Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Wep Peripherals Ltd. Versus The State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit)

2016 (3) TMI 385 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Validity of an order passed by the Tribunal - Whether the KAT was justified in upholding the lower authorities' orders in a routine manner without considering the documents on record submitted by the petitioner independently on merits, which would prove that the product sale consideration under the contract between the petitioner and its customer/client, is inclusive of warranty period replacements and has already suffered tax? - Held that:- the finding is recorded by the Tribunal that there is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ant has failed to discharge the burden by placing valid material to show that the goods were not transferred to any other place of business or to his agent or his principal. - The petition does not deserves to be entertained. Hence, dismissed. - Decided against the appellant. - STRP No. 70/2016 - Dated:- 17-2-2016 - Jayant Patel And S. Sujatha, JJ. For the Appellant : Sri Venkatesh S Arbatti, Adv For the Respondent : Sri T K Vedamurthy, HCGP ORDER The present petition is filed on the followi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ner and its customer/client, is inclusive of warranty period replacements and has already suffered tax? 4.3. Whether the KAT was justified in rejecting the contentions of the petitioner that the Warranty replacements of spares outside the State is non taxable turnover, as such it does not attract tax under the CST Act? 4.4. Whether the KAT grossly erred in not even considering the petitioner's case against levy of interest? 4.5. Whether the KAT grossly erred in not even considering the petit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

18.12.2013 notice came to be issued by DCCT under Section 9(2) of CST Act seeking to carry out reassessment in relation to assessment year 2011-12. The petitioner filed reply to the proposition notice on 11.2.2014. Re-assessment order was passed by DCCT. 5. The petitioner filed appeals before JCCT under Section 62 of K-VAT Act challenging the said order. On 15.11.2014, the appeal was partly allowed in relation to Form No. C' and the appeal was dismissed confirming the order of levy of tax, p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The assessing authority in its order has clearly mentioned that the appellant even after utilizing the opportunity afforded to it failed to file the statutory forms. Therefore, it is clear that the appellant had not produced or submitted any such documents in support of his contention. Sec.6A of the CST Act reads thus: 6-A: Burden of proof, etc., in case of transfer of goods claimed otherwise than by way of sale. (1) Where any dealer claims that he is not liable to pay tax under this Act, in re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, for sufficient cause, permit, a declaration, duly filled and signed by the principal officer of the other place of business, or his agent or principal, as the case may be containing the prescribed particulars the prescribed form obtained from the prescribed authority, along with the evidence of dispatch of such goods and if the dealer fails to furnish such declaration, then, the movement of such goods shall be deemed for all purpose of this Act to have been occasioned as a result of sale. (2) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(3) shall be deemed for the purposes of this Act to have been occasioned otherwise than as a result of sale. (3) Nothing contain in sub section (2) shall preclude reassessment by the assessing authority on the ground of discovery of new facts or revision by a higher authority on the ground that the findings of the assessing authority are contrary to law, and such reassessment or revision may be done in accordance with the provisions of general sales tax law of the state. Explanation:- In this se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arranty replacements. When the statute mandates, a dealer to file Form- F with supporting documents, he bound to submit the same in support of his claims. If the dealer fails to furnish such declarations the movement of such goods shall be deemed for all purposes of the Act as a result of sale. The burden of proof has been clearly discussed by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case between Harison and Company, Belgaum and the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Belgaum Zone .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version