Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Customs Chennai Versus Kamatchi Sponge and Power Corporation Ltd.

2016 (337) E.L.T. 73 (Tri. - Chennai) - Classification - Whether the goods imported are Heavy Melting Steel Scrap or Secondary Welded Pipes - Held that: there is no misdeclaration by appellant as seen from the purchase order/sales contract, sales confirmation report and pre-shipment inspection certificate, wherein appellants have placed orders for supply of 1000 MTs of HMSS, and imported the said goods and cleared in terms of purchase order. The test report relied by Revenue in a private laborat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nspection certificate clearly indicates that HMSS supplied was 'unshredded' and justifies the bonafide of appellant being an actual user. Therefore, the goods imported are "Heavy Melting Steel Scrap" and the clearance is allowed after mutilating the goods under customs supervision followed by the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court, uphelded decision of the Tribunal in the case of COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADURAI Versus SRI RENGA STEEL CORPORATION 2014 (9)522 - Madras High Court. - Decided ag .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

"Heavy Melting Steel Scrap" [HMSS] of quantity of 518.38 MTs . On examination the goods were found to be "10% scrap and 90% secondary welded pipes". Samples were drawn and sent to private laboratory viz. Sargam Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. Based on the test report, the adjudicating authority confiscated the goods and imposed redemption fine of ₹ 30 lakhs and personal penalty of ₹ 10 lakhs and also rejected the declared value and enhanced the value. On appeal, the Commiss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e notice and personal hearing and indirectly admitted the misdeclaration and submits that they cannot raise a new plea on this issue. She submits that as per the test report, the goods are 90% secondary welded pipes and it cannot be considered as HMSS. She further submits that Commissioner (Appeals) should not have allowed for mutilation of the goods. She relied the following citations :- (1) ACC Ludhiana Vs Aman Alloys Ltd. -2011 (271) ELT 200 (P&H) (2) BSNL Vs CCE - 2015 (320) ELT 544 (All .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed orders for supply of 1000 MTs of HMSS to their overseas supplier. The quantity of imported goods of 518.38 MTs cleared under the said bill of entry was covered in this lot. As per the purchase order and the sales confirmation, their principal had supplied the goods as "Heavy Melting Steel Scrap". He drew our attention to supplier's Pre-Shipment Inspection Certificate accompanied the said goods and submits that the goods were certified as "Heavy Melting Steel Scrap" and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t report issued by Sargam Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. is not approved by the Customs or CRCL. He further submits that the goods were imported in July 2012 and is still in the custody of Customs. He submits that the Commissioner (Appeals) ordering for mutilation of the goods before clearance is well within the law. He relied the following citations. 1) Sri Renga Steel Corporation Vs CCE & Customs Madurai-2006 (206) ELT 993 (Tri.-Chennai) 2) CCE Madurai Vs Sri Renga Steel Corporation-2014 (305) ELT 3 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue appeal against Tribunal's order was dismissed. He therefore submits that Revenue relying on Punjab and Haryana High Court decision in the case of Amman Alloys Ltd. (supra) is prevailed over by jurisdictional Madras High Court's ruling in the case of Sri Renga Steel Corporation (supra) which is binding on the authorities and the Tribunal. He also relied on CC Chennai VsGarg Steel - 2007 (219) ELT 195, Dewan Steel Industries VS CC Amritsar - 2008 (226) ELT 616 (Tri.-Del.). 4. In rejoind .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ods supplied by overseas supplier to appellant is furnished. The relevant part is reproduced as under :- As per the above contract, the appellants have placed orders for supply of 1000 MTs of HMSS with the overseas supplier, Singapore which is confirmed by the sales confirmation order dt. 26.7.2012. As per the contract and sales confirmation report and the Bill of Lading, invoice the goods were described as "Heady Melting Steel Scrap". Further, on perusal of the test report, pre-shipme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The relevant paragraphs are reproduced as under :- 4. We have carefully considered the submissions. Ld.Counsel has submitted that the appellants are willing to clear the goods on payment of duty as applicable to scrap if permitted to mutilate the goods. He has also contended that, as there was no misdeclaration of the goods by the party, the Commissioner s order confiscating the goods and imposing penalty on the party cannot be sustained. In the case of Madanlal Steel Industries (supra), it was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he goods as G.I. & M.S.WIRE SCRAP . Both the Bills of Entry declared the goods as G.I. & M.S. WIRE SCRAP . The goods were, admittedly, covered under a HIGH SEAS SALES AGREEMENT, which described the goods as LMS-LIGHT MELTING SCRAP . M/s. Aruna Machine Tolls Import and Export, Madurai, the High Seas buyers, in their statement, confirmed that the goods were purchased for melting purpose. This statement was never retracted. It was not contradicted by the department either. On these facts, i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

irst round of adjudication of the case, found, on physical examination, that the goods were usable/serviceable and hence not scrap. Obviously, the adjudicating authority did not want to record a finding of misdeclaration by the importer only on the basis of their statement. Otherwise, the authority would not have sent samples of the goods for chemical examination and inspected the goods himself. Ld. Commissioner chose to take the importer s statement as a corroborative evidence only. The main pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mstances, on the question whether the imported goods were useable/serviceable, we have to give the benefit of doubt to the importer. As the Commissioner himself chose not to take the importer s statement as conclusive evidence of misdeclaration of the goods, we would not be justified in taking a different view inasmuch as it has never been the department s proposal to confiscate the goods solely on the basis of importer s statement. At this juncture, one has got to fall back on other evidentiary .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rap . The plea for mutilation can as well be discerned as a gesture to reassure the department that the goods would only be used for melting purpose. The appellants can be seen as acting without intent to evade Customs duty. The ruling handed down by the Apex Court in the case of Madanlal Steel Industries (supra) is against mutilation of misdeclared goods. Now that we have found no misdeclaration by the importer, the plea made by the appellants for permission to mutilate the goods cannot be defe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

claration and the penalty was imposed on the importer under Section 112 of the Act on the ground that the importer, by misdeclaring the goods, rendered the goods liable to confiscation under Section 111. Now that we have found no misdeclaration of the goods by the importer, there is no reason for confiscation of the goods or for penalty on the importer. 7. In the result, we set aside the impugned order to the extent of setting aside confiscation (with redemption fine) and penalty and permitting .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the only point that has to be decided in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is as to whether the respondent is liable to pay duty on the basis of scrap materials or on the basis of usable things. 8. The entire argument putforth on the side of the appellant hinges upon the report filed by the Commissioner as well as the statement alleged to have been given by one of the partners of the respondent. 9. It has been conceded on the part of the appellant that the Commissioner has not noted down t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

putforth on the side of the appellant cannot be accepted. 11. Even in the statement alleged to have been given by one of the partners of the respondent, complete description as well as length and breadth of the things which are in question have not been mentioned. In fact, in the statement alleged to have been given by one of the partners of the respondent, only small quantity as well as length of wires have been mentioned. Under the said circumstances, the Court can come to a conclusion that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal deserves to be dismissed. 13. In fine, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal deserves dismissal and accordingly is dismissed without costs. The ratio of the High Court decision and this Tribunal's decision (supra) is clearly applicable to the present case as the issues are identical and also considering the fact that there is no misdeclaration by appellant as seen from the purchase order/sales contract and sales confirmation report and pre-shipment inspection ce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version