Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Vijay Gupta Versus Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-XII And Another

2016 (3) TMI 977 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory requirement of payment of prescribed fees - Held that:- It is an admitted position that the requisite fee was paid during the pendency of the revision petition. The rejection of the application on the technical ground of non payment of would be taking a hyper technical view. The condition requiring the payment of fees prior to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ularity would be rectified. In the present case, the petitioner paid the requisite fee, though belatedly and thus cured the irregularity. The finding returned by the commissioner that the application was not maintainable on this account cannot be sustained and is accordingly set aside - The other ground for rejection was that the assessing officer was not at fault as there was no material on the basis of which period of holding shares by the petitioner could be calculated, by taking the date .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oner on 14.01.2011 filed the application under section 154 of the Act. The assessing officer on 21.02.2011 partly rectified the intimation and computed the tax on capital gains @ 10% as against 30% computed in the intimation issued under section 143(1) of the Act. The assessing officer, however refused to accept the application under section 154 filed by the petitioner. When the assessing officer could rectify the intimation on 21.02.2011, he could also consider the prayer of the petitioner made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

XL-35) of 1955, dated 11.4.1955 and Article 265 of the Constitution of India. The commissioner has erred in not doing so and in failing to exercise the jurisdiction vested in him on mere technical grounds. - Decided in favour of assessee - WP (C) 1572/2013 - Dated:- 23-3-2016 - Badar Durrez Ahmed And Sanjeev Sachdeva, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr Ajay Vohra, Sr Advocate with Ms Bhavita Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person For the Respondents : Mr Kamal Sawhney, Mr Raghvendra Singh, Mr Shikha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vidual. It is contended that during the period July, 2007 to November, 2007, the petitioner sold 2,98,000 shares out of 3,08,000 shares in DLF Ltd., having face value of ₹ 2 each, on the recognized stock exchange for a total consideration of ₹ 19,78,00,000. It is contended that the said shares in DLF Ltd. were received by the Petitioner as gift from his mother on 30.01.2007. 3. On 31.01.2009, the Petitioner filed his return of income for assessment year 2008-09 declaring total income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

143(1) of the Act accepting the returned income. The Assessing Officer, however levied tax @ 30% instead of 10% as computed by the Petitioner. 5. On 14.01.2011 the Petitioner filed an application under section 154 of the Act before the Respondent No. 2 contending that the capital gains on transfer of shares in DLF Ltd., were actually in the nature of long term capital gains and since the shares were sold on the recognized stock exchange, the entire gains were exempt from tax under section 10(38 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sment tax hence the assessee plea cannot be accepted as he was not aware about his income from sale of shares. However the assessee has not claimed any refund during the time prescribed in section 139 of the IT Act, 1961, hence the assessee s plea for refund cannot be accepted at this stage. This issue does not fall in the ambit of section 154 of the IT Act, 1961. In the above mentioned circumstances, the assessee s application under sec. 154 is hereby rejected. 8. The order dated 12.07.2011, re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d 12.07.2011. 10. By the Impugned Order dated 20.11.2012 the application of the petitioner under section 264 has been rejected, first of all, holding that the petition was not filed with the prescribed fee of ₹ 500/- and, secondly, that the order dated 12.11.2011 was proper as the scope of interference under section 154 of the Act was very limited and had to be strictly based on the return filed by the Petitioner/assessee and, thirdly, holding that there was no material on the basis of whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

while filing the return of income the Petitioner had calculated his period of holding the shares in DLF Ltd. from the date on which the said shares were received by him as gift from his mother. Shares in DLF Ltd were acquired by the mother partly in the year 1987 and partly consequent to conversion of secured convertible debentures issued by the said company in December, 2005. Thus computing the period as less than 12 months, the Petitioner declared income from transfer of such shares as taxabl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s capital gain arising from the transfer of a long-term capital asset; ***** ***** ***** (42A) "short-term capital asset" means a capital asset held by an Petitioner for not more than thirty-six months immediately preceding the date of its transfer: Provided that in the case of a share held in a company or any other security listed in a recognised stock exchange in India or a unit of the Unit Trust of India established under the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 (52 of 1963) or a unit of a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e shall be included the period for which the asset was held by the previous owner referred to in the said section; ***** ***** ***** (f) in the case of a capital asset, being a financial asset, allotted without any payment and on the basis of holding of any other financial asset, the period shall be reckoned from the date of the allotment of such financial asset; ***** ***** ***** (42B) "short-term capital gain" means capital gain arising from the transfer of a short-term capital asset .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the assessee by way of gift or will, the period for which the asset was held by the previous owner shall be included. 16. Therefore, for the purposes of computing capital gains on transfer of shares in DLF Ltd., the Petitioner should have included the period for which the said shares were held by his mother. This, it is contended, was not done when the return of income was filed. Since the period for which the mother had held the shares was in excess of the stipulated period for computing shor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted, which is not otherwise payable, would be illegal and unconstitutional. 18. The Supreme Court of India in CIT v. Shelly Products and another 261 ITR 367 held that if the assessee has by mistake or inadvertence or on account of ignorance, included in his income any amount which is exempted from payment of income-tax or is not income within the contemplation of law, the assessee may bring the same to the notice of the assessing officer, which if satisfied, may grant the assessee necessary reli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der the Act. If any assessee, under a mistake, misconception or on not being properly instructed is over assessed, the authorities under the Act are required to assist him and ensure that only legitimate taxes due are collected. 21. The Bombay High Court in Nirmala L. Mehta v. A. Balasubramaniam, C.I.T. (2004) 269 ITR 1 held that there cannot be any estoppel against the statute. Article 265 of the Constitution of India in unmistakable terms provides that no tax shall be levied or collected excep .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

