GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (3) TMI 946 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (3) TMI 946 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Demand raised on presumption - Held that:- Tribunal in its remand order had directed the Revenue to provide copies of all the relied upon documents and opportunities to be heard to the appellant. It is seen that the Revenue has failed to do both. In these circumstances, we are left with no option but to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter for fresh adjudication after providing the copies of relied upon documents and opportunities to be hear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

material in the name of the dealers of the goods. A show-cause notice was issued seeking to demand duty and to impose penalty on the manufacturers and dealers. The matter was adjudicated ex parte and without giving relied upon documents of the appellant. The appellants approached the Tribunal, which remanded the matter to the Commissioner directing him to provide copies of relied upon documents and opportunity of personal hearing. The matter was re-adjudicated by the Commissioner. The appellant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ents to the show-cause notice were not supplied. It is seen that Sr. No. 8 of the Annexure-D to the show-cause notice listed all the records/documents withdrawn from all the seven placed searched during investigation. The learned Counsel asserted that these are relevant documents, as without these documents their defense could not be prepared. It was argued that show-cause notice has been issued demanding duty on the entire turn-over of the trading firm without analysing the nature of turn over. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce of individual bills for all the years to arrive at the exact quantum of sale of each item of goods. (ii) While arriving at the figures of sales of M/s Sahni & Co. and M/s Sahni International, the sales effected by them to parties like M/s Kohli Motor Co. and M/s P.S. Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd. has been excluded wherever possible from their turn over as the latter said companies were dealing exclusively in truck parts It was asserted that the above note indicates that the documents recovered fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Shri Kulbir Singh Sahni, Director of M/s Sunax Automotive Pvt. Ltd. on 19.8.2004 under a dated acknowledgement. The assessee and the noticees were thereafter granted a personal hearing on 11.11.2004. In response to the same, the noticee no 1 viz. Sunax Automotive Plastics Pvt. Ltd. submitted a letter dated 10.11.2004 stating they had received the intimation for personal hearing only on 8.11.2004. They further stated that since their unit was closed since the past six years they would not be able .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

these grounds, they requested that they be granted three weeks time. In response, the assessee was directed to visit the departmental offices during office hours to procure the copies of these records on or before 25.11.2004. The assessee thereafter vide their letter dated 16.12.2004, again stated that they could not trace out all the records required and that they required copies of documents in the possession of the Commissionerate office. Meanwhile, the assessee and other noticees wee again .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ant of the personal hearing on this date, the assessee submitted a letter dated 27.1.2005. The assessee again reiterated their request for copies of records. The assessee placed reliance upon the case laws in the case of Jayantilal Shah & Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai VI - 1999 (34) RLT 466 (CEGAT), Santogen Silk Mills & Ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-II - 2003 (58) RLT 217 (CEGAT-Mum), P.G.O. Processors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise - 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Order-in-Original, wherein the sequence of the order evidencing immediately proceedings in the adjudication are listed. It is seen that in the letter dated 24.11.2004, the appellants had asked for the legible copies of Panchnama and statements. They had also asked for the various records, register and documents seized in the said Panchanama. He had also asked for return of all the not relied upon documents recovered during the searches. The appellants were informed to go to Division Office w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version