Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Anand Construction Company Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur

2015 (4) TMI 1070 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Refund claim - Commercial or Industrial Construction Services - Appellant constructed building being used as the hostel for the residence of students studying in medical institute and contended that they are not covered under any of the taxable category - Held that: the building constructed was used as hostel for the residence of students studying in medical institute and was not for any other purpose. So, by taking the facts of Board Circular No. 80/10/2004-S.T., dated 10.9.2004, which clearly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ble being, non-commercial in nature. Therefore, service tax was not liable on appellant and as it has wrongly paid, can claim for refund. - Decided in favour of appellant with consequential relief - Appeal No. ST/562/2010-Mum. - ORDER NO.A/1004/15/STB - Dated:- 15-4-2015 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Mr. P.S.Pruthi, Member (Technical) Shri A.V. Naik, Advocate, for the Appellant Shri A.B. Kulgod, Assistant Commissioner (A.R) for the respondent JUDGEMENT Per : M.V. Ravindran This app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vered under any of the taxable category as the construction undertaken by them was in respect of hostel for the medical institute, they filed refund claim. On receipt of such refund claim, lower authorities have issued two show cause notices for the period April 2008 to September 2008 demanded service tax along with interest. On the premise that the appellant has not produced any evidence with regard to the building constructed by them is not to be used for commercial or industrial purpose. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llant is not eligible for the refund as he has correctly paid the tax. We find that the impugned order is incorrect as this Bench vide final Order dt. 26.9.2012 held as under: Considering the fact that building is constructed as hostel for the residence of students studying in medical institute and there is no allegation that the building is being used for any other purpose. In fat set of facts, the Board Circular No. 80/10/2004-S.T., dated 10.9.2004 is applicable to the facts of this case which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version