matter of claiming and securing reliefs and in this regard the officers should take the initiative in guiding a tax payer where proceedings or other particulars before them indicate that some refund or relief is due to him. This attitude would, in the long run, benefit the department, for it would inspire confidence in him that he may be sure of getting a square deal from the department. Although, therefore, the responsibility for claiming refunds and reliefs rests with the assesses on whom it i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bliged to advise the assessee and guide them and not to take advantage of any error or mistake committed by the assessee or of their ignorance. The function of the Assessing Officer is to administer the statute with solicitude for public exchequer with an inbuilt idea of fairness to taxpayers. CIT V. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P) Limited: 291 ITR 500 (SC). 24. Section 264 of the Act read as under: 264. Revision of other orders (1) In the case of any order other than an order to which section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any order under this section if the order has been made more than one year previously. (3) In the case of an application for revision under this section by the assessee, the application must be made within one year from the date on which the order in question was communicated to him or the date on which he otherwise came to know of it, whichever is earlier: Provided that the Commissioner may, if he is satisfied that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application withi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not waived his right of appeal; or (b) where the order is pending on an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)]; or (c) where the order has been made the subject of an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) or to the Appellate Tribunal. (5) Every application by an assessee for revision under this section shall be accompanied by a fee of twenty five rupees Explanation 1-An order by the Commissioner declining to interfere shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed not to be an orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct in which such order has been passed and may make such inquiry or cause such inquiry to be made and, subject to the provisions of this Act, pass such order thereon, not being an order prejudicial to the assessee, as he thinks fit. This power has been conferred on the Commissioner to correct any order passed by a subordinate authority. 26. In Pt. Sheonath Prasad Sharma v. CIT, [1967] 66 ITR 647 (All) while determining the question, whether the assessee can, in revision question the taxability o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the return if he is satisfied, without requiring the presence of the assessee or the production of evidence in support of the return, that the return is correct and complete. But it may be that the assessee may have committed a mistake in treating a certain receipt as taxable. The mere circumstance that he has shown that receipt as income in his return does not make him liable to tax thereon. An assessee is liable to tax only upon such receipt as can be included in his total income and is ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e income is quite another matter, and consideration of that question leads into the realm of law. If the Income-tax Officer assesses an assessee upon a receipt which is not taxable in law, it is always open to the assessee to take the case in appeal or in revision thereafter. It is then for the Appellate Assistant Commissioner or the Commissioner of Income-tax, as the case may be, to examine the matter and determine whether, although the money has been received by the assessee, it is taxable in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision under Section 264. Though the Income-tax Officer accepted the income as returned by the petitioner and made assessment, its case is that the order of assessment has to be revised in view of the fact that a sum of ₹ 2,30,000 which ought to have been included in the return filed by it was omitted by inadvertence and, consequently, it was deprived of the refund of ₹ 11,500. This aspect of the case has not at all been considered by the Commissioner, ***** ***** ***** In the light o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch was deducted at source before payment of the interim dividend to it. Hence, the impugned order of the Commissioner suffers from a manifest error and has to be quashed. 28. Similar is the view taken by the Gujarat High Court in C. Parikh & Co. v. CIT: [1980] 122 ITR 610 (Guj), wherein it is observed as under: It is clear that under s. 264, the Commissioner is empowered to exercise revisional powers in favour of the assessee. In exercise of this power, the Commissioner may, either of his ow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

