Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (3) TMI 474 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (3) TMI 474 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2015 (329) E.L.T. 954 (Tri. - Del.) - Clandestine removal of capital assets from the factory - duty demand - Whether a demand can be demanded from the appellant as manufacturer of the capital goods found in their factory at the time of visit? - Held that:- The demands proposed to be raised by Revenue on the basis of the assumption and presumption without having any cogent evidence in support of their allegation. Moreover, Income Tax Department has investigat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lant through labour contractors, we find that there was agreement between the contractors and the appellant wherein, the appellant were required to provide raw materials and electricity and the contractors have fabricated the capital goods at the site of the appellant and the appellant has paid job work charges to the contractors. As per agreement between the parties, the appellant has appointed labour contractors on job work basis to fabricate the impugned capital goods. We also note that the d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0/2015-EX(DB) - Dated:- 27-7-2015 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) and B. Ravichandran, Member (T) Shri B.L. Narsimhan, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Pramod Kumar, Joint CDR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. - The appellant are in appeal against the impugned orders. The main appellant, M/s. Kedia Castel Delleon Industries Ltd., (KDR) is manufacturer of Rectified Spirit, Extra Natural Alcohol and Indian made Foreign Liquor. These final products do not attract c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y and benami firms by showing the supply of the goods from these dummy units obtained lease/hire-purchase finance on such goods from various finance companies. The amount of lease/hire-purchase finance was routed through various bank accounts maintained in such dummy units and operated by the employees of the appellant. Therefore, it was alleged that such funds received through benami units were utilized for purchase of raw materials, inputs, components, parts, etc. and manufactured various exci .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the allegations of the Revenue is that the appellant has manufactured certain excisable goods on the basis of the invoices forming part of the scheme for acquiring working capital and steel structures and removed the same without payment of duty. He submits that three firms viz. M/s. T.S. Engineering Works, (TSE), M/s. Sigma Industrial Works (SIW) and M/s. Standard Traders and Engineers (STE) created by the appellant in order to raise working capital to meet day-to-day expenses. The said work .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

firms for various lease/hire-purchase companies. It is his contention that these invoices were raised only for the purpose of raising working capital and not for any transaction of sale of the goods to the appellant. It is also his contention that the goods shown in the invoices were merely paper transaction and the same were accounted for in the books of accounts. Therefore, the Department has raised the demand on assessment that the appellant in their factory have manufactured the items in qu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bservations made by the Income Tax Department, where they have held that the transactions between the firms and the appellants are bogus transactions and on the basis of those transactions, the appellant claimed depreciation before the income-tax authorities which have been denied. Therefore, as there was no physical assets found in existence which was claimed to be purchased from the finance received from the front firms, the demand is not sustainable. He further submits that as Income Tax Appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an admitted that the M/s. Basna Engineering Works and M/s. K.L. Engineering Works fabricated fermentation tanks in the factory of the appellant. In that case, contractors are the manufacturers of the goods, therefore, the duty cannot be demanded from the appellant. To support to his contention, he relied upon on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of AFL Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai-II reported in 2013 (295) E.L.T. 211 (Tribunal-Mumbai). Therefore, he prayed that the impugned order is to be se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cture of the goods in their factory for and at the time of visit, these capital goods were not found in their factory, therefore, the charge of clandestine removal of the said goods has been proved. Further, he submits that the fermentation tanks, etc., which were found installed in their factory have been manufactured by the appellants themselves by engaging contract labours, therefore, duty has rightly been demanded from the appellant and consequently, the penalties were rightly imposed. 4.&em .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

can be imposed on all the appellants before us? 6. To deal with the first issue, we find that it is alleged against the appellant that they have got financed by the dummy and benami Units created by them and they have procured raw materials for manufacturing of capital goods and they have manufactured as the said capital goods were not found at the time of visit in their factory. Therefore, it is alleged that the appellant have removed the said capital goods clandestinely. In fact, it is a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reover, Income Tax Department has investigated the matter thoroughly and by way of investigation, it was revealed that transactions between the dummy units and the appellants are non-existent, therefore, the question of procurement of raw materials/capital assets in the factory of the appellant does not arise. Consequently, the allegation of clandestine removal of these capital goods also does not arise. With these observations, we set aside the demand of ₹ 4,41,10,056/- against the appell .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s appointed labour contractors on job work basis to fabricate the impugned capital goods. We also note that the duty can be demanded from a manufacturer of the goods as it is a factum record that the impugned goods have been fabricated on job work basis by the contractors, therefore, as per the Central Excise provision, the appellant cannot be the manufacturer of the said goods. In that case, the duty is to be demanded from the contractor and not from the appellants. Same view has been taken by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ve admitted having fabricated the goods for and on behalf of the appellants. Similarly, merely because the said fabrication was being done by the contractors as per the design and drawings of the appellants cannot be made a ground for holding that it is the appellants who had fabricated the goods. Therefore, it was held that the appellant cannot be held as a manufacturer. Same view was taken by the Tribunal in the case of Kerala State Electricity Board (supra) which has been upheld by the Hon bl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version