Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Pandurang Ramchandra Jadhav Versus Union Of India Through Joint Secretary And Ors

2016 (3) TMI 772 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Writ petition - Movement of gold smuggled allegedly Writ petition - Seeking to define the territorial limits of the jurisdiction of Commissionerates or Commissioners - Seizure of smuggled gold - Held that:- the two persons were travelling by Howrah-CST Duronto Express. That was a train scheduled to arrive at Mumbai and both passengers alleged to be involved in transporting the goods were travelling by this train. When this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as to adjudicate the matter. - Decided in favour of petitioner - Writ Petition No. 7237 of 2015 - Dated:- 22-2-2016 - SC DHARMADHIKARI & GS PATEL, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr Vikram Nankani, a/w Mr. Prithviraj Chaoudhari, Ms.Neha Ahuja and Mr. H. K. Sudhakara For the Respondent : Mr B M Chatterjee, Senior Adv, with Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly and Mr. M. S. Bhardwaj JUDGEMENT 1. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has a limited challenge and, parti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he narration of facts and, particularly the allegations, it is not disputed that two persons were transporting alleged smuggled gold. They were intercepted at Shahad station on Central Railway, which is in Thane district. The investigation revealed that the gold under seizure passed through Bagdogra Airport. That is how the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax at Bagdogra is stated to be the Competent Authority. A Notification dated 9th September 2009 issued b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Affidavit in Reply and from page 72 of the paper-book, we are of the firm view that in the facts of this case, the larger or wider controversy need not be addressed. The territorial limits of the jurisdiction of Commissionerates or Commissioners need not be defined in the facts of this case. It is not necessary to express any opinion on the contents of the Notification either. The Affidavit in Reply indicates that the information was received by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ahmedabad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version