GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 1009 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (5) TMI 1009 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - 2015 (329) E.L.T. 419 (Tri. - Ahmd.) - Duty demand on fabricated structures for installation of plant and machinery - as per revenue the fabricated items cannot be classifiable under sub-heading No. 89.01 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - assessee opposed the demand as that the goods are not marketable and hence not excisable - Held that:- The onus lies with the Revenue in respect of the marketability of the product. It has also obser .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ase, we do not find any material that the structures constructed by the appellant for the purpose of construction of the jetty is commercially known as similar to pontoons in any market.

In view of the above discussion, we find that the demand of duty along with interest and penalty cannot be sustained. - Decided in favour of assessee - E/658/2007 - Final Order No. A/10505/2015/WZB/AHD - Dated:- 6-5-2015 - Shri P.K. Das, Member (J) and H.K. Thakur, Member (T) Shri Prakash Shah, Advoca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ir visit at the factory site, it was found that the steel structures were fabricated for construction of jetty for unloading the raw material at Tapti river side. According to the Revenue, the appellants manufactured the floating structures/pontoons and used as construction aids. A show cause notice dated.21-5-1993 was issued, proposing demand of duty of ₹ 20,41,074.37 along with interest and penalty on the fabricated structures for installation of plant and machineries. There is a further .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal. 2. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant contested the demand of duty on two counts mainly the fabricated items cannot be classifiable under sub-heading No. 89.01 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The other ground is that the Revenue failed to establish the marketability of the temporary structures, for construction of the jetty. He relied upon the various decisions and filed a compilati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

question are capable of being marketed/sold. He further submits that the appellants failed to discharge the burden of proof that the goods are not marketable. He relied upon the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of A.P. Electricity Board v. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad [1994 (70) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)] and the case of Indian Cable Co. Ltd v. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta [1994 (74) E.L.T. 22 (S.C.)]. 4. After hearing both the sides and perusal of the records, we fin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Revenue, it is like pontoons. We find that the Chapter Heading 89.07 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 covers Other floating structures (for example, rafts, tanks, coffer-dams, landing-stages, buoys and beacons). The Note to Heading 89.07 of HSN provides pontoons of the hollow cylinder type used for the support of temporary bridges, etc. But pontoons having the character of vessels are excluded. 5. We find that there is no dispute on the fact that the appellant constructed the temporary .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ctual sale is not necessary for the purpose of marketability. The learned Advocate submits that the Hon ble Supreme Court has over-ruled the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara [2005 (184) E.L.T. 128 (S.C.)], wherein it has been held as under :- 5. This view as has been recently reiterated in the decision of Union of India & Ors. v. Sonic Electrochem (P) Ltd. 2002 (7) SCC 435 where this Court was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

form nor in the shape or condition in which the manufactured articles are to be found, it is the commercial identity of the articles known to the market for being bought and sold. The fact that the product in question is generally not being bought and sold or has no demand in the market would be irrelevant. The plastic body of EMR does not satisfy the aforementioned criteria. There are some competing manufacturers of EMR. Each is having a different plastic body to suit its design and requirement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 The onus was on the Revenue. The only piece of evidence which has been produced by the Revenue was a test report which merely stated that the sample showed that the items were organic chemicals. It does not in any way establish marketability. Nor can marketability be established on the basis of mere stability. Something more would have to be shown to establish that DECA AND CMBE were known in the market as commercial products. 8. The Tribunal has ignored the evidence given by the empl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is dutiable or exigible, it was for the Revenue to prove that the product was marketable or was capable of being marketed. Manufacturing activity, by itself, does not prove the marketability. The product produced must be a distinct commodity known in the common parlance to the commercial community for the purpose of buying and selling. Since there is no evidence of either buying or selling in the present case, it cannot be held that the product in question was marketable or was capable of being .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version