vide its order dated 08.5.2009 (copy on record), clearly states that during the pendency of the civil appeal the assessee shall pay tax a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment, where on a scientific, objective basis, is allowable as an expenditure (refer, inter alia, Calcutta Co. Limited (supra); Bharat Earth Movers (supra)). Section 43B of the Act, however, introduces a legal fiction whereby, notwithstanding the deductibility of any expenditure, specified vide clauses (a) to (f) thereof, it shall stand to be allowed as deduction in computing the business income only subject to actual payment. Clause (f) specifies a sum payable in lieu of any leave at the credit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arties, and perused the material on record. The first question …………. This leaves us with one argument, raised with reference to the constitutional validity to section 43B(f). We have for the purpose referred to the decision by the tribunal in the case of Birla General Finance (ITA No. 7530/Mum/2010 dated 23.01.2015/copy on record), as well as earlier decision in Essar Export and Production India Ltd. vs. Asst. CIT (ITA No. 6189/Mum/2011 dated 08.08.2012), the relevant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t inasmuch as the decision by the apex court, to follow which the restoration has been made by the tribunal, is yet to be delivered, i.e., is pending therewith, there is no adjudication by the tribunal per the said decisions, which, being based on a concession, do not even otherwise lay down any precedent (Lakshmi Shankar Srivastava AIR 1979 SC 451). Pending its final decision, which would be binding on all the authorities and courts, the only effective order is that by the apex court, staying t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3B(f) of the Income-tax Act, 1961? How, we wonder, the admission of a question of law by the hon ble court amount to either an acceptance of the tribunal s order, or even its negation by the hon ble court, to be of any assistance to the assessee. In fact, there is no dispute with regard to the import and the scope of the provision of section 43B(f). The only issue is whether the same shall continue to hold in view of the decision in Exide Industries Ltd. (supra) against which the Hon ble Apex Co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it in the contention of the ld. AR to restore the matter back to the file of the A.O. to decide in accordance with the final decision by the Hon ble Apex Court, an aspect also considered by the tribunal in Prembril Engineering P. Ltd. (supra). We, accordingly, find little merit in the assessee s case. We may though clarify that the Revenue relying on the admission of the appeal by it before the Apex Court in Exide Industries Ltd. (supra), it shall give effect to the decision by the hon ble court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

x paid. The assessee paid interest at ₹ 103.61 lacs under different provisions of the Act to the Income-tax Department. The same was set off against the interest received by the assessee from the Revenue (at ₹ 264.13 lacs) during the year on different refunds due to it by the Department. While the A.O. denied the assessee s claim for the said set-off relying on the decision in the case of Seth R. Dalmia vs. CIT [1977] 101 ITR 644 (SC), clarifying of interest being allowable for set-o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax Appeal No. 177 of 2012 dated 03.7.2014/copy on record). 6. We have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. The tribunal has allowed the assessee s claim in-as-much as, essentially and properly speaking, there could be only one account between two parties, being the assessee and the income-tax department in the instant case. Even the amount refunded to the assessee (on which interest is received/receivable) and that paid/to be paid, and on which interest is suffered on acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/ss. 234A and 234B, in-as-much as the same forms part of the demand raised, is exigible for interest u/s.244A on its withdrawal or, as the case may be, reduction and, consequently, refunded with interest. There is further nothing to suggest of any withdrawal of interest u/s. 244A, neutralizing the interest received to that extent. That apart, the payment of tax and, accordingly, liability toward the same is, as stated by the Revenue, not a business expenditure or a liability of the business, ent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7] 224 ITR 627 (SC). This would apply equally to the interest suffered on penalty as well. The interest receivable from the Revenue, on the other hand, is on the amount paid by way of tax (or qua any other liability under the Act), on account of it being paid in excess, i.e., than that in its respect as finally determined. The same, thus, assumes the nature of debt due to the assessee. The same being not a debt of the business, which appears to be only, or the principal source of income of the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t, the same only represent a statutory liability/s payable on account of tax or even interest or penalty, payable for offending any provision/s of the Act, or getting attracted in the facts of the case. There is, accordingly, no nexus and, rather, no question of it - the two being distinct and disparate sums, occasioned by separate events, arising by the operation of law. The nexus, the expenditure being of interest, could in fact only be of funds, which is completely absent in the present case, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e tribunal, so that, it, in fact has refused to exercise its appellate jurisdiction in relation to the said order, which arises only on it finding the impugned order to raise a substantial question of law. No ratio, which alone has precedent value and is judicially binding, consequently, arises out of the said order, which we have carefully perused; the findings by the Hon ble Court being at para 5 of the said order. Be that as it may, the only course available to us under the circumstances is t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eing: Would the conditions of taxability and deductibility in relation to a particular sum (interest in the present case) obtain even where it becomes both - due from as well as due to, the same party, with we having expressed our clear view that the conditions of taxability and deductibility, being regulated by law - based on the nature of the payments, are paramount, and the identity of the person, whether same or different, is of little consequence in law. So, however, and even as observed du .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the extent of interest income for the said period. Two, the interest rate paid to the Revenue is higher than the interest rate paid by it. Now, without question, interest as an expenditure u/s. 57(iii), i.e., under which provision deduction in its respect is claimed and allowed, could only be allowed to the extent of interest attributable to the rate at which interest is received from the Revenue. This is as nobody can be said to have borrowed funds at a rate (of interest) to earn interest incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: PROCEDURE FOR SHIFTED OF FINISHED GOODS FROM AP KARNATAKA TO UP

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version