Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Shriram Holographics Versus CCE, Noida

2016 (3) TMI 128 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Assessable value - Mastering Charges not included in the assessable value for payment of excise duty on holograms - Held that:- Regarding the appellant’s contention that there could be no amortization of these charges in view of the indefinite life span of the master is not directly relevant as the appellant themselves are admitting that these “master charges” are collected for producing specific holograms for their clients and the masters are returned to the clients once the required supplies a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mited to a specific issue and the other aspects like valuation, etc. were not examined. It is a fact that at least some of the documents relevant to the present demand were available with the Department in March, 2000 itself and hence, we find that the demand for extended period invoking suppression, fraud, collusion, etc. is not sustainable in this case. Accordingly, we restrict the demand to the normal period holding that the demand for extended period is not sustainable. - Excise Appeal No. E .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le value for payment of excise duty on holograms. 2. Proceedings were initiated against the appellants, which resulted in confirmation of demand of ₹ 11,02,470/- and penalty of equal amount. On appeal being filed, the original order was upheld by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals). Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant is before us. 3. In the appeal, they have pleaded that the master developed by them for the holograms has indefinite life and as such, could not be proportionately loaded t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

records. 5. During the arguments, ld. Counsel for the appellants reiterated their grounds of appeal. He further stated that the cost of the masters cannot be amortized as the same has unlimited life span. He further pleaded that DGCEI officers, who conducted the verification of their records in March, 2000 itself, were well aware of the transactions relating to the collection of mastering charges and as such, the demand is hit by time bar. 6. Ld. AR on the other hand reiterated the findings of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eloping masters to produce a particular design of hologram as per the specifications of the clients. These charges are specifically attributable and linked to the hologram developed and produced specifically for different clients. These charges are rightly includible in the assessable value as they are to be considered as part and parcel of the value of the finished excisable goods in terms of Section 4 read with Rule 6 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. 9. Regarding the appellant s co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version