New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (3) TMI 234 - ITAT DELHI

2016 (3) TMI 234 - ITAT DELHI - TMI - Addition on low household expenses - Withdrawals for meeting the household expenses - Held that:- Details of withdrawals for meeting the household expenses were submitted before the lower authorities by the assessee, however, the same were just brushed aside and ad-hoc addition of ₹ 4 lakhs was ordered by the AO. We take note that the AO has made the addition on account of low household expenses without any material before him and the impugned addition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 6053/Del/2013 - Dated:- 21-10-2015 - A. T. Varkey, JM And Prashant Maharishi, AM For the Appellant : Shri A K Babbar, Adv For the Respondent : Ms Nandita Kanchan, CIT DR ORDER Per A. T. Varkey, Judicial Member This appeal, at the instance of the assessee, is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXXI, New Delhi dated 16.08.2013 for the assessment year 2010-11. 2. Consequent upon a search & seizure operation on Tulip Gr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rred by him during the relevant assessment year. The AO, after perusal of the reply of the assessee, was of the opinion that the household expenses claimed by him was not sufficient to meet out the day-to-day requirements of the assessee and according to him, the amount claimed by the assessee was considered low. The AO further observed that the assessee had not been able to produce any details in respect of Telephone & electricity Bills and other expenses. The AO observed that being head of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ellate authority and the ld. CIT (A) decided the appeal ex-parte and upheld the order of the AO as under :- "3.4 All the grounds relate to the only addition being on account of low withdrawals towards household expenses. The appellant had not explained before the AO the expenses relating to Telephone and electricity. I do not find any demerits in the addition. The statement of facts filed with Form No. 35 also does not give any contrary facts. Hence the addition made by the AO is confirmed. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

requires service of notice before proceedings ex-parte. The order passed by CIT (Appeal) is silent on service of notice. There is difference between issuance of notice and service of notice. No real opportunity of hearing was provided as no notice as alleged in impugned order had been received by assessee. (C) That the Ld. CIT (Appeal) had erred in law in upholding addition of ₹ 4 lacs on a ground of low house hold withdrawal which had been made by AO by purely guess work. No specific reas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e implicit in the expression "Best Judgment". Judgment is a faculty to decide matters with wisdom, truly and legally. Judgment does not depend upon the arbitrary caprice of a Judge, but on a settled and invariable principle of justice. Though there is an element of a guess-work in a "Best Judgment Assessment" yet it shall not be a wild one but shall have a reasonable nexus to the available material and the circumstances of the case. The assessing Authority should not be vindi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ds No.(A) & (F) are general in nature and do not require any adjudication. Ground No.(E), which is regarding initiation of penalty proceedings, is premature, hence requires no adjudication. 6. Grounds No.(B) to (D) are against dismissing the appeal of the assessee ex-parte by Ld. CIT(A) and upholding the addition of ₹ 4 lakhs on account of low household withdrawal by the ld. CIT (A). 7. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee filed a detailed note on household expenses and its sources but t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al withdrawing of ₹ 4,85,014/- for meeting the household expenses consists of ₹ 96,800/- in cash and ₹ 3,88,214/- in cheque for various payment like school fees, electricity, water expenses and telephone expenses. The assessee lives in joint family and leads a simple life with no membership of any club. Considering the size and nature of living the total household drawing of ₹ 4,85,014/ are Justified for the running the household" Ld. AR submitted that the assessee p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ble Court has had held as under :- "The limits of the power are implicit in the expression "Best judgment". Judgment is a faculty to decide matters with wisdom, truly and legally. Judgment does not depend upon the arbitrary caprice of a Judge, but on a settled and invariable principle of justice. Though there is an element of a guess-work in a "Best Judgment Assessment" yet it shall not be a wild one but shall have a reasonable nexus to the available material and the cir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version