Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Prism Cement Unit-II Versus C.C.E. & S.T. Bhopal

2016 (3) TMI 473 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Demand of interest and penalty - reversal of Irregularly availed cenvat credit - Held that:- In the present case, since taking of credit is a mere book entry and the same has not been utilized by the appellant, the question of compensating the Government does not arise because there is no loss of Revenue to the Government exchequer. With regard to the payment of interest for late reversal of cenvat credit. - The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CCE & ST, LTU, Bangalore- vs Bill Go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t, 1944, was substituted w.e.f. 08.04.2011 by section 63 of the Finance Act, 2011. The effect of substitution is that sub-section (6) was inserted in section 11A. Since, the period involved in the case in hand is from December, 2010 to March 2011, the provisions of sub-rule (6), inserted subsequently, will not have any application for imposition of penalty. Further, the provisions of Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 have not been invoked in the SCN for imposition of penalty. Thus, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Sheeting, Wall Panel etc., treating the same as input for manufacture of capital goods i.e. Steel Structural of Pre Fabricated Steel Building inside the factory premises. Taking of such cenvat credit was objected to by the audit wing of the Central Excise Department. Immediately the appellant reversed the irregularly availed cenvat credit. However, the appellant did not pay the interest amount for late reversal of cenvat credit. For recovery of interest amount and for imposition of penalty, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of UOI vs Ind Swift Laboratories Ltd. reported in 2011 (265) ELT 3 (SC). Hence, the present appeal before this Tribunal. 2. Heard the Ld. Counsel for both the sides and perused the records. 3. I find that the irregularly availed cenvat credit was reversed by the appellant upon detection of mistake by the Audit Wing of the Central Excise Department and before issuance of the SCN. It is an admitted fact that the irregularly availed cenvat credit has not been utilized by the appellant for payment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version