New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (3) TMI 562 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (3) TMI 562 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Denial of small scale exemption - Held that:- Classification list and period in the present case is different from the period and classification list involved in the case of Commissioner (Appeals)'s Order dated 06-4-1994. In the present case which is based on Commissioner (Appeals)'s Order dated 04-7-2001 which was accepted by the revenue cannot be influenced by any out come in the appeal filed by the revenue in the New Delhi Tribunal. We, therefore, do n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

397)54/M-V/2005 dated 17/05/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-I, wherein the revenues appeal was rejected. 2. The fact of the case is that the respondent is engaged in the manufacture of the Time Recorder (claimed classification under sub-heading no. 9106.00), Line Converter/ Concentrator (claimed classification under sub-heading no. 8473.00) and Printer (claimed classification under sub-heading no. 9106.00). The respondent also claimed the small scale exe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t and approved by the lower authorities. On finding that the views of the department were rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals) by his Order-in-Appeal No. ZBN/375/M-IV/2001 dated 04-07-2001 and the said rejection was accepted by the Commissioner on 26-09-2001, the Deputy Commissioner called those 19 show cause notices from call book for taking decision and set aside these show cause notices vide above said Order-in-Original. Against the said Order-in-Original, the Deputy Commissioner of Central .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es on the basis of the Commissioner (Appeals)s order dated 04-07-2001 wherein the approval order of the classification passed vide Order-in-Original dated 31-07-1997 was upheld and the same has been accepted by the department pertains to the final approval of classification list No. 2/92-93 (w.e.f. 01-03-93), 23/93-94 (w.e.f. 01-04-93), 1/94-95 (w.e.f. 01-04-94), 2/94-95 (w.e.f. 20-03-95), 1/95-96 (w.e.f. 03-04-93), 1/95-96 (w.e.f. 10-05-95), 1/96-97 (w.e.f. 01-04-96), 1/97-98 (w.e.f. 04-04-97) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the issue on merit is pending in the appeal before the Tribunal New Delhi. Therefore, this appeal may be decided on the merit of classification. On query from the bench, Ld. A.R. could not produce any status of appeal, despite the passing of more than 20 years of filing said appeal. 4. On the other hand Shri Mayur Shroff, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, submits that in the present case, the Oder-in-Original was passed on the basis of finalization of the classification and up .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the present case. Therefore, irrespective of any out come in that case, no different view can be taken for the reason that order-in-original in the present case is based on the finalization of the classification list for a particular period, which attained finality. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides. 6. We find that Commissioner (Appeals) s finding on the facts are crystal clear which is reproduced below:- 4. I have carefully gone though the Review Applicatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CLPL-13/90 dated 27-08-93 has properly classified the disputed goods under S.H.N. 84714-.00. I find that in the instant appeal the Review Application is filed against OIO No. 93/10/2003-04 reveals that Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise in his findings has categorically intentioned that he has made base from OIA No. ZBN/375/M-V/2001 dated 04-7-2001. He has also mentioned that said OIA dated 4-7-2001 has been accepted by Commr., Cen.Ex. on 26-9-2001 i.e. the issue has been given finality by acce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

O No. 130/97/AC/Dn.VI dated 31-7-97. Moreover, the OIO No. V(90)17-CLPL-13/90 dated 27-08-93 relates to 13 show cause notices pertaining to period from 1-4-92 to 28-2-93; approved of Classification List 1/90 (w.e.f. 02-04-90), 1/91 (w.e.f. 02-04-91), 1/91 (w.e.f. 25-07-91), 1/91 (w.e.f. 25-07-91), 3/91-92 (w.e.f. 02-03-92), and 1/92-93 (w.e.f. 01-04-92) and denovo adjudication as per OIA No. KPS/1/696/B-II/92 dated 20-01-92. In the other words, if at all any appeal is pending in the CESTAT it wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version