Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Alfino Fashions Pvt Ltd., Shri Bipin Modi And M/s Garden Silk Mills Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs (Adjudication) -Surat-I

2016 (3) TMI 620 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Differential duty demand - Penalty imposed challenged - grievance of the assessee is that no option to pay reduced penalty of 25% under Section 11 AC was given to them, and that penalty on M/s Garden Silk Mils Limited under Rule 25 is not sustainable as the said unit was only a job worker, and that the penalty of ₹ 2 Lakhs on Shri Bipin Modi is too harsh as he is only a Director of M/s Alfino Fashions Pvt Limited. - Held that:- Imposition of penalty, in addition to demand of duty with inte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

within 30 days of receipt of this order. We also find that under the facts and Circumstances of the case, there is merit in the argument of the learned Counsel for the appellants that the penalty on M/s Garden Silk Mills Limited and Shri Bipin Modi should be reduced, and hence the penalty of ₹ 1 Lakh on M/s Garden Silk Mills Limited is reduced to ₹ 50,000/- and the penalty of ₹ 2 Lakh on Shri Bipin Modi is reduced to ₹ 1 Lakh. The impugned orders of the lower authorities .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gned common order-in-appeal dated 21.07.2008 on the same issue. Hence, all three appeals are taken up together. 2. Briefly stated the relevant facts are that M/s Alfino Fashions Pvt Ltd, procured POY at an average price of ₹ 68.18/Kg. and paid processing charges of about ₹ 10/Kg. to the processing unit M/s Garden Silk Mills Limited. Thus, though the cost of processed yarn worked out to ₹ 78.18/Kg., M/s Alfino Fashions Pvt Ltd., sold the said processed yarn at an average price o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g., on the ground that there was no further processing of the input and the same was cleared as it is. The case of the Department is that M/s Alfino Fashions Pvt Ltd and M/s Garden Silk Mills Ltd, are functioning from the same premises and are interconnected and related to each other. By the said modus operandi, the finished goods namely processed yarn was under valued and Central Excise Duty was paid at the lower value of ₹ 62.25 per Kg, whereas duty should have been paid on the value of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. 3. Heard both sides. The Learned Counsel for the appellants submits at the outset itself that the appellants are not contesting the duty liability and interest there upon. Their grievance is that no option to pay reduced penalty of 25% under Section 11 AC was given to them, and that penalty on M/s Garden Silk Mils Limited under Rule 25 is not sustainable as the said unit was only a job worker, and that the penalty of ₹ 2 Lakhs on Shri Bipin Modi is too harsh as he is only a Director of M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version