Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. HANS Interiors Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Tiruchirapalli

2016 (3) TMI 672 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Imposition of penalties u/s.77 (1a), 77(2) and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Appellant working as interior decorator not registered with the Service tax department and also not collecting any service tax on the invoices raised by him to his clients. After enquiry initiated, realised his liability and deposited tax with interest and 25% penalty before issue of show cause notice and after availing Cum tax benefit - Held that:- when the assesse is not disputing his liability for discharging the sta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

restricted to 25% of duty demanded. Decided in favour of appellant - Appeal No.ST/40104/2015 - Final Order No. 40490 / 2016 - Dated:- 16-3-2016 - SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER For the Petitioner : Shri M N Bharathi, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri R Subramaniyan, AC (AR) ORDER PER P.K.CHOUDHARY The appellant M/s. HANS Interiors, Tiruchirapalli, are providing services of interior decorators and the appellant is a proprietary concern. Show Cause Notice was issued to the appellant to dema .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o.132/2014 dated 13.10.2014 rejected the appeal and upheld the Order-In-Original. The appellant assessee has now appealed before this Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel, Shri M.N.Bharathi, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the appellant assessee submits that on an enquiry from the Anti Evasion, Tiruchirapalli, the appellant immediately got itself registered with the Service Tax Department and paid the service tax with interest and 25% of penalty before the issuance of show cause notice after availing the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rious submissions and evidences on record and the order is therefore vitiated. He filed the copy of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 and drew my attention to sub-section (4A) in support of his submissions. He relied on the following decision of the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Cus., Patna vs Advantage Media Consultant reported in 2008 (10) S.T.R. 449 (Tri. - Kolkata). 4. The Ld. AR, Shri. R. Subramaniyan, AC appearing on behalf of the revenue submits that it wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng the service tax. He further submits that the decision pertaining to the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Patna Vs. Advantage Media Consultant (supra) cited by the appellant is not relevant as the assesse therein collected service tax on the commission amount wherever the service was rendered to private parties and failed to collect service tax from Government agencies like Indian Railways. Accordingly, he prays that the appeal should be rejected and the OIA should be uphe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d of service tax alongwith the interest and 25% of the penalty on Cum Tax calculations. The relevant provisions of Section 73 (4A) is re-produced below for better appreciation of the statute. 4A) Notwithstanding anything contained in 6[sub-section (4)], where during the course of any audit, investigation or verification, it is found that any service tax has not been levied or paid or has been short levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded, but the true and complete details of transactions ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d inform the Central Excise Officer of such payment in writing, who, on receipt of such information, shall not serve any notice under subsection (1) in respect of the amount so paid and proceedings in respect of the said amount of service tax shall be deemed to have been concluded: 5 Inserted (w.e.f. 8.04.2011) by s.74 of the Finance Act, 2011(8 of 2011) 6 Substituted w.e.f. 28.5.2012 by the Finance Act, 2012 Provided that the Central Excise Officer may determine the amount of service tax, if an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

account shall be considered as the specified records.] (5) The provisions of sub-section (3) shall not apply to any case where the service tax had become payable or ought to have been paid before the 14th day of May, 2003. (6) For the purposes of this section, "relevant date" means, - (i) in the case of taxable service in respect of which service tax has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid - (a) where under the rules made under this Chapter, a periodical ret .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the rules made there under, the date of adjustment of the service tax after the final assessment thereof; (iii) in a case where any sum, relating to service tax, has erroneously been refunded, the date of such refund. 6. It would not be out of place to mention that Hon ble Supreme Court in Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd vs State of Uttar Pradesh, (1979) 118 ITR 326 (SC) observed that it is well settled law that reasonable cause can be reasonably said to be a cause which prevents a man o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version