Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

R.R. Enterprise Versus The DCIT, CPC TDS, Gaziabad

Levy of fees under section 234E - intimation issued under section 200A in respect of processing of TDS - Held that:- We find that the issue in all these appeals is now squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of ITAT Amritsar Bench in the case of Sibia Healthcare Private Limited vs. DCIT [2015 (6) TMI 437 - ITAT AMRITSAR] adjustment in respect of levy of fees under section 234E was indeed beyond the scope of permissible adjustments contemplated under section 200A.

A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he case, the impugned levy of fees under section 234E is unsustainable in law. We, therefore, delete the impugned levy of fee under section 234E of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. - I.T.A. No.3401/Ahd/2015 - Dated:- 10-2-2016 - SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER And SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri Aseem Thakkar, AR For The Respondent : Shri B.Panda, Sr.DR ORDER PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER : This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by the Appellant for quarter -3 of F.Yr.2013-14 which is illegal and bad in law. Hence the same should be cancelled. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of the Dy.Comm.of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Cell-TDS, Ghaziabad, U.P. in passing intimation order u/s.200A of the I.T. Act, 1961 without giving show cause notice to the appellant. Hence the order so passed without giving an opportunity of being heard to the appellant being against th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nds Nos.1 to 3 are inter-connected and, therefore the same are decided together. 3.1. Brief stated facts are that while generating initiation u/s.200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) levied penalty u/s.234-E of the Act for late filing of TDS return vide order dated 19th May-2014. Aggrieved by this action, assessee preferred an appeal before ld.CIT(A), who after considering the submissions confirmed the penalty. Aggrieved by the order of the ld.CIT(A), the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(ITAT D Bench, Ahmedabad) in the case(s) of Tanish Industries Pvt.Ltd. v. DCIT & Irfan Iqbalbhai Ajmerwala vs. DCIT in ITA Nos.2296 & 2297/Ahd/2015 respectively for AY 2014-15, dated 30/11/2015. He submitted that the assessee preferred an appeal against the levy of late filing fee u/s.234-E of the I.T. Act before the ld.CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal vide order dated 01/09/2015. 5. We have heard the representatives of the respective parties and perused the material available on record .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT, Ghaziabad rendered in ITA No.3271/Ahd/2014. It reads as under: 5. I find that the issue in appeal is now squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of ITAT Amritsar Bench in the case of Sibia Healthcare Private Limited vs. DCIT - ITA No.90/Asr/2015, vide order dated 9th June, 2015, wherein the Division Bench has inter alia observed as under :- 4. We have heard the rival contentions, perused the material on record and duly considered facts of the case in the light of the appli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o. 1981 of 2014] and of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia Vs Union of India [WP No. 771 of 2014], granting stay on the demands raised in respect of fees under section 234E. The full text of these decisions were not produced before us. However, as admittedly there are no orders from the Hon ble Courts above retraining us from our adjudication on merits in respect of the issues in this appeal, and as, in our humble understanding, this appeal requires adjudication on a ve .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 206C, he shall be liable to pay, by way of fee, a sum of two hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues. (2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1st April 2010. This statutory provision, as it stood at the relevant point of time, was as follows: 200A: Processing of statements of tax deducted at source (1) Where a statement of tax deduction at source, or a correction statement, has been made by a person deducting any sum (hereafter referred to in this section as deductor) under section 200, such statement shall be processed in the following manner, namely:- (a) the sums deductible under this Chapter shall be computed after making the fol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax or interest; (d) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (c); and (e) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (c) shall be granted to the deductor: Provided that no intimation under this sub-section shall be sent after the expiry of one year from the end of the financial year in which the statement is filed. Explanatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y make a scheme for centralised processing of statements of tax deducted at source to expeditiously determine the tax payable by, or the refund due to, the deductor as required under the said subsection. 7. By way of Finance Act 2015, and with effect from 1st June 2015, there is an amendment in Section 200A and this amendment, as stated in the Finance Act 2015, is as follows: In section 200A of the Income-tax Act, in sub-section (1), for clauses (c) to (e), the following clauses shall be substit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (d); and (f) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (d) shall be granted to the deductor. 8. In effect thus, post 1st June 2015, in the course of processing of a TDS statement and issuance of intimation under section 200A in respect thereof, an adjustment could also be made in respect of the fee, if any, shall be computed in accorda .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which, at the relevant point of time, permitted computation of amount recoverable from, or payable to, the tax deductor after making the following adjustments: (a). after making adjustment on account of arithmetical errors and incorrect claims apparent from any information in the statement - Section 200A(1)(a) (b). after making adjustment for interest, if any, computed on the basis of sums deductible as computed in the statement . - Section 200A(1)(b) 9. No other adjustments in the amount refun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of the provisions of Section 234E. That is not the issue here. The issue is whether such a levy could be effected in the course of intimation under section 200A. The answer is clearly in negative. No other provision enabling a demand in respect of this levy has been pointed out to us and it is thus an admitted position that in the absence of the enabling provision .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version