Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Bindal Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Customs, Noida

2016 (3) TMI 192 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Setting aside of Redemption fine and penalty - Appellant imported CR coils but it appears that shipper have wrongly dispatched galvanised coils - But revenue made it a case of misdeclaration and revalued the goods and also held the goods liable for confiscation redeemable by paying redemption fine and penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Held that: the appellant have filed the bill of entry as per the documents, that is bill of lading, packing list, etc. and the appellants stand .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elief - Cus. Appeal No. 55660/14 - Dated:- 29-10-2015 - Anil Choudhary, Member (J) For the Appellant : Shri Abhas Mishra, Adv For the Respondent : Shri Vikram Kaushik, AC (AR) ORDER Per Anil Choudhary The Appellant, M/s Bindal Enterprises, is in Appeal against Order-in-Original No.03-Commissioner/Cus/2014 dated 15.09.2014 passed by Commr. of Customs, Noida. 2. Brief facts are that the appellant filed bill of entry No.6359944 dated 6/8/14 declaring the goods contained in 5 containers as C.R. Coil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and stated that although they had placed order for CR coils (non-alloys) but it appears the shipper have wrongly dispatched galvanised coils. They also produced a letter dated 21/8/14 issued by the shipper-Indicca Group Limited stating that although the appellant had placed order for CR coils at the rate of 564 USD PMT but as they were out of stock of CR coils, these dispatched galvanized coils mentioning in the invoices as CR coils. Thus further certified that the rate of both the materials ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2007. The value on the basis of CIF on the date of bill of lading that is 4/7/14 at ₹ 655 USD/PMT as per NIDB was adopted and the value was worked out at Rs, 52,00,410/-against declared value of ₹ 46,58,457/- 2. Vide order dated 15/9/14 it was held that the transaction value as declared is not acceptable and valuation was adopted as per contemporaneous import data that is, NIDB data and accordingly the goods were revalued at ₹ 52,00,410/ and where held liable for confiscation u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version