Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Late Shri. Sudeshkumar Devraj Mehta. Versus The ACIT Central Circle-10, Mumbai

Addition u/s 69A - Held that:- The assessee vide letter dated 09/11/2009 claimed that the amount in question had been kept out of his personal savings of the earlier years and the same has been reflected in the books of account. From the aforesaid facts it can safely be inferred that the money in question belonged to the assessee particularly in the light of the fact that the same had not been recorded in the books of accounts at the time of search. Under these circumstances, benefit of entries .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

planation given by the assessee in respect of payment allegedly made to Jain International trade Organization and other donations in question are not supported by any documentary evidence, therefore, there is no reason to interfere with the findings of the Ld. CIT(A). In our considered opinion the appellant has failed to establish that the remaining amount of ₹ 14,801/- was either spent exclusively for the purpose of business or given as donations within the meaning of 80G and is not entit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hich need necessary mention for disposal of this appeal are that the appellant is engaged in bullion trading and trading in gold & silver jewellery in the name & style of M/s Mandev Jewellers. There was search & seizure action u/s 132 on the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ) was conducted at the business premises of Shree. Sudhesh Kumar D Mehta on 04/03/2008. During the search 5990.890 gms of gold was found against the entry of 4975 gms in stock register. The excess stock of 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

zed under section 132(1) of the Act. 2.2 The appellant/assessee filed its return of income for the relevant Asst. year on 06/10/2008 declaring the total of income of ₹ 16,87,140/-. 2.3. During the course of assessment proceedings, the appellant was asked to disclose the nature, mode and source of possession of the aforesaid unexplained sum of ₹ 13,48,000/-. After hearing the contention of the assessee, the AO charge to tax the entire amount u/s 69A of the Act, as unexplained income o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

12,83,000/- by the department as my income just to avoid the litigation, mental harassment & for buying peace of mind as I am widow. I also request your honor and assessing officer not to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as special case in view of above circumstances which is normally leviable in ordinary course. 3.1 The Ld. CIT(A) after hearing the appellant held the excess amount of ₹ 65,000/- (Rs. 13,48,000 - 12,83,000 = 65,000/-) found during search to be an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

order on following effective grounds:- 1. The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by learned ACIT CC-(10), Mumbai of ₹ 65,000/- (Rupees Sixty Five Thousand Only.) without an jurisdiction & basis. The learned ACIT as well as learned CIT(A), Mumbai failed to appreciate/understand that appellant has established, beyond the doubt, that cash amount seized by the department was amount of his savings & was duly reflected in personal Balance Sheet & hence, required to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed. 4.1. Before us the Ld. AR has submitted that the assessee as already offered to ₹ 12,83,000/-seized during the such operation to tax. As regards the excess of ₹ 65,000/- Ld. Counsel of the assessee stated that the amount was kept out of personal savings of earlier years of the assessee which has been reflected in books of accounts. The assessee has filed the personal capital account and balance sheet along with the return of income. Therefore, the amount has wrongly been added to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies. Other expenses of ₹ 1500+2000+201+1100 amounting to ₹ 4,801/- are small amounts which were spent for business purpose only. 4.3 The Ld. DR on the other hand relied upon the concurrent orders passed by the Assessing Officer and the Ld. CIT(A) submitted that the appeal is not devoid of merit and the same may be dismissed. 4.4. We have heard the rival contention and also perused the material place before us in the light of the contentions of the parties. 4.5. A bare reading of sect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny source of income, and the assessee offers no explanation about the nature and source of acquisition of the money, bullions, jewellery or other valuable article, or the explanation offered by him is not, in the opinion of the Assessing Officer, satisfactory, the money and the value of the bullion, jewellery or other valuable article may be deemed t be the income of the assessee for such financial year. 4.6. In the present case the assessee was found to be the owner of excess money in question .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hri. Mithaial G. Jain and others corroborated the version of Shri. Navin Mody. Shri. Mithalal G. Jain also furnished a copy of affidavit dated 12/05/2008, submitted to the DIT(Inv) Mumbai confirming transaction of gold with the assessee through his employee Shri. Navin Mody and broker Shri. Bansilal Motilal Bohra. He also furnished the affidavits of Shri. Navin Mody and broker Shri. Bansilal Motilal Bohra in support of his version. The assessee was given opportunity to cross examine the said per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version