om making the application within the prescribed period. Sub-section (4) provides that the Commissioner has no power to revise any order under s. 264(1) : (i) while an appeal against the order is pending before the AAC, and (ii) when the order has been subject to an appeal to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Subject to the above limitation, the revisional powers conferred on the Commissioner under s. 264 are very wide. He has the discretion to grant or refuse relief and the power to pass such o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elief to the assessee in a case where the assessee detracts mistakes on account of which he was over-assessed after the assessment was completed. We do not read any such embargo in the Commissioner's power as read by the Commissioner in the present case. It is open to the Commissioner to entertain even a new ground not urged before the lower authorities while exercising revisional powers. Therefore, though the petitioner had not raised the grounds regarding under-totalling of purchases befor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ectly made in the assessment order and it has resulted in over-assessment. The Commissioner would not be acting de hors the I.T. Act, if he gives relief to the assessee in a case where it is proved to his satisfaction that there is over-assessment, whether such over-assessment is due to a mistake detected by the assessee after completion of assessment or otherwise. In our opinion, the Commissioner has misconstrued the words "subject to the provisions of this Act" in s. 264(1) and read .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pect of over-assessment as a result of under-totalling of the purchases to the extent of ₹ 20,000. (underlining supplied) 29. Relying upon the above decisions, the Kerala High Court in the case of Parekh Brothers v. CIT: 150 ITR 105 (Ker) held as under: In the light of the above discussions, we have no hesitation to hold that the Commissioner of Income-tax committed an error of law in holding that it is not open to him for the first time to entertain a relief of the kind pleaded by the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ower are well known. The jurisdiction is discretionary; Whether in a particular case, on the basis of facts disclosed, the Commissioner will exercise his jurisdiction and interfere in the matter, is a matter of discretion. It is certainly a judicial discretion vested in the Commissioner, to be exercised in accordance with law. We are not called upon to pronounce on the scope and amplitude of the revisional power. The only question mooted for our consideration in this case is whether the Commissi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the power of revision under section 264 cannot be restricted to such erroneous Orders which have become erroneous as a result of some error committed by the Income-tax Officer while passing the Orders. Independently of any decision or absence of any decision on the part of the Income-tax Officer, the Order of assessment can be challenged as erroneous if, for example, some provision was overlooked not only by the assessee but also by the Income-tax Officer. Even in such a case, the Order of a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Act. The Commissioner rejected the contention of the petitioner on the ground that since the return of income filed by the assessee under section 139(1) of the Act had been accepted by the assessing authority, the revisional powers could not be invoked to allow relief not claimed in the return. The assessee filed a Writ Petition impugning the order of the Commissioner. The contention raised by the Department was that a claim was admissible only where such claim was made by the assessee in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he entertains a revision he has the power to call for the record of any proceedings under this Act and is also entitled to make any inquiry himself or cause any inquiry to be made and pass such order as he thinks fit. The only impediment on the power of the revisional authority is that he will not pass any order prejudicial to the assessee. The respondent No. 1 has much wider power under section 264. It does not circumvent and confine the power of the revisional authority in any manner......... .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the petitioner only on technical grounds. When the substantive law confers a benefit on the assessee under a statute, it cannot be taken away by the adjudicatory authority on mere technicalities. It is settled proposition of law that no tax can be levied or recovered without authority of law. Article 265 of the Constitution of India and section 114 of the State Constitution imposes an embargo on imposition and collection of tax if the same is without authority of law. Admittedly, on the basis o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he same time where the admitted facts disclosed non-exercise of jurisdiction by an adjudicatory authority and a citizen is subjected to tax not payable by him, interference by this Court is warranted. The respondent No. 2 is directed to reassess the taxable income of the petitioner, by taking into consideration the benefit available to her under section 54F of the Income-tax Act and pass appropriate order. 32. By the impugned order dated 20.11.2012, the Commissioner has rejected the revision pet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the application on the technical ground of non payment of would be taking a hyper technical view. The condition requiring the payment of fees prior to the filing of the revision application would be directory in nature. From a reading of the provisions of Section 264 of the Act, it cannot be gathered that the non payment of the prescribed fee prior to the institution of the application for revision would be fatal. The non payment of the requisite fee would be a mere irregularity which could b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng officer was not at fault as there was no material on the basis of which period of holding shares by the petitioner could be calculated, by taking the date of acquisition as the year 1987 or 2005 and no fault could be found with the action of the Assessing Officer in the processing/rectification under section 143(1)/154 of the Act. 35. From the various judicial pronouncements, it is settled that the powers conferred under section 264 of the Act are very wide. The Commissioner is bound to apply .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aised for the first time in an application under Section 264. 36. An assessee is liable to tax only upon such receipt as can be included in his total income and is assessable under the Income-tax Act. There is nothing in s. 264, which places any restriction on the Commissioner's revisional power to give relief to the assessee in a case where the assessee detracts mistakes because of which he was over-assessed after the assessment was completed. Once it is found that there was a mistake in ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of law. 37. The Commissioner further erred in rejecting the application under section 264 holding that intimation under section 143(1) could not be regarded as an order and was thus not amenable to revisionary jurisdiction under section 264 of the Act. The Intimation under section 143(1) is regarded as an order for the purposes of section 264 of the Act. Commissioner Of Income Tax vs K.V. Manakram & Co. [2000] 111 TAXMAN 439 Ker; Assam Roofing Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax [2014] 43 ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version