Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Ashok Varandani Versus The ITO Ward- 6 (3) , Jaipur

Disallowance of interest on borrowed capital u/s 24(b) - whether property should be let out for claiming deduction of interest? - Held that:- It is evident from the record that the assessee did not offer the amount of rent for which IT is reasonably accepted to let in terms of Section 23(1) of the Act. Besides the assessee has claimed depreciation thereon on the property without using the said flat B-2. Thus the assessee has unjustifiably claimed deduction of interest; on one hand property is tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ons, the lower authorities have rightly disallowed the proportionate interest wrongly claimed by the assessee as allowable. - Decided against assessee - ITA No. 965/JP/2013 - Dated:- 27-1-2016 - SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Assessee : Shri Rajeev Sogani, CA For The Revenue : Shri Rajinder Singh, JCIT- DR ORDER PER R.P. TOLANI, JM This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-II, Jaipur dated 24-07-2013 for the assessment year 2008-09 raising solitary gr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fied, arbitrary and against the facts of the case. Relief may please be granted by quashing the order being illegal and without authority of law. 2.1 During the course of hearing, it is found that the assessee has filed the appeal late by 50 days. The application for condonation of delay has been filed by the assessee contending that assessee's computer and software s were seized by M/s. Adobe Systems Indian (P) Ltd. due to which the appeal was filed late. The reasons were beyond the control .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

two flats at Mall Shree Residency, Plot No.29, Mission Compound, Ajmer Road, Jaipur for a total consideration of ₹ 54,86,020/- on which a housing loan of ₹ 40.50 lacs from India Bulls Financing Ltd. The assessee let out flat No. G-102 situated at Ground Floor but Flat No. B-2 situated at basement could not be let out. The assessee while furnishing the income from house property claimed deduction of interest on the entire housing loan. The AO held that Flat No. B-2 was not let out by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at B-2 and even did not use it for its own business (iv) No tax can be levied on notional income The assessee relied on following judgements before the ld. CIT(A). (i) Premsudha Exports (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT 110 ITD 158 (Mum.) (ii) DLF Office Developers vs. ACIT 23 SOT 19 (Del) However, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the following observations of ld. AO in this behalf :- …….Further during the year under review the assessee has given only one flat on rent i.e. Flat No. F-102 (area 1250 sq. ft .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

00 sq.ft ) and the remaining sum of ₹ 2,23,556/-(Rs. 5,52,316/- ₹ 3,28,760) is disallowed and added back to the total income of the assessee. In view of the facts discussed above, it is clear that the assessee has claimed excess deduction towards payment of interest under the head of Income from House Property, therefore, a total of ₹ 3,06,158/- (Rs. 82,602+Rs. 2,23,556/-) is disallowed and added back to the total income of the assessee. 4. During the course of assessment proce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e head income from business. As these flats are not used for business purposes, therefore, depreciation on the said flats is not allowable as deduction under the head income from business. Hence, the depreciation claimed on these flats at ₹ 2,74,301/- is thus disallowed and added back to the total income of the assessee. This would result in an addition of ₹ 2,74,301/- 3.3 Aggrieved, the assessee is before ITAT, ld. Counsel for the assessee contends that :- Vacancy allowance in compu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stitution of Section 23 has been elaborately dealt with in Departmental Circular No.14 of 2001 (2001) 252 ITR (St.) 65, 89 wherein it has been stated that where the property or any part is vacant for the whole of the year and the actual rent received or receivable is less than the annual letting value, the sum received or receivable is less than the annual letting value, the sum received or receivable shall be the annual value. Since all the conditions mentioned above, for the applicability of S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version