Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Smt. A. Swarna Lakshmi Visakhapatnam Versus DCIT, Central Circle, Vijayawada

Addition on account of suppressed/unaccounted turnover - Held that:- The assessee has accounted all the receipts and reconciled the TDS certificate to the books of accounts and explained the reasons for the difference in turnover. The assessee further contended that the difference was accounted in the subsequent years and to this effect, filed necessary reconciliation statement. On verification of the paper book filed by the assessee, we find that the assessee has submitted accounts copies of ea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee. The A.O. simply quantified the difference between books of accounts and form 26AS. The assessee has explained the difference by furnishing necessary reconciliation. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the A.O. was not correct in making additions, towards difference in turnover without pointing out any mistakes in books of accounts, that too based on form 26AS. Therefore, we direct the A.O. to delete the additions towards difference in turnover. - Decided in favour of assessee < .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g the financial year. Therefore, we direct the A.O. to delete the additions made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A.No.655&656/Vizag/2013, ITA No.1/Vizag/2014 - Dated:- 22-1-2016 - SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri I. Kamasastry, AR For The Respondent : Shri G. Guruswamy, DR ORDER PER G. MANJUNATHA, Accountant Member: These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against separate, but identical o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ucted in the group cases of M/s. Maha Maruthi Logistics Pvt. Ltd., group of cases, Visakhapatnam on 4.2.2010. Consequent to the search, the assessee s case was notified to Central circle vide notification no. F.No. CIT(C)/CR/VSP/Centralization/2010-11 dated 18.2.2011. Consequent to the search, notice u/s 153A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as the Act ) dated 29.12.2010 was issued to the assessee calling for return of income for the assessment year 2008-09. In response to notice, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce and asked to explain why the same should not be treated as income of the assessee. In reply, the assessee submitted that the excess turnover quantified by you is because of the difference between the turnover accounted in the books of accounts and turnover as per the TDS certificates. The assessee further submitted that the excess turnover represents the advance received from the parties, on which the parties have deducted TDS as per the law. But, the assessee is following mercantile system o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

77; 25,53,769/-, therefore, the difference is added to the income of the assessee. 3. Similarly, the A.O. noticed that the assessee has debited various expenditures, on which TDS provisions are attracted, therefore, asked to furnish whether TDS has been deducted wherever applicable. In reply, the assessee submitted that as far as advertisement charges is concerned, these expenses are actually incurred towards daily allowances paid to drivers, trip expenses, oil and lubricants purchased for the v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e case of M/s. Merilyn Shipping and Transports Vs. ACIT in ITA No.477/Vizag/2008 dated 29.3.2012 no disallowance can be made for the amounts paid during the financial year. The A.O. after considering the explanations of the assessee disallowed the amount u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). Before the CIT(A) the assessee reiterated the arguments taken before the A.O. The assessee further submitted that the difference .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ywise reconciliation statement, explaining the reasons for difference. Similarly, as far as the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act is concerned, the assessee contended that the amounts incurred under these heads has been already paid during the same financial year and nothing is payable at the end of the balance sheet date. Therefore, no disallowance can be made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act as held by the ITAT, Visakhapatnam bench in the case of M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports (supra). How .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Ravi Prasad amounting to ₹ 3 lakhs, u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act and confirmed the additions made under the head advertisement charges and finance charges. 5. Aggrieved by the CIT(A) order, the assessee is in appeal before us and raised the following grounds: 1. The Ld. CIT(A) is not at all correct in upholding the assessment even though the assessment is not pending as on the date of search and none of the additions to the returned income are based any incriminating material. 2. The Ld. CIT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6,96,040. ii. Financial Charges - ₹ 5,29,800. 5. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend or alter any or all of the above grounds of appeal. All the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other. 6. From ground nos.1&2, the assessee has challenged the validity of assessment proceedings. During the course of hearing, the A.R. of the assessee did not press the ground nos.1&2, challenging the validity of the assessment. Therefore, ground nos.1 & 2 are dismissed as not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n statement wherein she has explained the reasons for the difference and contended that the difference is mainly on account of advance from customers which was not recognized as income of the year. The assessee is following mercantile system of accounting wherein she is accounting all income and expenditure on accrual basis. The difference represents advance, received from customers which was accounted in subsequent years. Therefore, the same cannot be considered as income for the year. On the o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e assessee further submitted that it is the usual practice that the customers have paid advance and deduct TDS on such advances. The assessee is following mercantile system of accounting wherein she is accounting all receipts and expenditure on accrual basis as and when bill is raised. The assessee has accounted all the receipts and reconciled the TDS certificate to the books of accounts and explained the reasons for the difference in turnover. The assessee further contended that the difference .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ile system of accounting and recognized the income on accrual basis. The A.O. has not pointed out any mistakes in the method of accounting followed by the assessee. He never rejected the books of accounts maintained by the assessee. The A.O. simply quantified the difference between books of accounts and form 26AS. The assessee has explained the difference by furnishing necessary reconciliation. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the A.O. was not correct in making additions, towards difference .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. It was the contention of the assessee that the expenditure incurred under these heads has been paid within the financial year and nothing is outstanding at the end of the balance sheet date. Therefore, no disallowance can be made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, in view of the special bench decision of ITAT Visakhapatnam in the case of M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports Vs. ACIT (2012) 136 ITD 23. The Ld. D.R. strongly opposed the contention of the A.R. and argued .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penditure attract TDS, but the assessee has failed to deduct TDS, therefore, disallowed the amount. The contention of the assessee is that the expenditure incurred under these heads has been paid during the same financial year and nothing is outstanding at the end of the balance sheet date and hence no disallowance can be made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Ld. A.R. during the course of hearing submitted that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered by the ITAT, Visakhapatnam special ben .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enue objection with regard to special bench decision of M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports (supra) and also considering the ratio of Hon ble A.P. High Court decision in the case of Janpriya Engineering Syndicate decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The relevant portion is reproduced hereunder: We have carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the record. Consistent with the view taken by the ITAT Special Bench Visakhapatnam and also in the light of the view expressed by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e CIT(A) has recorded finding of the fact that the expenditure incurred under these heads have been already paid during the financial year. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also respectfully following the coordinate bench decision in ITA No.657/Vizag/2010 (supra), we are of the opinion that no disallowance can be made on the payments which has been paid during the financial year. Therefore, we direct the A.O. to delete the additions made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Notification: Seeks to exempt goods imported for organising FIFA under 17, world cup, 2017

Forum: Wrong quote of GSTIN no of buyer in GSTR-1

Forum: Getting upload error message.Cannot upload json file for GSTR1 even after using offline tool V 1.2..

Forum: Issue of Payment Voucher

Forum: filing of unaudited financial accounts

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: need of extention of agm in case of non filing

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: INELIGIBLE INPUT TAX CREDIT UNDER GST REGIME

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Article: All about E-way Bill under GST

Highlight: Provision for sick leave liability - based on the basis of notional figures - such notional liability cannot be allowed as deduction - section 43B(f) is not applicable.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the amended provision of Explanation 5A made applicable w.r.e.f from 1.6.2007 cannot be pressed into service.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version