Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s APLAB House Versus ACIT, Range-1, Thane

Disallowance of interest u/s.36(1)(iii) - advance made to the sister concerns - Held that:- There can be no presumption that the shareholders’ fund of a company is utilized for the purchase of fixed assets. If the assessee has interest free funds as well as interest bearing funds at its disposal, then the presumption would be that investments were made from interest fee funds at the disposal of the assessee. The facts of the instant case abundantly show that the shareholders fund is much more th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 14/10/2011 of the ld. First Appellate Authority, Mumbai. The only ground agitated by Shri M. Subrmanian, ld. counsel for the assessee, is with respect to disallowance of ₹ 22,47,100/- made u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act). 2. During hearing, the crux of argument advanced by the ld. counsel for the assessee is that the impugned issue is covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of assessee itself for as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; 22,47,100/- u/s 36(1)(iii) and assessed the income at ₹ 8,09,20,910/-. On appeal, before the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the addition was affirmed, against which the assessee is in further appeal before this Tribunal. It is noted that for A.Y. 2006-07, which is the lead year, identical addition was made by the ld. Assessing Officer and finally, it travelled to the Tribunal, wherein, vide order dated 23/12/2011 (ITA No.3313/Mum/2010), the issue was decided in favour of the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 23,13,002 to M/s. Aplab Seba Electronics. Both these companies happened to be the group concerns. The Assessing Officer noted that the assessee had obtained certain loans on interest and the interest cost debited to the profit and loss account was ₹ 2.42 crore. Considering the fact that the loans of ₹ 44.71 lakh were advanced to the sister concerns without interest, the A.O. made proportionate disallowance of interest u/s.36(1)(iii) at the rate of 12% which resulted into an a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

such amount was utilized by the sister concerns. 7. The assessee in the case before the Hon ble Summit court in S.A.Builders Ltd. (supra) transferred substantial amount to its subsidiary company out of its cash credit account in which there was a huge debit balance. The AO held that the assessee had diverted its borrowed funds to a sister concern without charging any interest. Proportionate interest relating to the said amount, out of the total interest paid by that assessee to the Bank, was di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6(1)(iii) and held that the same should not be confused with the narrower expression for the purpose of earning income, profits or gains . In the light of such observation, the Hon ble Apex Court remitted the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision by considering deductibility or otherwise of interest after examining whether the funds advanced by the assessee holding company to its subsidiary company were used by the subsidiary company for some business purpose or not. 8. From the above judg .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s advanced borrowed money to its subsidiary, which is used by the subsidiary for some business purpose, there cannot be denial of deduction on account of interest. 9. The Hon ble Supreme Court, in this case, after laying down the broad parameters helpful in taking decision about the deductibility or otherwise of interest in the hands of the holding company, being the purpose for which the funds were ultimately used by the subsidiary company, remitted the matter to the file of the Tribunal and no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

question is the commercial expediency, that is, the user of such funds by the subsidiary for business purpose . It is only when answer to both the questions is in affirmative that the holding company qualifies for deduction of interest paid. If answer to the first question is in positive, the stage of finding out the answer to the second question comes. Only when the answer to the first as well as the second questions is given in positive that the ratio of this judgment applies and the holding c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hy it categorically observed : We wish to make it clear that it is not our opinion that in every case interest on borrowed loan has to be allowed if the assessee advances it to a sister concern. It all depends on the facts and circumstances of the respective case . Thereafter, it has been observed that : For instance, if the directors of the sister concern utilize the amount advanced to it by the assessee for their personal benefit, obviously, it cannot be said that such money was advanced as a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fact of advancing loan by holding company to subsidiary company had been sufficient enough for granting deduction of interest to the holding company, there was no need to restore the matter. The Hon ble Supreme Court, in such a situation, would have itself granted deduction of interest in the hands of holding company. 11. From the above judgment, it is manifest that the assessee has to prove the commercial expediency for advancing the loans to its subsidiary company. The onus is on the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld. CIT(A) to prove the commercial expediency by demonstrating as to how the funds received by the subsidiary from the assessee company were utilized. Position is same before the Tribunal as well since there is no documentary proof to establish the commercial expediency . The situation would have been different if the assessee had placed sufficient material in support of its claim of business purpose in advancing the amount to its sister concern by properly documenting its claim and the AO woul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the amount of shareholders fund at ₹ 27,52,14,000 comprising of share capital of ₹ 5,00,00,000 and reserves and surplus of ₹ 22,52,14,000. As against this, the assessee has advanced only a sum of ₹ 44.71 lakh to its sister concerns without interest. 13. The Hon ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd. [(2009) 313 ITR 340 (Bom)] considered almost similar facts. In that case the AO recorded a finding that a sum of ₹ 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pital of ₹ 7.90 crores, apart from receiving interest free deposit of ₹ 10.03 crores. It was, therefore, submitted before the first appellate authority that the balance-sheet of the assessee adequately depicted that there were enough interest free funds at its disposal for making investment. The ld. CIT(A) got convinced with the assessee s submissions and deleted the addition. Before the Tribunal, it was contended on behalf of the Revenue that the shareholders funds were utilized for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he order of CIT(A) was upheld. When the matter came up before the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court, it was contended by the Department that the shareholders funds stood utilized in the purchase of fixed assets and hence could not be construed as available for investment in sister concern. Repelling this contention, the Hon ble High Court observed that : In our opinion, the very basis on which the Revenue had sought to contend or argue their case that the shareholders fund to the tune of over &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of East India Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. CIT [(1997) 224 ITR 627 (SC)] and also the judgment of the Hon ble Calcutta High Court in Woolcombers of India Ltd. Vs. CIT [(1981) 134 ITR 219 (Cal)] were considered. It was finally concluded that : The principle, therefore, would be that if there are funds available both interest free and overdraft and/or loans taken, then a presumption would arise that the investments would be out of interest free funds generated or available with the company, if th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version